Bush Must Not Be Allowed To Strike Iran

Should we wait for them to attack us, or take care of this before Americans are killed?
 
BlueStateConservative said:
Should we wait for them to attack us, or take care of this before Americans are killed?
Click to expand...

That's the neoconservative outlook. That argument could be used against every country.
 
It makes more sense than the liberal outlook....wait until they attack and react to it.
 
BlueStateConservative said:
It makes more sense than the liberal outlook....wait until they attack and react to it.
Click to expand...

You do know that according to the U.S. Intelligence Review, Iran is at least 5-10 years away from having a nuclear weapon, correct?

That's of course not what the Bush Administration is saying. Not that I believe a WORD from them considering the lies they spewed to get us into Iraq.

This book says the CIA gave Iran the plans for a bomb. There were reports that AQ Khan gave Iran plans for a bomb.

However, when you take into account that Iran knows full well that both the U.S. and Israel are DYING to bomb them, could you blame them for trying to build a nuclear weapon?

Incidentally, why is it ok for Israel to have Nuclear Weapons that aren't monitored by the IAEA?

Also, you realize, that wanting to bomb Iran has nothing to do with whether or not they have a nuclear weapon. It has to do with the fact that on March 20th, Iran is going to start trading oil in Euros, and not dollars.

That will have a devastating effect on our economy.

That is why Iran is so "dangerous".

Pre-emptive war is no different than what the Nazis did.
 
BlueStateConservative said:
It makes more sense than the liberal outlook....wait until they attack and react to it.
Click to expand...

Who says they want to attack us and who says they can or will build nukes?
 
PhilosophyGenius said:
Who says they want to attack us and who says they can or will build nukes?
Click to expand...

The issue isn't nukes. They may or may not have them as far as we know... if they do, I don't blame them considering we're breathing down their necks.
 
What I'm sayin in the Bush Administration is making them look like the most dangerous threat to America in the world when they arnt.
 
PhilosophyGenius said:
What I'm sayin in the Bush Administration is making them look like the most dangerous threat to America in the world when they arnt.
Click to expand...
How do you know they are not a threat?
 
BlueStateConservative said:
Why do you answer a question with a question?
Click to expand...

The point is... we can strike anyone based on your philosophy. Why aren't we attacking North Korea? They already have nuclear weapons.
 
Gold9472 said:
The point is... we can strike anyone based on your philosophy. Why aren't we attacking North Korea? They already have nuclear weapons.
Click to expand...
The point is...it makes no difference who we attack....libs will object. When we first arrived in Iraq, libs were asking why not Iran...Iran are the dangerous ones they said....If we attacked Korea, you libs would come up with a reason why we shouldn't.
 
BlueStateConservative said:
The point is...it makes no difference who we attack....libs will object. When we first arrived in Iraq, libs were asking why not Iran...Iran are the dangerous ones they said....If we attacked Korea, you libs would come up with a reason why we shouldn't.
Click to expand...

The point is, we went to Iraq based on lies and deceit, and now as a result, 250,000 civilians have died, 2000+ American soldiers have died, and 1000's of Americans have been wounded.

For what?

You're damned right we'll object to any military action that is based on the desires of a few.
 
Gold9472 said:
The point is, we went to Iraq based on lies and deceit, and now as a result, 250,000 civilians have died, 2000+ American soldiers have died, and 1000's of Americans have been wounded.

For what?

You're damned right we'll object to any military action that is based on the desires of a few.
Click to expand...
What lies would you be referring to?
 
In order for it to be considered a lie, you must prove intent to decieve. Can you do this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top