Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: U.S. General Defends Phosphorus Use

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005

    U.S. General Defends Phosphorus Use

    US general defends phosphorus use


    The United States' most senior general has defended the use of weapons containing white phosphorus in Iraq.

    General Peter Pace said that such munitions were a "legitimate tool of the military", used to illuminate targets and create smokescreens.

    Two weeks ago, the US admitted using it to flush out insurgents in Falluja last year - raising concerns that it might have hit civilians.

    Initially, the military denied using it against either insurgents or civilians.

    Correspondents said having had to retract its original denial was a public relations disaster for the US.

    'Within the law'
    Gen Pace said no military went to greater lengths to avoid civilian casualties than the US army.

    He said white phosphorus, a chemical that burns on exposure to oxygen, producing a bright light and lots of white smoke, was used primarily to illuminate a battlefield or to hide troop movements.

    "It is not a chemical weapon. It is an incendiary. And it is well within the law of war to use those weapons as they're being used, for marking and for screening," he said.

    If it comes into contact with human skin, white phosphorus can ignite and burn down to the bone if it is not exhausted or extinguished.

    An Italian TV channel has reported that the US used white phosphorus against civilians in Falluja, and showed pictures of burned bodies.

    The US has denied this.

    "A bullet goes through skin even faster than white phosphorus does," Gen Pace said.

    "So I would rather have the proper instrument applied at the proper time, as precisely as possible, to get the job done, in a way that kills as many of the bad guys as possible and does as little collateral damage as possible.

    "That is just the nature of warfare."
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG

  2. #2
    Partridge Guest
    I can't believe he actually used the words "bad guys".

    Looks like Bruce Willis needn't bother making his film, the military is providing enough bad 1950s style rethoric of its own.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-09-2008, 10:10 PM
  2. 9/11 General Strike Protesting Everything In General
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-14-2007, 04:11 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-02-2007, 05:07 PM
  4. Cheney Defends Wiretaps
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-20-2005, 11:46 AM
  5. U.S. Denies Using White Phosphorus On Iraqi Civilians
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-08-2005, 09:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts