Some wonderments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter the_goldenhand
  • Start date Start date
the_goldenhand said:
It doesn't matter who you are or how much you know.....if I say something that damages a point you have made....I expect you to either A. give in and say yes that does kind of disprove me a bit or B. (which is what I would hope you could do) disprove what I was saying.

This thread has went completely off base due to repeating and quick reposting and people with a rather short fuse. This is when debates become cluttered and lose their original meaning. I tried pretty hard to stick to solid points and do no dragging of one self into it but you all did not allow that.

I made points that make sense. You did not disprove them and you are still the ones that come down on me like this make fun of me....and basically say i'm an idiot. I am sure that your truther movement will go far with that mentality.

"You did not disprove them." You did not click on ONE THING I posted for you. You speak of "open-mindedness".

Give me a break.
 
the_goldenhand said:
It doesn't matter who you are or how much you know......
Spoken like a true neocon... Jon, this guy is right. Make him a MOD immediately. This thread is WAYYY too cluttered.
 
I can sit here, and spend hours posting information about a topic. ANY topic. Post everything I know. However, if you're not going to read it, then why should I waste my time? If I thought you were legitimately trying to know what our "gripe" is, I would spend hours here with you.
 
Gold9472 said:
I can sit here, and spend hours posting information about a topic. ANY topic. Post everything I know. However, if you're not going to read it, then why should I waste my time? If I thought you were legitimately trying to know what our "gripe" is, I would spend hours here with you.
And yet we are anyway. This guy is right in his convoluted sort of way. He wants someone to prove him wrong, and we didn't. I admit defeat. Delete the thread?
 
AuGmENTor said:
Spoken like a true neocon... Jon, this guy is right. Make him a MOD immediately. This thread is WAYYY too cluttered.

Yea, this is still doing your part in the debate way to go ;)

As for the links.....you kind of proved my original statement. You are the people on these forums who research these things. Spend alot of time doing so. You know where the most creditable evidence is. That is why I ask for the most concrete points and for the most concrete evidence supporting them. What I got was you telling me to go to the archives which basically shows every scrap article there is. I did not come here to spend hours wasting my time reading article after article when I know others have already done it.

That is why I ask for the best evidence the things that support your ideas more than anything else. You should know which ones those are.
 
You were GIVEN links! You chose not to follow them. Thank you for recognizing my greatness! "Tell me how I'm wrong, but I don't wanna read SHIT."
 
OK... as a voice of reason, this thread will now work this way... State your question (one at a time) and we will move on when YOU have had it answered to your satisfaction. GO!
 
Yes, you gave me links...you gaves me a hundred links to a hundred different articles.....you are not listening. No one wants to read for hours on end when someone else has already done it. You are one of the experts on this topic...you are suppose to be able to pin point the most factually based evidence and which ones help your cause the most. If you can't see that then I don't even know what to say. If you don't know what your most credible evidence is then I am udderly confused.
 
Ask ONE question: We will NOT move on till it has been answered to YOUR satisfaction.
 
What are my ideas? That there is a cover-up? That the Bush Administration and others are guilty of those crimes? The hours you don't want to "waste", I spent reading each and every one of those articles. Sibel Edmonds is a cover-up. I showed you that. That is a "concrete point." Pakistan's relationship to 9/11 is a cover-up, and a "concrete point." Unfortunately, I don't have a document that says the Bush Administration planned, and orchestrated the attacks of 9/11, nor do I have one for anyone else. I did, however, "waste" my time reading, and have come to the conclusion that the Bush Administration are suspects for the crimes of 9/11. That is why I am here. You can "waste" your time or not. Don't expect a movie to tell you everything. Paul Thompson, himself, says that in the film.

I'm not suggesting from this that Pakistan is the quote unquote "solution" to 9/11 because it's not. Pakistan is one part in a very complicated story. The question to me is who else was involved with Al-Qaeda? Was Al-Qaeda used as a tool just as in the 1980's the Mujahadeen were basically used by the U.S. Government?
 
AuGmENTor said:
OK... as a voice of reason, this thread will now work this way... State your question (one at a time) and we will move on when YOU have had it answered to your satisfaction. GO!

This actually would have been a nice approach in the beginning but now I just feel that the people I have met so far on this forum do nothing but want to run people away whenever they question their beliefs......it's a bunch of christians lol Look I finally took a shot at someone.
 
I come off as a bit crass. Thats just how it is. Gold was very accomodating to you at the start. Personally, I could care less if you continue or not. Life goes on if you decide not to stay here. I reigned myself in, and tried a new tact. If it's too late, worse things have happened than a pseudointellectual leaving in a huff. Call it your hazing. Try again tomorrow. Jon is MIA, and I have had my fill. This whole forum is a little vitual home for us. There are other things to talk about in here. I have been posting in ten threads on three boards in the time that has elapsed here. If you would like to start fresh tomorrow, GREAT It was fun beating you up. If not, while I am not positive, I am pretty sure the sun will come up in the morning. Ciao.
 
Back
Top