It depends on a few things. Is
this true? Why does Curt Weldon still "
support" both President Bush and Donald Rumsfeld? You'd really have to be a complete
IDIOT not to see the criminality of the two of them.
I recently sent this to all of my "9/11 Truth" friends.
What are your feelings on Able Danger? I recently read the full text of Curt Weldon's appearance today, and something just didn't sit well with me.
Here's the text...
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=5676
Statements like, "As a supporter of the President", and "support Don Rumsfeld" don't sit well with me. You'd have to be a literal idiot not to see how corrupt those two are. And to focus on Sandy Berger's crime, to specifically point it out, without pointing out Bush's fight against the creation of the commission, and ALL of the other evidence against Bush, makes Able Danger, and Curt Weldon "suspect".
It almost reminds me of the case they had against Clay Bertrand (Clay Shaw) in regards to the JFK Assassination. Something close, but not close enough... to "appease" the growing anger, and speculation about his death... maybe I have no idea what I'm talking about, but I'd like to hear your thoughts.
Thanks,
Jon
Originally, as you can see by
this thread, I have always been skeptical of "Able Danger".
With statements like:
"
I think I'm beginning to see what this is... this is an attempt to move the focus away from Bush, and towards Clinton. However... if his efforts bring forth an investigation, that would destroy the Bush Administration, if it wasn't a "Witch Hunt" for Clinton..."
Not long after I saw that video,
this article was released.
Who knows what to think?