HAHAHHAHAHA!!!!! me too...
it would be so much nicer to be a right wing wacko right now...
HAHAHHAHAHA!!!!! me too...
it would be so much nicer to be a right wing wacko right now...
here is a funny read of the same post... http://p218.ezboard.com/faxisofjusti...ID=23438.topic
This should not deteriorate into a discussion of what or who was behind 9/11. It should be a discussion about the need to have an investigation that answers those questions. Why should anyone accept a completely uncorroborated version of events that is given by people who are known to be liars, but also who stood to gain from the attacks themselves.
That's the point. Why are supporters of this administratin and its lies blindly accepting stories with so many discrepancies? We have a right to know the truth. It's not up to people in forums to answer the questions that have been raised. Lemmings do as lemmngs do.
Well said.Originally Posted by shadow7
Originally Posted by somebigguy
HAHAHA
I hate to disagree with all of you but the facts are pretty clear, bin Laden & al-Qaeda are directly linked to 9/11. My guess is that the neo-cons found out about the plot after taking office, stonewalled the fbi and other investegators, and made sure the attacks achieved the desired effects (controlled demolition, norad standing down, ect...)
Holla at yo boy!
Yes, but that means they orchestrated the attacks. If they made Norad stand down and they detonated the buildings, then they didn't "let it happen on purpose" as many like to say, they made it happen. Whether they orchestrated the whole thing or only helped it along, standard operating procedures and policies would have prevented those attacks. By ensuring these policies could be circumvented that day, they might as well have carried off the whole thing.Originally Posted by PhilosophyGenius
There is no "let it happen on purpose". An accessory to a crime is just as guilty.
It would seem that if Norad was ordered to ignore the planes, or for pretty much for just about all of the theory, that there'd be lots and lots of evidence and witnessesses and just a whole bunch of stuff making it irrifutable. Of course, if that stuff existed, no doubt by this point there would be any documents left that weren't shredded, and witnessesses that weren't bought off or coerced.
Norad wasn't ordered to ignore the planes, there were so many false blips thanks to Dick Cheney, they couldn't locate the correct planes.Originally Posted by jetsetlemming
That's intersting, didn't know that.Originally Posted by somebigguy