Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 52

Thread: It's Much Too Late To Sweat Global Warming

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749

    It's Much Too Late To Sweat Global Warming

    It's much too late to sweat global warming
    Time to prepare for inevitable effects of our ill-fated future

    Mark Hertsgaard

    Sunday, February 13, 2005

    At the core of the global warming dilemma is a fact neither side of the debate likes to talk about: It is already too late to prevent global warming and the climate change it sets off.

    Environmentalists won't say this for fear of sounding alarmist or defeatist. Politicians won't say it because then they'd have to do something about it. The world's top climate scientists have been sending this message, however, with increasing urgency for many years.

    Since 1988, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, comprised of more than 2,000 scientific and technical experts from around the world, has conducted the most extensive peer-reviewed scientific inquiry in history.

    In its 2001 report, the panel said that human-caused global warming had already begun, and much sooner than expected. What's more, the problem is bound to get worse, perhaps a lot worse, before it gets better.

    Last month, the climate change panel's chairman, Rajendra Pachauri, upped the ante. Although Pachauri was installed after the Bush administration forced out his predecessor, Robert Watson, for pushing too hard for action, the accumulation of evidence led Pachauri to embrace apocalyptic language: "We are risking the ability of the human race to survive," he said.

    Until now, most public discussion about global warming has focused on how to prevent it -- for example, by implementing the Kyoto Protocol, which comes into force internationally (but without U.S. participation) on Wednesday. But prevention is no longer a sufficient option. No matter how many "green" cars and solar panels Kyoto eventually calls into existence, the hard fact is that a certain amount of global warming is inevitable.

    The world community therefore must make a strategic shift. It must expand its response to global warming to emphasize both long-term and short-term protection. Rising sea levels and more weather-related disasters will be a fact of life on this planet for decades to come, and we have to get ready for them.

    Among the steps needed to defend ourselves is quick action to fortify emergency response capabilities worldwide, to shield or relocate vulnerable coastal communities and to prepare for increased migration flows by environmental refugees.

    We must also play offense. We must retroactively shrink the amount of warming facing us by redoubling efforts to remove existing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and sequester them where they are no longer dangerous. One way is to plant trees, which absorb carbon dioxide via photosynthesis.

    Researchers are exploring many other methods as well, some of them supported by the Bush administration. And Norway is burying carbon dioxide in abandoned oil wells beneath the North Sea.

    The problem with the Kyoto Protocol is not that the 5 percent greenhouse gas emission reductions it mandates don't go far enough, though they don't. (The climate change panel urges 50 to 70 percent reductions.)

    The problem is that Kyoto governs only future emissions. No matter how well the protocol works, it will have no effect on past emissions, which are what have made global warming unavoidable.

    Contrary to the impression given by some news reports, global warming is not like a light switch that can be turned off if we simply stop burning so much oil, coal and gas.

    There is a lag effect of about 50 to 100 years. That's how long carbon dioxide, the primary greenhouse gas, remains in the atmosphere after it is emitted from auto tailpipes, home furnaces and industrial smokestacks.

    So even if humanity stopped burning fossil fuels tomorrow, the planet would continue warming for decades.

    So far, the greenhouse gases released during two-plus centuries of industrialization have increased global temperatures by about 1 degree Fahrenheit and raised sea levels by 4 to 7 inches.

    They have also given rise to the larger phenomenon of climate change. The climate change panel scientists predict that because of global warming, the future will bring more and deadlier weather of all kinds -- more hurricanes, tornadoes, downpours, heat waves, droughts and blizzards -- and all that comes in their aftermath: flooding, landslides, power outages, crop failures, property damage, disease, hunger, poverty and loss of life.

    In California, torrential rains induced a mudslide on Jan. 11 that killed 10 people, buried children alive and crushed dozens of houses. In 2003, a record summer heat wave killed 35,000 people, most of them elderly, in Western Europe. And this is just the beginning.

    Scientists are careful to say that no single weather event can be definitively linked to global warming, but the trend is unmistakable to the insurance companies that end up paying the bill.

    "Man-made climate change will bring us increasingly extreme natural events and, consequently, increasingly large catastrophe losses," an official of Munich Re, the world's large reinsurance company, said recently. Swiss Re expects losses to reach $150 billion a year within this decade.

    British Prime Minister Tony Blair regards climate change as "the single biggest long-term problem" of any kind facing his country. His government's top scientist, Sir David King, goes further, calling climate change "the biggest danger humanity has faced in 5,000 years of civilization."

    Although the Bush White House continues to downplay the urgency of global warming, some parts of the Bush administration have recognized the gravity of the situation. A report released last year by the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessments said that by 2020, climate change could unleash a series of interlocking catastrophes including mega-droughts, mass starvation and even nuclear war as countries like China and India battle over river valleys and other sources of scarce food and water.

    All of this underlines the urgency of revising the world's response to climate change. To be sure, it remains essential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by strengthening the Kyoto Protocol and augmenting it with other measures. Otherwise, the amount of warming that civilization eventually will have to endure will prove too great to survive.

    In the meantime, it is imperative to prepare against the climate change already on its way.

    The need for such a two-track strategy of prevention and protection is gaining acceptance from most of the world's governments. In Britain, the Department of the Environment promises to publish its strategy for adapting to global warming by the end of 2005.

    At the most recent international meeting on global warming, held in Buenos Aires in December, a majority of the delegates supported the establishment of a fund to aid countries already suffering from the early effects of global warming.

    A leading candidate for such aid is Tuvalu. A Pacific atoll whose highest point is 12 feet above sea level, Tuvalu was largely submerged last year by 10- foot seasonal high tides. But the United States opposed the adaptation assistance, arguing that there is no "certainty what constitutes a dangerous level of warming... ."

    Preparing to live through the global climate change bearing down on our civilization will be an enormous undertaking. It will require immense financial resources, technical expertise and organizational skill. But perhaps what's needed most of all, especially in the United States, is fresh thinking and political leadership -- an acceptance that climate change is inescapable and requires immediate counter-measures.

    The unspeakable death and destruction wrought by the Indian Ocean tsunami showed what can happen when people are unprepared for disaster, but there is no reason global warming should take us by surprise.

    Our civilization's early warning system -- the scientists of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -- have been telling us for years that great danger is approaching. The question is, will we act quickly and decisively enough to protect ourselves against the coming storm? Or will we simply stand and face our fate naked, proud and unafraid?

    Mark Hertsgaard is the author most recently of "The Eagle's Shadow: Why America Fascinates and Infuriates the World; and "Earth Odyssey: Around the World In Search of Our Environmental Future."

    http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...NGP4B7GC91.DTL
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Wow.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    I wrote this a long time ago. The "cause" is different, but the thinking is the same.

    I KNOW THIS IS CRAZY, BUT...

    I wonder...

    http://archives.cnn.com/2002/TECH/sc...ion/index.html
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2000325.stm
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3119434.stm
    http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/science...appearingfish/

    Do you think they're preparing for the MASS EXTINCTION?

    Do you think they're THAT evil or THAT Brilliant??

    9/11 was created for the purposes of getting oil, drugs, and money.

    What do they want all of that oil, and money for?

    Is it for us? Why not just build alternative fuels?

    If they get all of the oil now, and all of the money they can, and build shelters for themselves somewhere on the planet, they can maintain their way of life.

    We don't REALLY know what Area 51 is other than a testing facility for experimental aircraft. What about what's below? Maybe it's a shelter of some sort. Maybe there are those TYPES of facilities elsewhere, and we don't even know about it.

    They being the REAL leaders of this world.

    The planet is 4.6 billion years old. In that time there have been 5 mass extinctions. (elimination of over 90% of all life on earth).

    People think a mass extinction occurs like in a day or a week or a year, but it occurs over hundreds or thousands of years. 1/2 of all resources are depleted. half of all species on earth are extinct. We are now living in a mass extinction, but we don't really realize it.

    The Carl Sagan calendar.

    Pretend that your looking at the month of October on a calendar. 1 -31 days.

    Pretend 1 is the day the earth was created 4 billion years ago. And 31 is now. So in relative terms, Sharks have been around for like a week. Cockroaches have been around for like 3 weeks. Turtles, maybe 5 days.

    So....... How long have Humans been around?

    A week? A day?

    Answer: not even 1 second.

    Do the math, Carl sagan did it.

    Thoughts?
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Here's an educational link if you're interested.

    Click Here
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    I know this... I'm going to follow the animals. Isn't that the ultimate irony? Throughout history, we've hunted, enslaved, killed, admired, respected, and even loved animals. However, we've always thought of ourselves as "Better Than" because we can walk, talk, create, etc...

    In the "End" though (whenever that is), we'll probably rely on the animals to tell us what to do.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  6. #6
    WhiteGuySaysThis Guest
    I am sure there will be some kind of warning in the end...I refer you to http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=598

  7. #7
    ScottyAH Guest
    Good. This life's unappreiciated. We all are going to die. Fuck it...Parties over
    The human's fucked it up for everybody

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Quote Originally Posted by whiteguysaysthis
    I am sure there will be some kind of warning in the end...I refer you to http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=598
    What? I'm not dying dude... are you?
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Quote Originally Posted by ^^^^^^^^
    Good. This life's unappreiciated. We all are going to die. Fuck it...Parties over
    The human's fucked it up for everybody
    I doubt that, but I'm sure things are going to get worse before they get better.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  10. #10
    somebigguy Guest
    Don't worry, we'll simply colonize the moon and destroy it as well. The main thing is that we don't take away every persons God given right to drive gas guzzing SUVs.

Similar Threads

  1. The other side of the global warming debate....
    By Good Doctor HST in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-21-2006, 09:54 AM
  2. Global warming: blame the forests
    By Partridge in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-12-2006, 10:34 AM
  3. The Heat Is On: The Case of Global Warming
    By PhilosophyGenius in forum The New News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-14-2005, 07:48 PM
  4. Did Global Warming Cause Katrina, Rita?
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-27-2005, 12:58 PM
  5. U.S. Appears To Win Global Warming Debate
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-08-2005, 03:39 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •