Bush Must Not Be Allowed To Strike Iran

[Gold9472]

In order for it to be considered a lie, you must prove intent to decieve. Can you do this?

The intelligence and facts were fixed around the policy.

[Gold9472]

The policy for pre-emptive strikes.

[Gold9472]

Here you go... an entire report about it.

Click Here

[PhilosophyGenius]

In order for it to be considered a lie, you must prove intent to decieve. Can you do this?

Here ya go:

Downing Street Memo:
http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/memos.html

Uncovered: The Whole Truth About The Iraq War: (documentary)
http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle6423.htm

Frontline: The War Behind Closed Doors: (documentary)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...ows/iraq/view/

BlueStateConservative, please watch/read these posts and tell me what ya think. Thank you.

(There's tons of proof the intel was fixed, everyone feel free to add links and maybe we could make a new thread out of this!)

[somebigguy]

Hey guys, give him a break, since Bush has changed the terminology from "WMDs" to "Nuclear Capabilities" he is completely confused and unaware of the fact that he is falling for the same scam twice.

[BlueStateConservative]

Here ya go:

Downing Street Memo:
http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/memos.html

Uncovered: The Whole Truth About The Iraq War: (documentary)
http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle6423.htm

Frontline: The War Behind Closed Doors: (documentary)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...ows/iraq/view/

BlueStateConservative, please watch/read these posts and tell me what ya think. Thank you.

(There's tons of proof the intel was fixed, everyone feel free to add links and maybe we could make a new thread out of this!)

Already read em. This is not the first liberal message board I have visited. If these DSM papers have given you the proof you need and your party has done nothing, then your party is worthless. You tell me, did the DSM come straight out of the Dan Rather school of journalism, or are the dems a bunch of spineless wussies?

[somebigguy]

Already read em. This is not the first liberal message board I have visited. If these DSM papers have given you the proof you need and your party has done nothing, then your party is worthless. You tell me, did the DSM come straight out of the Dan Rather school of journalism, or are the dems a bunch of spineless wussies?

Hey dude, we know the Liberal party is useless, why do you automatically assume we are Liberals on this board?

The Libs are lying crooks, the Republicans are lying crooks, and the supposed Democracy in America is nothing but a smokescreen.

[BlueStateConservative]

Hey dude, we know the Liberal party is useless, why do you automatically assume we are Liberals on this board?

Well, dude, this place has liberal written all over it. Most of the avatars are anti-Bush, the "9/11 truth" ad on the front page, and someone who is a Republican, says she is a "nice troll." No doubt in my mind this place is full of liberals.

[Gold9472]

Well, dude, this place has liberal written all over it. Most of the avatars are anti-Bush, the "9/11 truth" ad on the front page, and someone who is a Republican, says she is a "nice troll." No doubt in my mind this place is full of liberals.

If choosing right from wrong makes me a liberal, then yes, I am a liberal. However, I do not support the Democratic Party. There are a few shining lights, but overall, the Democratic Party is worthless.

[BlueStateConservative]

If choosing right from wrong makes me a liberal, then yes, I am a liberal. However, I do not support the Democratic Party. There are a few shining lights, but overall, the Democratic Party is worthless.

Who do you support?