Page 27 of 67 FirstFirst ... 17252627282937 ... LastLast
Results 261 to 270 of 663

Thread: A Fallen Hero - Video Inside

  1. #261
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Isn't it funny how now that Christie is about to be put in the spotlight regarding what she did to the people of New York and 9/11 First Responders she suddenly starts pointing fingers at people like Rudy Giuliani who she says, "blocked her efforts to force WTC workers to wear respirators."

    I'm reminded of the family members' call for the declassification of documents. Specifically the CIA Inspector General's report. If Tenet is pushed like Christie, don't you think he would crack as well?

    To think of all of those alleged members of the movement who don't think it's important to support the families. That it's too "LIHOP." Makes me sick.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  2. #262
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Former EPA Head Christine Whitman Talks About 9/11 Cleanup

    http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index...=203&aid=71047

    June 24, 2007

    Former EPA head Christie Whitman is stirring up controversy with former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's camp over the way cleanup was handled at the World Trade Center site.

    In an interview on WNBC, Whitman talked about criticism she's received over the years – that the EPA didn't require cleanup workers to wear respirators. She says workers were asked to wear them, but refused because it was hot, and the large equipment made communication difficult.

    Whitman says in any case, only the city could have forced workers to wear the respirators.

    "It wasn't nearly as clear who was in charge. The city is the primary responder,” said Whitman. “And then you have OSHA can't enforce – interestingly enough OSHA regulations can't be imposed on public servants and those were mostly, by the time you started the real clean-up, firefighters, emergency responders. EPA was not in charge of being able to enforce that."

    But in an angry response, former members of the Giuliani administration say Whitman is practicing revisionist history.

    They say Giuliani and his staff repeatedly told workers to wear their respirators. He also says city officials never blocked the EPA from making this a requirement and says Whitman never voiced any of these concerns at the time.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  3. #263
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Whitman defends Ground Zero statements

    http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/200...d_zero_st.html

    by J. Scott Orr
    Monday June 25, 2007, 1:54 PM

    WASHINGTON - Former Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Christie Whitman relied on sound scientific data when she told residents of Lower Manhattan that the air around Ground Zero was safe to breath after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the former New Jersey governor told Congress this afternoon.

    Testifying before a House Judiciary subcommittee, Whitman denied that the administration pressured her to present rosy air quality assessments, even though she knew the collapse of the twin towers after the attacks had released tons of hazardous chemicals into the air.

    "I am disappointed at the misstatements, innuendo and outright falsehoods that have characterized the public discussion" over the EPA's post-9/11 behavior with regard to air quality assessment, Whitman said.

    She defended the work of EPA and other federal agencies, saying they did everything possible to get accurate information to the public, even posting the results of air quality tests on a Web site.

    "There are people to blame: They are the terrorists who attacked this nation," she said.

    Recently Whitman has attempted to make a distinction between her statements regarding the smoldering rubble piles at Ground Zero and the residential neighborhoods nearby. Tests, she said, showed the air in the neighborhoods was relatively clean, but the air at Ground Zero was not and she lacked the power to force recovery workers to wear respirators.

    "It is utterly false, then, for EPA critics to assert that I... set about to mislead New Yorkers or rescue workers," Whitman said.

    But the committee's chairman, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), who represents Lower Manhattan, suggested the White House pushed Whitman and the EPA away from sounding alarms about the air quality.

    He said the administration continues in its "desire to cover up its misstatements and misdeeds in the days after the attack."

    "We have accumulated a mountain of evidence that tens of thousand of people are suffering" because of exposure to the pollutants. "The deaths of at least two individuals," Nadler said, "have been linked unquestionably to World Trade Center dust."

    Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) recounted some of Whitman's many statements about the safety of the air in Lower Manhattan: "Those quotes were dead wrong, they were literally 'dead' wrong," he said.

    Weiner dismissed Whitman's recent statements that she urged city officials to provide workers with respirators: "It looks very honestly like what it is an unseemly attempt to rewrite the public record."

    Tina Kreisher, the EPA communication director at the time now director of communications at the Department of the Interior, confirmed Whitman's statement that the agency relied on appropriate air quality tests in communicating with the public.

    "As a political appointee, I was not, and others were not, scientists. We relied on the professionals to guide us through the testing procedures and processes. When we were told the tests showed air quality within normal range, we accepted those findings," Kreisher said.

    She added that, while the White House Office of Environmental Quality did "edit" some of her press releases on the topic of air quality, none were rendered false.

    "While editing changes were made based on recommendations by the Council on Environmental Quality, I believed those changes to be upsetting in some cases, but not false. I still believe that to be true," she said.

    Whitman served as Bush's EPA administrator for about two-and-one-half years ending in 2003. During that time she was frequently at odds with the White House and came under harsh criticism from environmentalists who had hoped she would be a more potent protector of the environment.

    She was sharply criticized by the federal judge in a lawsuit brought by residents of Lower Manhattan, who charged that her pronouncements that the air was safe needlessly exposed them to dangerous airborne pollutants. A federal appeals court judge ruled that Whitman is immune from suit over her post-9/11 remarks.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  4. #264
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Whitman on hot seat over 9/11 aftermath

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070625/...attacks_health

    By DEVLIN BARRETT, Associated Press Writer 57 minutes ago

    WASHINGTON - Ex-EPA chief Christie Whitman was bombarded by boos and a host of accusations Monday at a hearing into her assurances that it had been safe to breathe the air around the fallen World Trade Center.

    The confrontation between the former head of the Environmental Protection Agency and her critics grew heated at times. Some members of the audience shouted in anger, only to be gaveled down by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., who chaired the hearing.

    For three hours Whitman faced charges from Nadler and others that the Environmental Protection Agency's public statements after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks gave people a false sense of safety.

    Whitman maintained the government warned those working on the toxic debris pile to use respirators, while elsewhere in lower Manhattan the air was safe to the general public.

    "There are indeed people to blame. They are the terrorists who attacked the United States, not the men and women at all levels of government who worked heroically to protect and defend this country," Whitman said.

    Since the attacks, independent government reviews have faulted the EPA's handling of the immediate aftermath and the agency's long-term cleanup program for nearby buildings.

    A study of more than 20,000 people by Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York concluded that, since the attacks, 70 percent of ground zero workers have suffered some sort of respiratory illness. A separate study released last month found that rescue workers and firefighters contracted sarcoidosis, a serious lung-scarring disease, at a rate more than five times as high as in the years before the attacks.

    Nadler, a Democrat whose district includes the World Trade Center site, called the hearing after years of criticizing federal officials for what he says was a negligent and incomplete cleanup.

    He said the Bush administration "has continued to make false, misleading and inaccurate statements and refused to take remedial actions, even in the face of overwhelming evidence."

    Whitman called such allegations "misinformation, innuendo and downright falsehoods."

    Her responses were mostly calm and deliberate. But under questioning from Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., Whitman angrily raised her voice, saying she based her statements on "what I was hearing from professionals," not the whims of politicians.

    Whitman pointed out that her son was in the World Trade Center complex that day, "and I almost lost him," at which point Ellison said he would not "stand here and allow you to try to obfuscate."

    "I'm not obfuscating," Whitman shot back. "I have been called a liar even in this room today."

    She has long insisted that her statements that the "air is safe" were aimed at those living and working near ground zero, not those who actually toiled on the toxic pile that included asbestos.

    "Was it wrong to try get the city back on its feet as quickly as possible in the safest way possible? Absolutely not," she said, drawing catcalls from the crowd.

    Dozens of activists and Sept. 11 rescue workers came to the hearing, and some in the audience hissed when Whitman said she felt former Mayor Rudy Giuliani's administration "did absolutely everything in its power to do what was right" in handling the health concerns.

    Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary subcommittee, said he worried that assigning blame to Whitman could mean, in future crises, that "officials might default to silence."
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  5. #265
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Whitman Met by Boos and Catcalls as She Defends Post-9/11 Statements

    http://www.nysun.com/article/57273?page_no=1

    By DEVLIN BARRETT
    Associated Press
    June 25, 2007 posted 6:16 pm EDT

    WASHINGTON (AP) - Ex-EPA chief Christie Whitman was bombarded Monday with boos, hisses, and a host of accusations at a congressional hearing after making assurances it was safe to breathe the air around the ruined World Trade Center.

    The confrontation between the former head of the Environmental Protection Agency and her fiercest critics grew heated at times, with members of the audience shouting out in anger, only to be gaveled down by the hearing chairman, Representative Jerrold Nadler, Democrat of New York who represents lower Manhattan.

    For three hours Ms. Whitman faced repeated charges from Nadler and others that the EPA's public statements in the wake of the attacks gave people a false sense of safety.

    Ms. Whitman stuck to her long-held position that the government warned those working on the toxic debris pile to use respirators, while elsewhere in lower Manhattan the air was safe to the general public.

    "There are indeed people to blame," Ms. Whitman said. "They are the terrorists who attacked the United States, not the men and women at all levels of government who worked heroically to protect and defend this country."

    Mr. Nadler, a Democrat whose district includes the World Trade Center site, called the hearing after years of criticizing federal officials for what he says was a negligent and incomplete cleanup after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

    He charged the Bush administration "has continued to make false, misleading and inaccurate statements, and refused to take remedial actions, even in the face of overwhelming evidence."

    Ms. Whitman, the main focus of much of that criticism, called such allegations "misinformation, innuendo and downright falsehoods."

    Her responses were for the most part calm and deliberate, but she answered with anger to questions from Representative Keith Ellison, Democrat of Michigan.

    "These were not whims, these were not decisions by a politician. Everything I said was based on what I was hearing from professionals," said Ms. Whitman, her voice rising.

    "My son was in Building 7, congressman, and I almost lost him," she said, at which point Mr. Ellison jumped in and said he would not "stand here and allow you to try to obfuscate."

    Ms. Whitman shot back: "I'm not obfuscating. I have been called a liar even in this room today."

    She has long insisted that her statements that the "air is safe" were aimed at those living and working near ground zero, not those who actually toiled on the toxic pile that included asbestos.

    "Was it wrong to try get the city back on its feet as quickly as possible in the safest way possible? Absolutely not... We weren't going to let the terrorists win," she said, which led to catcalls from the crowd.

    Dozens of activists and Sept. 11 rescue workers came to the hearing, and some in the audience hissed when Ms. Whitman defended Mayor Giuliani's handling of the health concerns.

    "I think the city of New York did absolutely everything in its power to do what was right by the citizens of New York," Ms. Whitman said.

    Representative Trent Franks, Republican of Arizona, the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary subcommittee, said he worried that assigning blame to Ms. Whitman could frighten future leaders from giving public statements after another crisis.

    "Officials might default to silence," Mr. Franks argued.

    Those who believe they were sickened by Sept. 11-related contamination found little in Ms. Whitman's testimony to change their opinion of her.

    "It's probably one of the best dancing performances I've seen in a long time," said retired NYPD narcotics detective John Walcott, who now has leukemia.

    "We are stunned that she's sticking to her story," said community activist Kimberly Flynn."

    Since the attacks, independent government reviews have faulted the EPA's handling of the immediate aftermath and the agency's long-term cleanup program for nearby buildings.

    A study of more than 20,000 people by Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York concluded that since the attacks, 70 percent of ground zero workers have suffered some sort of respiratory illness.

    A separate medical study released last month found that rescue workers and firefighters contracted sarcoidosis, a serious lung-scarring disease, at a rate more than five times as high as in the years before the attacks.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  6. #266
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    House Judiciary Subcmte. Hearing on EPA Response to 9/11 Attacks

    Click Here (real player)
    6/25/2007: WASHINGTON, DC: 5 hr.

    Christine Todd Whitman, former Environ. Protection Agency Admin., testifies about her agencies response to the 9/11 attacks. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), conducts a House Judiciary subcmte. investigation into due process violations by the EPA regarding air quality. Whitman directed the EPA from 2001–2003.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  7. #267
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Nadler Chairs First Comprehensive Hearing on Federal Environmental Response at WTC

    http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press...man062507.html

    6/25/2007

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Jerrold Nadler (NY-08), Chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, today gaveled in the first comprehensive House hearing on the actions of the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) and other federal agencies that may have harmed the health of individuals living and working in the vicinity of the World Trade Center on or after September 11, 2001. Congressman Nadler represents the district where the World Trade Center once stood.

    "I sincerely hope today the truth telling begins," said Rep. Nadler. "Six years after 9/11, too many questions remain about who in the federal government was really responsible for key decisions about the handling of post-9/11 air quality. We owe it to the heroes and victims of 9/11 – especially those that have now become sick – to uncover what went wrong, and ensure that it never happens again."

    At the hearing, Former EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman and other key governmental actors in the federal government's World Trade Center response were sworn in to give testimony. Ms. Whitman's appearance marks the first time she has testified at a Congressional hearing dedicated solely to the EPA’s response to the World Trade Center attacks in New York.

    Today’s hearing is the companion to one held last Wednesday by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, Chair of the Senate Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Superfund and Environmental Health which focused on the lack of a proper testing and cleaning program for indoor toxins. Together, these hearings mark the first comprehensive Congressional oversight investigations into these environmental matters since the immediate aftermath of the attacks.

    "The Republican-led Congress was quick to use 9/11 to score political points, but grossly failed to investigate what went wrong in the days, weeks and months after the attacks," Rep. Nadler added. "Together with Senator Clinton, I hope to bring the truth to light."

    Rep. Nadler’s full opening statement follows:OPENING STATEMENT OF U.S. REPRESENTATIVE JERROLD NADLER (NY-08)

    Chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties

    Hearing on "Substantive Due Process Violations Arising From the Environmental Protection Agency’s Handling of Air Quality Issues Following the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001"

    June 25, 2007Today, the Subcommittee begins its investigation into possible substantive due process violations arising from the Environmental Protection Agency’s handling of air quality issues following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

    I want to welcome our witnesses and thank them for their willingness to participate.

    This hearing continues the work begun in a hearing chaired last week by New York’s Junior Senator, Hillary Clinton, which also looked at the federal government’s failures in responding to the environmental crisis that resulted from the World Trade Center attacks.

    This hearing will examine whether the federal government, by its actions, violated the "substantive due process" rights of first responders, local residents, students and workers. Specifically "[d]id the federal government itself, by responding inadequately or improperly to the environmental impacts -- knowingly do bodily harm to its citizens, and thereby violate their constitutional rights? And, if so, which government actors were responsible?" We will look into what was known about the quality of the air versus what was communicated to the public, and whether federal government "risk communications" properly communicated necessary and legal precautions.

    So, why are we asking these questions about events that happened nearly 6 years ago?

    These hearings represent the first comprehensive Congressional oversight investigations into these matters since the immediate aftermath of the attacks. Indeed, Congress and the American people have heard very little on the record from the key players in this controversy.

    Today marks the first time that former EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman has testified at a Congressional hearing dedicated solely to the federal government’s response to the environmental and health dangers caused by the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center.

    The heroes and victims of 9/11, and the families and workers who continue to live with the consequences of that environmental disaster, deserve to know the truth; to hear from the officials who provided the assurances on air quality, and to learn why, and on what basis those assurances were made.

    Finally, we must address the future. What can we learn from the government’s response? How will our government respond to future environmental disasters like this? The Administration seems to be headed in the wrong direction already. For example, they have now mandated that public health communications during a terrorist attack be "coordinated" through the Department of Homeland Security and they are developing standards for toxic cleanups in national emergencies that may be weaker than current federal standards.

    I represent the site of the World Trade Center and the surrounding communities. The World Trade Center collapse propelled hundreds of tons of asbestos, nearly half a million pounds of lead, and untold amounts of glass fibers, steel and concrete into a massive cloud of toxic, caustic dust and smoke which blanketed parts of New York City and New Jersey, and was blown or dispersed into surrounding office buildings, schools, and residences. In addition, fires that burned for many months emitted particulate matter, various heavy metals, PCBs, VOCs, dioxin, benzene and other deadly substances.

    Tens of thousands of my constituents and others from around the country who responded to the call have already begun to suffer severe illnesses as a result of this environmental disaster. I have, unfortunately, had to spend the better part of the last five plus years attempting to cajole the federal government into telling the truth about 9/11 air quality, insisting that there must be a full and proper cleanup of the environmental toxins remaining in apartments, workplaces, and schools that, to this day, are poisoning people, and demanding that the government provide long term, comprehensive health care to those already sick -- be they first responders or area residents, workers or school children.

    In the six years since the attacks, we have accumulated a mountain of evidence that tens of thousands of those exposed are suffering from chronic respiratory disease, and, increasingly, a variety of rare cancers. The sick includes 10,000 firefighters. And, the deaths of at least two individuals -- James Zadroga and Felicia Dunn-Jones (whose family joins us today) have been linked unquestionably by government medical examiners to World Trade Center dust. Nonetheless, the federal government still refuses to respond appropriately.

    End Part I
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  8. #268
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    The Administration continues to conceal and obfuscate its misstatements, its failure to follow applicable laws, and its failure to take standard protective actions in the days and weeks following the attacks. Even worse, the Administration still fails to act to protect the health of the community and our first responders. Whatever may have been known at the time, the evidence available today mandates action.

    The Administration’s continuing lack of responsiveness stems directly, I believe, from a desire to cover up its misstatements and misdeeds in the early days after the attacks. The Administration has continued to provide false, misleading and inaccurate statements, and refused to take remedial actions, even in the face of overwhelming evidence, so that it would not have to admit that it failed to follow applicable laws and to utilize basic precautionary principles in the first place. It continues, to this day, to endanger the lives of American citizens, so it can deny that other White House concerns trumped its legal mandate to protect public health. That is why this hearing seeks to re-examine what happened back in those early days of September and October of 2001.

    Following the attacks, Administrator Christine Todd Whitman repeatedly assured New Yorkers that the air was "safe to breathe." On September 14, 2001, the New York Times concluded from Administrator Whitman’s assurances that, "tests of air and the dust coating parts of Lower Manhattan appeared to support the official view expressed by. . .federal health and environmental officials: that health problems from pollution would not be one of the legacies of the attacks."

    EPA’s Inspector General found that these statements were falsely reassuring, lacked a scientific basis, and were politically motivated. The IG said, "When the EPA made a[n] announcement that the air was ‘safe’ to breathe, it did not have sufficient data and analyses to make such a blanket statement." She called this EPA assurance, "incomplete in that it lacked necessary qualifications and thus was not supported by the data available at the time." She concluded that "EPA’s basic overriding message was that the public did not need to be concerned about airborne contaminants caused by the WTC collapse. This reassurance appeared to apply to both indoor and outdoor air."

    I believe that the IG was quite generous here. In a March, 2002 "White Paper," I detailed how Administrator Whitman’s statements not only "lacked sufficient data" and "qualification," but how she also mischaracterized what data she did have, withheld critical data from the public, and ignored a wealth of information available at the time that directly contradicted those assurances.

    The IG’s report described a process by which the White House, through the Council on Environmental Quality and the National Security Council, ". . . influenced . . . the information that EPA communicated to the public . . . when it convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones." It concluded that, "competing considerations, such as . . . the desire to open Wall Street, also played a role in EPA’s air quality statements."

    Other observers have surmised that the cost of a proper government-financed cleanup of indoor spaces, given the scope of the potential contamination, and concerns about Manhattan real estate values, were other "competing considerations."

    These EPA statements, and a series of subsequent EPA misdeeds, lulled Americans affected by 9/11 into a dangerously false sense of safety, and gave other government decision-makers, businesses and employers the cover to take extremely perilous short cuts which did further harm. After making those initial safety claims:

    EPA continued to make materially misleading statements about air quality, long-term health effects, and EPA’s alleged lack of jurisdiction for remediating indoor contamination;

    EPA illegally delegated its responsibility to clean indoor environments to New York City, which, in turn, dumped that responsibility onto individual home owners, tenants, and employers; and

    EPA conducted two so-called "indoor cleanups" that the IG, EPA’s own scientific advisory panel, and, now, the Government Accountability Office, all found lacked a proper scientific basis and failed to ensure the proper de-contamination of tens of thousands of residences and workplaces.

    The response of other federal agencies was similarly inadequate. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, for example, failed to enforce workplace safety regulations on the "pile" that it enforced at the Pentagon (where every worker was required to wear respirators and nobody has become sick). OSHA also allowed indoor workers to re-occupy workplaces that had not been properly tested and cleaned. FEMA refused to pay for testing and cleanup of indoor spaces, a cost that was much too prohibitive for most residents and small businesses. FEMA also denied payments to residents to stay elsewhere even when their homes were full of World Trade Center dust.

    New York City and State government officials followed suit by allowing re-occupation of buildings (including schools) that not been properly tested and decontaminated, advising people to clean asbestos-containing dust in their homes and workplaces with a "wet mop and a wet rag" -- illegal and unsafe advice endorsed by EPA and posted on its website -- and failing to enforce local environmental codes for worker protection.

    Based on EPA assurances, insurance companies refused to cover individual claims for proper indoor cleanups. And building owners and employers, citing the federal safety statements, did not properly test and clean the spaces for which they were ostensibly responsible.

    Finally, hundreds of thousand of people, not wanting to imagine that their government could act with such reckless disregard for their welfare, believed the false assurances, and continued to work on the pile with inadequate Personal Protective Equipment and returned to their homes, schools and workplaces that had not been properly tested and cleaned -- and have still not been.

    Six years later, we are just beginning to see the enormous consequences of these actions. Our government has knowingly exposed thousands of American citizens unnecessarily to deadly hazardous materials. And because it has never admitted the truth, Americans remain at grave risk to this day. Thousands of first-responders, residents, area workers and students are sick, and some are dead, and that toll will continue to grow until we get the truth and take appropriate action.

    Those false statements continue to the present. Ms. Whitman herself has rationalized the White House’s soft-peddling of risk in EPA statements, proclaiming to Newsweek in 2003 that she did not object to the White House changing her press releases and that, "the public wasn’t harmed by the White House’s decision to adopt the more reassuring analysis." Even now, they try to rewrite history, arguing, for example, that their reassuring statements were "only talking about air on the ‘pile,’ not in the surrounding neighborhoods" or that they were "only talking about outdoor, not indoor air" or that they had "always told residents to get their homes professionally cleaned." The IG reached a different conclusion, and the statements speak for themselves. Governor Whitman has even gone so far as to blame the victims themselves for their illnesses.

    Administrator Whitman has said, "There has never been a subsequent study that disproved what agency scientists told us all along." She omits to note that what agency scientists and others told her, was very, very different from what she communicated to the public. A September, 2003 statement of 19 EPA union local heads reads:

    Little did the Civil Service expect that their professional work would be subverted by political pressure applied by the White House. . . .These workers reported to senior EPA officials their best estimate of the risks, and they expected those estimates and the accompanying recommendations for protective measures to be released in a timely manner to those who need the information. The public was not informed of all the health risks. . . .This information was withheld . . .under orders of the White House. The Bush White House had information released, drafted by political appointees, that it knew to contradict the scientific facts. It misinformed. And many rescue workers and citizens suffered. Some citizens now face the long-term risk of asbestos-related lung cancer as well as other debilitating respiratory ailments as a result.

    I want to conclude with a pronouncement made by then-Administrator Whitman in September 2001. She declared then, "The President has said, ‘Spare no expense, do everything you need to do to make sure the people of this City. . . are safe as far as the environment is concerned.’"

    It is my fervent hope that after some of the truth begins to come to light through these hearings; we will see that this promise, made to the victims and heroes of 9/11, is finally kept.

    Thank you.

    End
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  9. #269
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Really good opening statement by Nadler. I have to give credit where credit is due.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  10. #270
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Quote Originally Posted by Gold9472
    House Judiciary Subcmte. Hearing on EPA Response to 9/11 Attacks

    Click Here (real player)
    6/25/2007: WASHINGTON, DC: 5 hr.

    Christine Todd Whitman, former Environ. Protection Agency Admin., testifies about her agencies response to the 9/11 attacks. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), conducts a House Judiciary subcmte. investigation into due process violations by the EPA regarding air quality. Whitman directed the EPA from 2001–2003.
    I hope everyone takes the time to watch Whitman squirm.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-25-2008, 08:20 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-04-2006, 07:26 PM
  3. A Fallen Hero - Video Inside
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-09-2006, 08:13 PM
  4. Honoring The Fallen - Video Inside
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-01-2005, 10:47 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-21-2005, 01:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •