7/7 - Also a Hoax?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Neimad9
  • Start date Start date
N

Neimad9

Guest
Ok, Now the thing about the 9/11 movement is that it has a motive behind WHY the goverment would do this. As well as a lot of holes in the official story.

But I have been hearing that it is also a common view that the government in the UK 'faked' 7/7. Now I am REALLY unsure about this since it seems to have been a couple of wackos trying to imitate the 9/11 attacks. Also very little was gained from it

Is 7/7 hoax a common view or a small one, and whats the reasoning behind it?
 
But I have noticed a trend here Jon. Damien doesn't like direct questions. In fact, out of ALL of them that have been asked, I have gotten an answer to 1. I am trying to get some idea of his knowlege base, so I know on what level to converse with him on. There are certain things you need to know to be able to even discuss these topics with someone.
 
Neimad9, has the United States participated in false flag terrorism in the past? A simple yes or no will suffice.
 
AuGmENTor said:
But I have noticed a trend here Jon. Damien doesn't like direct questions. In fact, out of ALL of them that have been asked, I have gotten an answer to 1. I am trying to get some idea of his knowlege base, so I know on what level to converse with him on. There are certain things you need to know to be able to even discuss these topics with someone.

What questions? I am confused now. I never claimed to know everything, I came to ask questions and then I ask questions based on the reply.
 
Gold9472 said:
Neimad9, has the United States participated in false flag terrorism in the past? A simple yes or no will suffice.

Arrghhhh! How can you debate these topics with a yes or no! Its simply not fair. The world is not black and white.

But if I must I would say 'yes' but I would rather have a more precise defination. I am thinking of the Bay of Pigs and basically the cold war.

But did they actually commit acts of murder is not the same.
 
Read a book entitled, "NATO's Secret Armies", and make sure you watch Bill Moyer's documentary entitled, "The Secret Government." Also, research Mohammad Mossadegh.
 
will do, Both countrys have a poor history with dealing with the middle east :(
 
The problem with the Middle East is that both the United States and Britain favor Israel over everyone else. That has always been the problem. That, and the fact that the Middle Eastern countries are sitting on top of our oil.
 
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5948263607579389947&q=alex+jones

Trust me, watch this documentary Terror Strom by Alex Jones. About 10-15 minutes in or so he talks about how 7/7 was a false flag operation (an inside job). That's pretty much what Terror Storm focuses on, different false flag ops throughout western history; and it's done in a pretty darn entertaining way.

And by the way, everything in there are undsiputable facts. Enjoy.
 
see man, alot of us are of a like mind around here.. that is not to say we are closed minded. But that is your second strong recommendation for terrorstorm... seen it yet?
 
MI-6 should have signed there name on it like a collectable baseball. So damn obvious.
 
AuGmENTor said:
see man, alot of us are of a like mind around here.. that is not to say we are closed minded. But that is your second strong recommendation for terrorstorm... seen it yet?

Ok, I have watched it. One thing I want to point out about 7/7 is that he got key facts wrong. At about 18:24 mins in....

He said Blair was facing trouble in the elections and sure to lose The polls suggest Labour were to do badly but not lose as is what happened and then right on time the bombings happened. But the election was on 5th May 2005, two months after the election happened.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4409935.stm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_general_election,_2005

Why does he say the polls showed Labour were to lose when they did not. But worse, why does he says that the bombings were right on time for the elections when they were two months after. The election was done and dusted by 7/7.

I am wary of the documentry after that but otherwise its was very good
 
Neimad9 said:
Ok, I have watched it. One thing I want to point out about 7/7 is that he got key facts wrong. At about 18:24 mins in....

He said Blair was facing trouble in the elections and sure to lose The polls suggest Labour were to do badly but not lose as is what happened and then right on time the bombings happened. But the election was on 5th May 2005, two months after the election happened.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4409935.stm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_general_election,_2005

Why does he say the polls showed Labour were to lose when they did not. But worse, why does he says that the bombings were right on time for the elections when they were two months after. The election was done and dusted by 7/7.

I am wary of the documentry after that but otherwise its was very good
This is an interesting point you make here. And I will be asking AJ about that in an email I am currently writing. If verified, it will greatly affect how I feel about AJ and his other videos as well.
Even if 80% of it is true, why produce a documentary about getting to the truth of things, and put inaccuracies in it? If I'm behind something, I want to be behind it all the way. As soon as what you have told us here is verified, I will not promote that movie, or ANY of his work
 
I meant 2 months before the bombings happened not election*

Yeah, Be intresting to see what his answer is. TBH, THe 7/7 section is weak compared the the introduction and the 9/11 parts.
 
of course it is. i remember the shock i felt when that guy admitted they were doing drills and feeling vindicated as a 9/11 truther.
 
thumper said:
of course it is. i remember the shock i felt when that guy admitted they were doing drills and feeling vindicated as a 9/11 truther.

Sorry, Of course what is?

(ps 9/11 truther is not exactly linked to 7/7)
 
Back
Top