i personally agree with controlled demolition (mainly because of WTC7), but that really is just an opinion, and thats it.

i have no issue at all with those who dont find it convincing, the fact is that until it is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt it is an opinion.

as for ppl harping on 911truth and others because they dont accept controlled demolition, that is bunk. 911truth is a big supporter of david ray griffin, who beleives in controlled demolition, its just that they arent as adamant as that being the only topic that needs discussion.. there are similar people who harp on groups for not focusing on the pentagon frames, or whatever.. they typically claim 911truth covers up those topics, but they do discuss them, its just not the only thing they discuss.

in general, any 9/11 site that doesnt link to anyone else, doesnt show the variety of opinions, attacks other sites more than they provide 9/11 information, etc. is doing a disservice to new ppl to the movement.

glad your here.. i personally avoid all this internal discussion as much as possible.. the fact is that we need to bring more ppl in, and arguing amongst ourselves never gets us anywhere.. id rather spend my time bringing in new people.