Three months back I was banned at loose Change forum for using evidence and reason to support the concrete core. A moderator there, IVXX, and a few others take, without question, the description of FEMA of the core of the towers even though, with the steel core columns FEMA describes, free fall is impossible within what was seen and heard on 9-11 at the WTC. Even though no image showing the supposed steel core columns from the demolition has ever been produced from the demolition images which shows the steel core columns at some elevation, in the core area. Here is a accounting of that which I've compiled on pages I made to document what is disinformation and crippling the 9-11truth movement.

http://algoxy.com/psych/whatis9-11_loose-change.html

I have consistently, by using demo images and logic, show that misrepresentations of construction photos or misinterpretations of demo images cannot be used to support the steel core columns. The quality questions I have asked for, the explanations of WHY the steel columns are never seen or HOW free fall is created within what was seen and heard remain completely unanswered.

We have a profound event here. Two towers, quite identical in critical ways have fallen at near free fall completely to the ground. Clearly, a primary question MUST be "what kind of structure can do this?" Then, "How?"

A major factor must be apart of the equation of the acceptable explanation. free fall must be explained within what was seen. No explanation that does not do that can be accepted. Currently the only explanation that does this is the one that use the concrete core because concrete can be fractured by a small amount of optimally placed explosive to fall instantly, steel cannot.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html

Anyway I've been banned again posting a thread about gatekeeping against the concrete core. I cannot even view the board.

Here is the error message I get.

This menu has been disabled

Loose Change Forum

Board Message
Sorry, an error occurred.

The error returned was:

You do not have permission to view this board

Here is the thread post I started at Loose Change theis morning prior to being banned again.

This is a whole issue on its own after 10's of thousands of posts spread over 4 years on a thread across the spectrum of 9-11 board seeking a realistic explanation for free fall.

People who say they do not believe the governments account/explanation support unquestioningly the FEMA description of the core of the towers. They do not answer logical questions that might support the steel core assertions, they have never produced an image which shows any of the supposed 47, 1300 foot tall columns at some elevation off the ground, in the core area. Ground zero images do not show steel core columns which have suffered collapse or bending, and breaking. GZ shows neatly cut columns with smooth square cut ends. Supported of the FEMA steel core have never provided and explanation for these square cut ends or the lack of bent/broken core columns. I know those columns were "interior box columns" which were a part of the exterior steel framework. I explain how they were cut within a "built to demolish" scenario which provides a realistic and feasible explanation for free fall and many other things.

Cutting charges built into the floors

The only problem many people have with the concrete core and the "built to demolish scenario" is the secrecy. How could it be built with explosives inside? How could a 1300 foot tall concrete tube be built inside and 33 years later nobody know?

Consider "Cold war Secrecy". Consider control of media and information. Consider, we do not know everything about the mind and memory, if images, film and video are removed, is all we have to document what existed.

Consider, gatekeeping against the concrete core supports and impossibility while obscuring the possible. If this is not true, then let some one post a detailed explanation for how the supposed 47 steel core columns were cut to appear as they do in GZ images and completely disappear from demo images while creating free fall. All fact which deserve explanation IF we are to relinquish the ONLY explanation for free fall which is completely comprehensive to the event.

If gatekeeping IS NOT what the deniers of concrete core are doing. Then they will post what they ARE doing here in this thread. Or explanations of how the supposed steel columns were cut or images of them in the core area at elevations from the demo images.

This thread is specifically for the deniers of the concrete core to say WHY they work so hard to dismiss all information about the concrete core or what rational purpose they expect that denial to serve.

REQUIREMENTS OF CREDIBILITY:We know there was a core, if one core didn't exist, then the other did.

For anybody posting who presents a purpose or reason for saying "no concrete", in order for them to be credible, the post must also explain HOW the supposed 47 steel core columns were cut to create near free fall which ALSO explains why they are NEVER seen in images of the demolition.

Confirm, on this site where many images of the concrete core are seen, or pieces of it at least, NO STEEL COLUMNS ARE SEEN INSIDE THE CORE AREA. There are also links to sites, quotes and reports of the WTC engineers and other engineers regarding the concrete core. The is some confusion tho because of the missing blueprints. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evid...lueprints.html

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

If it is asserted the steel core columns were not cut then it must be explained why they are unseen in demolition images.

Below is the site which explains free fall realistically.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html

The built to demolish scenario is the only possible way to get enough explosives placed optimally and distributed well enough to create this. Look at all the concrete in that explosive debris wave!

[image]http://algoxy.com/psych/images/corefacesexplodinglines.jpg[/img]

At the bottom of this page,

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11corexplosions.html

you will find an explanation for the red and yellow lines in the above image which are logical and totally accommodate free fall and total pulverization.

Is it logical to take without question the word of FEMA which disallows a feasible explanation for free fall? Is it logical to refuse to let people use evidence and reason to support a structure that IS SEEN (steel core columns are not) in the quest for truth?

If it is, it means that the truth is a social matter of opinion and has nothing to do with the facts.