If prices spike to over $100 a barrel, what makes them think they prices would then quickly fall to between $30 and $50 a barrel, lower than the $72 a barrel that it is now?
If prices spike to over $100 a barrel, what makes them think they prices would then quickly fall to between $30 and $50 a barrel, lower than the $72 a barrel that it is now?
You mean... who's to say that after the summer, $100 a barrel will go back down to where it should be?Originally Posted by beltman713
I don't know but my oil stocks will be through the roof!!
Enjoy your SUVs putzes!!!
Or, maybe consider getting Smart .
Exactly. It's $72 a barrel now, without an attack on Iran. Also, what if they totally cut off their oil to us? This article was using a partial cut off as their scenario, weren't they?Originally Posted by Gold9472
"Sieminski argues that with the world consuming some 85 million barrels of oil a day, a supply disruption of 2 million barrels a day (60 per cent of Iran's exports) 'can only be rebalanced through an extraordinary rise in prices.'"Originally Posted by beltman713