Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil (6/4/03)

  1. #1
    PhilosophyGenius Guest

    Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil (6/4/03)

    http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2003/06...48_comment.php

    Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil
    by Guardian Wednesday June 04, 2003 at 09:59 AM



    Asked why a nuclear power such as North Korea was being treated differently from Iraq, where hardly any weapons of mass destruction had been found, the deputy defence minister said: "Let's look at it simply. The most important difference between North Korea and Iraq is that economically, we just had no choice in Iraq. The country swims on a sea of oil."
    George Wright

    Wednesday June 4, 2003

    Oil was the main reason for military action against Iraq, a leading White House hawk has claimed, confirming the worst fears of those opposed to the US-led war.
    The US deputy defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz - who has already undermined Tony Blair's position over weapons of mass destruction (WMD) by describing them as a "bureaucratic" excuse for war - has now gone further by claiming the real motive was that Iraq is "swimming" in oil.

    The latest comments were made by Mr Wolfowitz in an address to delegates at an Asian security summit in Singapore at the weekend, and reported today by German newspapers Der Tagesspiegel and Die Welt.

    Asked why a nuclear power such as North Korea was being treated differently from Iraq, where hardly any weapons of mass destruction had been found, the deputy defence minister said: "Let's look at it simply. The most important difference between North Korea and Iraq is that economically, we just had no choice in Iraq. The country swims on a sea of oil."

    Mr Wolfowitz went on to tell journalists at the conference that the US was set on a path of negotiation to help defuse tensions between North Korea and its neighbours - in contrast to the more belligerent attitude the Bush administration displayed in its dealings with Iraq.

    His latest comments follow his widely reported statement from an interview in Vanity Fair last month, in which he said that "for reasons that have a lot to do with the US government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on: weapons of mass destruction."

    Prior to that, his boss, defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld, had already undermined the British government's position by saying Saddam Hussein may have destroyed his banned weapons before the war.

    Mr Wolfowitz's frank assessment of the importance of oil could not come at a worse time for the US and UK governments, which are both facing fierce criticism at home and abroad over allegations that they exaggerated the threat post by Saddam Hussein in order to justify the war.

    Amid growing calls from all parties for a public inquiry, the foreign affairs select committee announced last night it would investigate claims that the UK government misled the country over its evidence of Iraq's WMD.

    The move is a major setback for Tony Blair, who had hoped to contain any inquiry within the intelligence and security committee, which meets in secret and reports to the prime minister.

    In the US, the failure to find solid proof of chemical, biological and nuclear arms in Iraq has raised similar concerns over Mr Bush's justification for the war and prompted calls for congressional investigations.

    Mr Wolfowitz is viewed as one of the most hawkish members of the Bush administration. The 57-year old expert in international relations was a strong advocate of military action against Afghanistan and Iraq.

    Following the September 11 terror attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon, Mr Wolfowitz pledged that the US would pursue terrorists and "end" states' harbouring or sponsoring of militants.

    Prior to his appointment to the Bush cabinet in February 2001, Mr Wolfowitz was dean and professor of international relations at the Paul H Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), of the Johns Hopkins University.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,736
    Corrections and clarifications

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/correction...971436,00.html

    Friday June 6, 2003

    A report which was posted on our website on June 4 under the heading "Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil" misconstrued remarks made by the US deputy defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, making it appear that he had said that oil was the main reason for going to war in Iraq. He did not say that. He said, according to the Department of Defence website, "The ... difference between North Korea and Iraq is that we had virtually no economic options with Iraq because the country floats on a sea of oil. In the case of North Korea, the country is teetering on the edge of economic collapse and that I believe is a major point of leverage whereas the military picture with North Korea is very different from that with Iraq." The sense was clearly that the US had no economic options by means of which to achieve its objectives, not that the economic value of the oil motivated the war. The report appeared only on the website and has now been removed.

    The steam engine enthusiast referred to in Country Diary, page 20, G2, June 2, was the Rev Wilbert Awdry, (not Audry) the inventor of Thomas the Tank Engine.

    Our Country Diary, page 16, G2, last Friday, May 30, was used ahead of its scheduled publication in place of a diary that had not turned up. Unfortunately a reference to its publication coinciding with the 50th anniversary of Coronation Day was left unchanged to the dismay and perplexity of the diary's author, A Harry Griffin, and his readers. Apologies to all.

    It is the policy of the Guardian to correct significant errors as soon as possible. Please quote the date and page number. Readers may contact the office of the readers' editor by telephoning 0845 451 9589 between 11am and 5pm Monday to Friday (all calls are charged at local rate).

    Mail: Readers' editor, The Guardian, 119 Farringdon Road, London EC1R 3ER.
    Fax: 020-7239 9997.
    Email: reader@guardian.co.uk
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  3. #3
    PhilosophyGenius Guest
    Damn, your good!

  4. #4
    Partridge Guest
    "The ... difference between North Korea and Iraq is that we had virtually no economic options with Iraq"

    Apart from a mass murdering economic sanctions regime, and refusing to allow Iraq to build up a decent military - unlike North Korea which has a huge military and thus will not be invaded.

    If you ask me, thats a Fruedian slip if ever I saw one.

Similar Threads

  1. Rice offers Wolfowitz return to State Department
    By simuvac in forum The New News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-02-2007, 07:14 PM
  2. Who Is Paul Wolfowitz?
    By Gold9472 in forum 9/11 Justice Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-06-2007, 12:15 AM
  3. NEOCON WOLFOWITZ SCREWING UP WORLD BANK!
    By Chana3812 in forum The New News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-14-2006, 10:36 PM
  4. Paul Wolfowitz Is Having Problems As World Bank Head
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-02-2006, 12:06 PM
  5. EU Is 'Concerned' Over Wolfowitz
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-23-2005, 01:36 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •