http://p204.ezboard.com/faxisofjusti...art=21&stop=29
it looks fake to me... the guy is saying its wtc-7 but i have never seen a pic that shows damage to it....
so have you ever seen this pic and do you think its real????
http://p204.ezboard.com/faxisofjusti...art=21&stop=29
it looks fake to me... the guy is saying its wtc-7 but i have never seen a pic that shows damage to it....
so have you ever seen this pic and do you think its real????
Yes... it's real... I've seen it before.
John Judge pointed it out at the 9/11 People's Commission I went to... that the building was structurally damaged.
However, that wasn't the cause for the collapse... I don't think it was.
it sure looks fake to me...
to some people every picture looks fake to them.Originally Posted by 911=inside job
whatever that means...
If you notice, the damage appears to only go about 10-15 feet deep. This in no way had an effect on the main supports. When the building fell, it fell uniformly as if all the main supports had been taken out at once. If the damage was the cause the building would have fallen starting at the damage point and worked its way across.
yeah, one of my favorite arguements in person with friends is to show them the collapse footage of WTC7 and keep replaying it over and over.. while it plays saying 'solid.. liquid', 'solid.. liquid'.. the entire building turns to an almost liquid structure almost instantly.. the entire building goes from being a super-sturdy super-structure to a weak building of jello.. its unbeleivable to watch.Originally Posted by aceace