Hi, just registered for your site so am excited that this is a forum that actually does discuss 911, at least it looks that we to me.

Anyway, why are there so many mixed messages, mainly infighting, out there from the groups that cover 911? I have, and continue, to visit various reputable sites such as www.911truth.org, www.copvcia.com, www.prisonplanet.com, www.cooperativeresearch.org, plus various others. Recently I have been visiting Victor Thorn's site http://69.28.73.17/index.html and he is making a big deal out of certain websites and people being traitor's to the truth movement. His viewpoint is that all three WTC buildings came down through controlled demolition. I agree and have always thought the sites above such as 911truth.org thought so also. According to him though, no, they don't believe that. Do you members here think that? If not, please enlighten me.

If everybody does agree with that, would you also say that the reason the second tower that was hit came down first because it was going to topple due to how the plane hit it? If you watch the video you see that it was not a direct hit and can actually see plane parts flying through the sky since the building was not able to contain it due to the plane hitting the corner and not straight on. Besides WTC 7 coming down by being pulled you can see how the plane hit the corner of WTC 2 and there is no way that the pancake theory applies there. 3/4's of the building on the floors where that plane hit was not damaged due to path of the plane. Certainly structual engineers could watch that video and determine beyond a shadow of a doubt that WTC2 would not have the pancake that the "official" story says happened. What is it going to take to wake America up to this? It is so very maddening to see the truth that nobody else dares open their eyes to.