Which Arguments Should Be Used When Talking About 9/11?

[somebigguy]

And if it really was a secret, we wouldn't be talking about it right now. Chuck Norris sends his regards to you sbg.

Hey, did Chuck Norris ever get to bang Christie Brinkley during those exercise videos they did together?

[ThotPolice]

In that documentary "Loose change" they say Jeb Bush was in charge of the WTC prior to it's attack and that 2 weeks before 911 the military was running security tests in the building where they where closing whole sections down at a time. They say to plant the explosives.

How true is all that?

[somebigguy]

In that documentary "Loose change" they say Jeb Bush was in charge of the WTC prior to it's attack and that 2 weeks before 911 the military was running security tests in the building where they where closing whole sections down at a time. They say to plant the explosives.

How true is all that?

Actually it was Marvin Bush, and supposedly there were a lot of 'drills' where the towers were evacuated in the weeks leading up to the attacks. This is something that Scott Forbes talked about here:

http://www.911blogger.com/2005/11/in...tt-forbes.html

[PhilosophyGenius]

Hey, did Chuck Norris ever get to bang Christie Brinkley during those exercise videos they did together?

To answer your question:
"When Chuck Norris has sex with a man, it is not because he is gay, but because he has run out of women."

Meaning yes.

[somebigguy]

To answer your question:
"When Chuck Norris has sex with a man, it is not because he is gay, but because he has run out of women."

Meaning yes.

Excellent!!!

[jetsetlemming]

It was widely reported that sensitive documents were in that building, I don't believe it was any secret.

...wait. Then what would be the point in destroying them? If there were anything about them "secret", that part'd be denied, with the non-threatening part's destruction or dissapearance explained through some official story. Lots of badly covered up stuff gets away in America. The people that believe it, no matter how much evidence they have, are labeled paranoid conspiracy freaks, and largely ignored except by the sci fi channel.

[somebigguy]

...wait. Then what would be the point in destroying them? If there were anything about them "secret", that part'd be denied, with the non-threatening part's destruction or dissapearance explained through some official story. Lots of badly covered up stuff gets away in America. The people that believe it, no matter how much evidence they have, are labeled paranoid conspiracy freaks, and largely ignored except by the sci fi channel.

The documents were known to exist in those buildings, they were evidence in court cases, and now they've been destroyed. Kinda like when a witness is killed before they get to testify. Nobody doubts that the witness existed, however, he can no longer testify in court.

Anyway, the evidence was stored in that building. Whether or not the destruction of this evidence was part of the plan is anybody's guess.

[jetsetlemming]

What was it evidence of, anyway?

[somebigguy]

What was it evidence of, anyway?

Enron documents among others...

[EminemsRevenge]

Pentagon hole?

WHAT do you call the space you shtupp when a girl has a hairy cunt shaved in the shape of a Star of David...Gold is gonna kill me for that one