9/11 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77 - Video Inside

Just out of curiosity, If I were to show you a animation of how both the north and south wtc towers collapsed due to the panckaing of floors. Would that clear up any controlled demolition theories?


Edit: I know I stir. :)
 
Gold9472 said:
9/11 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77

Click Here

This pretty much puts the argument to rest as far as I'm concerned.

Which side does it put to rest? It almost looks to me as if a plane did hit there. Before you get all nuts, lemme say that it does not quantify what type of plane, or who was on it.
 
Personally I dont think that quelled any theories.


Like I said, to me that "animation" is no different then if one were presented fully explaining the wtc towers collapsing from the pancaking of floors.


Again, I think we go back to the issue of the pentagon being the administrations smoking gun just waiting to totally debunk the 9/11 truth movement.


Why release an animation when they have video from the sheraton hotel and citgo gas stations?

It aint going happen.
 
Gold9472 said:
That argument is just as valuable as the Flight 77/No Flight 77 argument.

I agree completely.

I see no conclusive evidence on either side that suggests exactly what hit the pentagon.

I look at the evidence, I gather from it what I can. At this time, im not certain as to what type of plane hit the pentagon. However, based on what I have learned, it doesnt look like it was a 757.

What I am certain of is, that an arab terrorist with little piloting skills, did not fly a 757 into the pentagon as the "official" story suggests.
 
Back
Top