Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Iran Denounces U.S. Nuclear Strike Stance

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,732

    Iran Denounces U.S. Nuclear Strike Stance

    Iran Denounces U.S. Nuclear Strike Stance
    Iran Denounces U.S. for Considering Nuclear Strikes, Urges U.N. to Take Action Against Violation

    http://abcnews.go.com/International/...ory?id=1910267

    By EDITH M. LEDERER

    UNITED NATIONS May 1, 2006 (AP)— Iran denounced the United States on Monday for contemplating possible nuclear strikes against Iranian targets and urged the United Nations to take urgent action against what it called a dangerous violation of international law.

    In a letter to U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan obtained by The Associated Press, Iran's U.N. Ambassador Javad Zarif called President Bush's refusal April 18 to rule out a U.S. nuclear strike on Iran and a similar follow-up statement by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice "illegal and insolent threats."

    Bush was asked whether U.S. options regarding Iran "include the possibility of a nuclear strike" if Tehran refuses to halt uranium enrichment. "All options are on the table," Bush replied, but he stressed that the United States will continue to focus on diplomacy.

    Iran insists it is legally entitled under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty to enrich uranium to provide fuel for civilian power plants but the United States suspects its real aim is to produce nuclear weapons, a view backed by Britain and France.

    Zarif said the use of "false pretexts" by senior U.S. officials "to make public and illegal threats of resort to force against the Islamic Republic of Iran is continuing unabated in total contempt of international law and fundamental principles of the United Nations Charter."

    The "U.S. aggressive policy" of contemplating the possible use of nuclear weapons also violates the nonproliferation treaty and other U.S. multilateral agreements, he said.

    "Such dangerous statements, particularly those of the United States president, widely considered in political and media circles as a tacit confirmation of the shocking news on the administration's possible contemplation of nuclear strikes against certain targets in Iran, defiantly articulate the United States policies and intentions on the resort to nuclear weapons," Zarif said.

    "In view of the past illegal behavior of the United States, these assertions yet again constitute matters of extreme gravity that require an urgent, concerted and resolute response on the part of the United Nations and particularly the Security Council," he said.

    "It is indeed regrettable that past failures of the United Nations in responding to these illegal and inexcusable threats have emboldened senior United States officials to go further and even consider the use of nuclear weapons as an `option on the table,'" Zarif added.

    After lengthy negotiations, the U.N. Security Council adopted a statement a month ago demanding that Iran stop enriching uranium. A report Friday from the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear watchdog, confirmed what the world already knew: Iran has refused to stop enriching uranium.

    The United States, Britain and France immediately announced plans to introduce a new Security Council resolution this week that would make Iran's compliance with their demands mandatory. To intensify pressure, they want the resolution under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter, which means it can be enforced through sanctions or military action.

    China and Russia, the two other council members with veto power, oppose sanctions and military action and want the Iran nuclear issue resolved diplomatically, with the IAEA taking the lead, not the Security Council.

    Bush called Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday to discuss Iran.

    "The two leaders stressed the importance of preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, especially in the United Nations Security Council," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said.

    A Kremlin statement said the two sides "discussed interaction on urgent international problems, including the Iranian nuclear issue, on which numerous consultations at various levels are to be held in the coming days."

    U.S. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said Annan had not yet received the letter from Zarif. The U.S. Mission to the United Nations said it was also waiting to see the letter before commenting.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,732
    U.N. Action Urged on U.S. Nuclear Threats

    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...eadlines-world

    From Times Wire Reports
    May 2, 2006

    Iran denounced the United States for contemplating possible nuclear strikes against Iranian targets and urged the United Nations to act against what it called a dangerous violation of international law.

    In a letter to U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, Iranian Ambassador Javad Zarif called President Bush's refusal — during an April 18 news conference — to rule out a nuclear strike on Iran and a similar follow-up statement by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice "illegal and insolent threats."

    The U.S. and other Western powers oppose Iran's nuclear program, which they suspect is aimed at producing weapons. Tehran says it seeks only to produce fuel for power plants.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


Similar Threads

  1. Revealed: Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran
    By beltman713 in forum The New News
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-07-2007, 07:07 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-08-2006, 05:51 PM
  3. Rep. Pocan Denounces Rep. Nass For Stance On UW Lecturer
    By Gold9472 in forum 9/11 Justice Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-15-2006, 11:10 AM
  4. Bush Won't Rule Out Nuclear Strike On Iran
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-19-2006, 08:44 AM
  5. Bush Plans Strike On Iran's Nuclear Sites
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-08-2006, 07:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •