Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: A + B = C

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749

    A + B = C

    A + B = C

    A: Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill told author Ron Suskind that Dick Cheney also supported an invasion of Iraq before Sept. 11, and the New Yorker's Jane Mayer reported on a top secret National Security Council document dating back seven months before the terror attacks that gave some insight into the vice president's thinking:

    It directed the N.S.C. staff to cooperate fully with [Cheney's secretive] Energy Task Force as it considered the "melding" of two seemingly unrelated areas of policy: "the review of operational policies towards rogue states," such as Iraq, and "actions regarding the capture of new and existing oil and gas fields."

    +

    B:


    =

    C: Lautenberg, to his enormous credit, has stuck with this story, and issued a report today explaining that the value of Cheney's Halliburton stock options rose in value 3281% in one year.

    Of course, there are more examples, but that's as simple as it gets.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    And "C" could be so many things... the police state, the bankrupting of America, Hegemony, and on and on and on...
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  3. #3
    Ignatius Riley Guest
    This formula is backed by Mike Ruppert's book "Crossing the Rubicon." In it he holds that during the Energy Task Force meetings, global peak oil and its ramifications to the oligarchs was discussed and the necessity to invade Afghanistan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Iran were established. We can deduce this simply by looking at the maps that were circulated during the meeting and later released to us, the public. Most of the rest of what went on in those meetings we are totally in the dark about. Ruppert suggests that it was in those meetings that it was made clear that a pretext for an invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq was in the works. He asserts that Cheney and co were lifted to power, planted if you will, by these oligarchs to ensure that their interests were attended to, ie the military occupation of the Mideast to ensure the corporate plundering of that region's petrol and mineral resources, a last ditch effort at an oil boondoggle at the exact end of the era of oil.

    Later, when those secret meetings came under fire by American freedom fighters, Cheney took Scalia duck hunting and galvanized the locked door on those meetings.

    I import these facts into my theory-construct so that they appear as follows:

    1) Some specific foreknowlege of the 911 plans was relayed to the oligarchs attending those meetings.

    2) Cheney is at least on the second tier of conspirators. (The first tier being a handful, maybe a half dozen, computer programmers, computer scientists, and a couple administrative-level intelligence operatives/computer scientists --working for a privatized arm of the CIA-- who monkeyed with PROMIS progeny (computer software) that's been mated with artificial intelligence to crunch the numbers, create, plan, tidy and oversee the actual military mission that was 911; tier 2 = 1 dozen folks with inside information on large chunks of the mission; tier 3 = 2 dozen folks with inside information on small parts of the mission (Bush was probably tier 3 or 4))

    3) We are in the midst of a "controlled recession," one of many that will follow global peak oil. The recessions will only get worse and worse until the bottom falls out of the global economy, likely around 2010, 2012. As the recessions worsen, the police state will become more empowered, apparent.

    Anyway, Mike Ruppert backs the equation. And for what it is worth, so do I.



    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/086...Fencoding=UTF8

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •