Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: FDA Knew Dangers Of Thimerosal-Vaccines For 60 Years

  1. #1
    ehnyah Guest

    FDA Knew Dangers Of Thimerosal-Vaccines For 60 Years

    In order to enroll in day care or attend public
    schools in this country, children are forced to
    participate in a mandatory vaccine program. According
    to a report by the General Accounting Office released
    in 1999, over the 1990s, an estimated 12 million
    vaccinations were given each year and more than 40
    million children were vaccinated.

    Since the 1930s, mercury-based Thimerosal has been
    added to vaccines as a preservative to boost drug
    company profits by allowing vaccine makers to package
    in bulk instead of individual doses.

    According to newly discovered research, which was
    supported by a grant from the American Medical
    Association, government agencies have known for 60
    years ago that Thimerosal was neither safe or
    effective, and that it should have been removed as a
    preservative in pharmaceutical products.

    In 1948, Dr Morton of the Department of Bacteriology,
    University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Dr
    North of the Philadelphia General Hospital, and Mr
    Engley of Camp Detrick, published the results of their
    study in the Journal of the American Medical
    Association evaluating the use of mercurials in
    medicine.

    The article, "The Bacteriostatic and Bactericidal
    Action of Some Mercurial Compounds on Hemolytic
    Streptococci: In Vivo and In Vitro Studies" explained
    that "Mercurial compounds have been employed as
    disinfectants since the beginning of bacteriology."

    "Indeed, for a long period mercurial compounds, such
    as bichloride of mercury, headed the list of chemical
    which were thought to be effective in the killing of
    microorganisms," it said.

    However, the authors basically state that Thimerosal
    as a preservative is useless, "It is not highly
    germicidal and especially does not possess high
    germicidal value in the presence of serum and other
    protein mediums. The loss of antibacterial activity
    of mercurials in the presence of serum proves their
    incompatibility with serum."

    In addition, the researchers warned of the toxicity of
    Thimerosal. "The comparative in vitro studies of
    mercurochrome, metaphen and merthiolate [Thimerosal]
    on embryonic (developing) tissue cells and bacterial
    cells by Salle and Lazarus [Proceedings of the Society
    of Experimental Biology & Medicine, February 1935]
    cannot be ignored," they said.

    These investigators found Thimerosal was 262 times
    more toxic for embryonic tissue cells than for
    Staphylococcus aureus.

    More than 10 years before the results of the above
    study were published, Nye [Journal of the American
    Medical Association, January 1937] and Welch [from the
    Food and Drug Administration, Journal of Immunology
    1939] also found the same mercurial compound more
    toxic. "Not only is there a direct toxic action of the
    mercurial compounds on the cellular and humoral
    components of the animal body, but there is also the
    possibility of sensitization," they said.

    In addition, Mr Engley subsequently published an
    article in the Annals of the New York Academy of
    Sciences in 1950, titled, "Evaluation of Mercurials as
    Antiseptics" in which he declared, "...mercurials are
    ineffective in vivo and may be more toxic for tissue
    cells than bacterial cells, as shown in mice
    (Nungester and Kempf, 1942) (Sarber, 1942) (Spaulding
    and Bondi, 1947) tissue culture (Salle and Catlin,
    1947) and embryonic eggs (Witlin, 1942) (Green and
    Kirkeland, 1944), and with leucocytes (Welch and
    Hunter, 1940)."

    Due to the FDA ignoring the scientific findings and
    warnings of its own researchers, Thimerosal remained
    in vaccines for the second half of the century and has
    now been linked to an epidemic in autism, attention
    deficit disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity
    disorder, and a wide range of other neurological
    problems.

    The epidemic began as the number of vaccines added to
    the immunization schedule rose dramatically. American
    children born in 1948 were only required to show proof
    of a smallpox vaccination to enter school. By 1991 the
    number of mandated vaccines had increased from 9 to 21
    and children born in 1998 were required by most states
    to receive 33 or 34 doses of nine or ten different
    vaccines to enter school.

    Beginning in about 1987, as each new vaccine was added
    to the schedule, no one apparently thought to keep
    track of the cumulative amount of Thimerosal that
    would be injected into children with each new shot. As
    a direct result of the increased mercury, cases of
    autism began doubling every four years.

    People who are still sitting on the fence over whether
    to believe that Thimerosal is the cause of the
    epidemic need only consider the staggering statistics.
    On February 15, 2005, the GAO, released a Report
    titled, "Special Education Children With Autism," that
    revealed the number of children ages 6 through 21
    diagnosed with autism receiving special education
    services has increased more than 500% over the past 10
    years.

    State by state the numbers reveal enormity of this
    tragic situation. In Oregon, between 1989 and 1999,
    the number of school age kids with autism increased
    from 250 to 2,877 cases, according to the state's
    Department of Education statistics.

    The Pennsylvania public school system is feeling the
    pressure. Statewide, over a10 year period, the number
    of children enrolled in special education classes for
    autism disorders has increased from 634 to 5,145 in
    2002-03, the most recent year for which state
    statistics are available.

    Federal Department of Education numbers reveal that
    Ohio only had 22 reported cases of autism in 1992 and
    by 2002, the number of cases had increased to 3,057.
    In Illinois, over the same decade, there was an
    increase from five cases to 3,802. In the same time
    frame, every state in the nation had an increase of at
    least 500 percent.

    In addition, consider these odds. Fifteen years ago,
    autism affected only one in 10,000 children. Today,
    according to the American Academy of Pediatrics and
    the CDC in January of 2004, the incidence of autism is
    one in every 166 kids.

    Since 1999-2000, the number of Bucks County
    Pennsylvania autistic children receiving special
    education services has jumped at a rate of more than
    22% every year, according to the US Department of
    Education.

    Unlike normal kids, children with autism do not
    instinctively learn from observing other children
    around them. They must be taught even the simplest
    skills such as making eye contact, following
    directions, waiting their turn, or how to hold a
    conversation. In addition, behaviors, skills, and
    abilities vary from one child to the next and about
    50% of autistic kids have few or no language skills.
    They often suffer from other problems that impair the
    learning process as well, such as hearing loss or
    epilepsy.

    Therefore educating these children costs much more
    than is usually allotted for special education kids.
    For example, in Bucks Country, PA, for tuition,
    transportation, evaluations, and other services, the
    cost can reach $60,000 per child compared to $7,000
    that the average special education student receives,
    according to David Mandell, co-chairman of the
    Pennsylvania Autism Task Force, in the September 12,
    2004 Bucks County Courier

    The question of why some children develop autism and
    others do not, appears to be the luck of the draw.
    For various reasons still not completely understood,
    the bodies of some kids are incapable of ridding
    themselves of mercury. In fact, an August 2003
    International Journal of Toxicology study revealed
    that healthy normal children excreted eight times more
    mercury through their hair than did autistic children.

    The suspicion that Thimerosal was causing the epidemic
    arose in 1997, when the FDA Modernization Act was
    passed which required the FDA to investigate the
    adverse effects of all products containing mercury.
    Within a year, the FDA ordered Thimerosal removed from
    over-the-counter products, which surely indicates that
    officials knew that far back that it was dangerous.

    Once the amount of Thimerosal in vaccines was finally
    measured in 1999, the FDA discovered that children
    were receiving more than 100 times the EPA’s safe
    limit for mercury by 18 months of age and yet
    officials allowed the preservative to remain in
    vaccines. To this very day flu vaccines given to
    pregnant women and 6 month old babies contain a full
    dose of Thimerosal.

    There can be no denying that the FDA and CDC have long
    known of the damage caused by Thimerosal. A June 29,
    1999, email from FDA scientist, Peter Patriarca to the
    head of the CDC office on vaccine safety, warned that
    the FDA would be criticized for being "'asleep at the
    switch' for decades by allowing a potentially
    hazardous compound to remain in many childhood
    vaccines and not forcing manufacturers to exclude it
    from new products."

    Patriarca also pointed out the fact that calculating
    the cumulative dose of mercury in vaccines was not
    "rocket science" and involved only ninth-grade math.
    He then cited the questions that could be asked of the
    agencies: "What took the FDA so long to do the
    calculations? Why didn't CDC and the advisory bodies
    do these calculations when they rapidly expanded the
    childhood immunization schedule?"

    A secret report from a meeting attended by officials
    from the FDA and CDC in 2000, obtained with a FOIA
    request, even contained a graph which specifically
    illustrated the findings of a child's increasing risk
    of developing symptoms of autism upon receiving the
    increased amounts of Thimerosal.

    In a transcript of that secret meeting, Pediatrician
    Bill Weil, acknowledged the epidemic, "There are just
    a host of neurodevelopmental data that would suggest
    that we've got a serious problem.… The number of kids
    getting help in special education is growing
    nationally and state by state at a rate we have not
    seen before."

    However, notwithstanding this clear recognition of
    injury to kids, and although individual states have
    passed laws banning Thimerosal, the FDA has never
    required drug makers to eliminate the preservative
    from any vaccines.

    In 2000, the independent father and son research team
    of David and Mark Geier, conducted a study using the
    same CDC data used by the government in 1999, to
    compare children who received vaccines with Thimerosal
    to kids who received vaccines without it. In the
    relevant time frame, they knew that fully vaccinated
    kids received four shots by the age of 18 months, and
    so they devised a computer program to separate the
    children who received no Thimerosal from those who
    received four doses.

    The results were astounding. The children who received
    no Thimerosal had no autism, which caused the Geiers
    to question their own findings and rerun the program
    several more times. Each time it came back the same,
    kids receiving Thimerosal were over ten times more
    likely to have autism than the kids who received no
    mercury.

    Three years later, on May 21, 2003, the Mercury in
    Medicine Report was published by the Subcommittee on
    Human Rights and Wellness of the Committee on
    Government Reform. Based on an investigation spanning
    several years, the report rendered a specific finding
    that linked the preservative to autism. Included in
    the report was the following conclusion:

    "Thimerosal used as a preservative in vaccines is
    directly related to the autism epidemic. This epidemic
    in all probability may have been prevented or
    curtailed had the FDA not been asleep at the switch
    regarding a lack of safety data regarding injected
    Thimerosal and the sharper eyes of infant exposure to
    this known neurotoxin. The public health agencies'
    failure to act is indicative of institutional
    malfeasance for self protection and misplaced
    protectionism of the pharmaceutical industry."

    The Reform Report concluded that, "Because the FDA
    chose not to recall Thimerosal-containing vaccines in
    1999, in addition to all of those already injured,
    8,000 children a day continued to be placed at risk
    for overdose for at least an additional two years."

    Over 2 years have passed since that report was issued,
    and FDA and CDC officials are still allowing vaccine
    makers to use Thimerosal in the manufacturing process
    of vaccines and to add a full doses of the product to
    flu vaccines which are injected into pregnant women,
    children, and the elderly.

    In addition, officials still allow drug companies to
    ship mercury-laced vaccines for use on kids all over
    the world. As a result, autism rates are exploding in
    other countries. In China for instance, autism was
    unheard of five years ago. Since Chinese children
    began receiving vaccines with Thimerosal, well over
    one and a half million cases of autism have been
    reported. Autism is also on the rise in Argentina,
    India and Nigeria, according to Robert F Kennedy, Jr,
    in a June 20, 2005 interview on MSNBC.

    [continued]

  2. #2
    ehnyah Guest

    continued

    Drug companies deserve to be sued. Proof has surfaced
    that shows they have been knowingly injecting this
    poison into children for many years. A 1991 company
    memo which surfaced last fall in a lawsuit involving
    vaccine maker, Merck, proves beyond any doubt, that
    the company knew infants were being injected with
    unsafe amounts of Thimerosal in 1991.

    A copy of the memo was obtained by attorneys for Vera
    Easter, a Texas woman who blames drug makers for
    injuring her 7-year-old son, who is autistic and
    mentally retarded. The lawsuit was filed in the
    Eastern District of Texas against vaccine makers
    Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Aventis Pasteur, Wyeth; as
    well as Thimerosal inventor Eli Lilly.

    The 7 page memo describes how a 6-month-old baby who
    received shots on schedule would receive doses of
    mercury many times higher than established safety
    guidelines and specifically states: "If eight doses of
    Thimerosal-containing vaccine was given in the first
    six months of life (3 DTP, 2 HIB, and 3 Hepatitis B)
    the 200 micrograms of mercury given, say to an average
    size of 12 pounds, would be about 87 times the Swedish
    daily allowance of 2.3 micrograms for a baby of that
    size."

    The memo even warned that “the best way to go is to
    switch to dispensing the actual vaccines without
    adding preservatives.” However, it went on to point
    out the potential loss of profits and said that while
    eliminating preservatives was the best solution, there
    was “a cost consideration the head of Health Services
    has to consider. Several large ampoules or bottles are
    more expensive than a smaller number of larger
    packages.”

    Authored by Merck's then senior Vice-President,
    Maurice Hilleman, the memo was sent to Dr Gordon
    Douglas, head of the company's vaccine division. A
    disclosure of this information in 1991 could have
    prevented millions of children from being injured.

    Even after drug makers began claiming they had removed
    Thimerosal from vaccines, they left all previously
    manufactured vaccines on the market which was clearly
    deceptive to parents who believed they were injecting
    Thimerosal-free vaccines into their babies. In
    September 1999, Merck declared in a press release:
    "Now, Merck's infant vaccine line is free of all
    preservatives."

    However, On March 8, 2005, the LA Times reported,
    "Merck & Co continued to supply infant vaccine
    containing a mercury preservative for two years after
    declaring that it had eliminated the chemical."

    As it turns out, the company continued to distribute
    vaccines containing Thimerosal until October 2001,
    according to a June, 2003 FDA letter sent to Rep David
    Weldon (R-Fla), a doctor, in response to his inquiry.
    Weldon called what Merck did "misleading."

    "You had people literally into 2002 getting shots with
    mercury, having been told it was all taken out in
    1999," he told the Times.

    To this day, vaccines with full doses of Thimerosal
    are still out there. Last time I checked, I found
    products with expiration dates as late as September
    2005.

    The oft asked question is why would regulatory
    agencies allow Thimerosal to remain in vaccines? As
    usual, their initial motive was to protect the profits
    of the pharmaceutical industry that would be lost if
    the preservative was removed and packaging was limited
    to single dose vials, because many of the same
    researchers, advisory board members, and officials who
    were involved in the vaccine approval process were
    also benefiting financially from drug company money.

    An investigation by United Press International, found
    that members of the CDC's Vaccine Advisory Committee,
    received financial benefits from sharing a vaccine
    patent; owning stock in a vaccine company; payments
    for research; payments to monitor manufacturer vaccine
    tests; and funding to academic departments.

    What kind of money are we talking about here? Picture
    this. The annual global market for vaccines is
    expected to rise to $10 billion by 2006, according to
    UPI.

    However by this late date, the effort to hide the
    truth about Thimerosal by the FDA and CDC, is fueled
    by fear over the amount of money the industry, and
    quite possibly the government agencies it conspired
    with to conceal the harm, are going to end up paying
    out in law suits for injuring millions of children.

    With that in mind, officials make sure the media
    steadily repeats the mantra of a May 2004 Institute of
    Medicine report that claims there is no link between
    Thimerosal and autism. However, since that report was
    released, Steven Goodman, MD, MHS, Ph.D, an associate
    professor at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and
    member of the IOM panel, has backed off from the
    report's certainty and said:

    "It was clear from the report that we were not giving
    thimerosal a clean bill of health. Mercury is
    definitely a neurotoxin. ... We only said that the
    evidence favored that there was not a connection
    between autism and thimerosal exposure," according to
    the Naples Sun Times on April 27, 2005.

    Researcher, Mark Geier, is a doctor with a PhD in
    genetics and a court-certified expert on vaccines. He
    has determined through numerous studies that
    Thimerosal is to blame and has this to say, "the
    current epidemic of autism may well be the greatest
    iatrogenic epidemic in history. The damage already
    done to our society is already in the trillions of
    dollars. The damage of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and
    that of the AIDS epidemic pale when compared to the
    current epidemic of autism."

    Parents of injured children and tax payers are already
    paying an enormous price for this man-made epidemic.
    According to a June 19, 2002 Written Supplement to
    Oral Testimony at the Hearing of the Government Reform
    Committee, by James Bradstreet, MD, FAAFP, Clinical
    Director, The International Child Development Resource
    Center, "the cost of education, medical care, and
    therapies for behavioral and physical symptoms is
    staggering. Many of our families report having paid
    $50,000 per year to care for their child."

    "Custodial care for autism can exceed $100,000/year,"
    Bradstreet said, "The public education system is
    literally swamped with children." Schools lack the
    therapists and specially trained educators to deal
    with the epidemic.

    Back in 2002, according to Bradstreet, the Resource
    Center estimated the minimal cost to care for the
    420,000 existing children with autism to be
    $1,260,000,000,000 (based on $3 million/lifetime). So
    a little over a $1 trillion over the next 50 years
    would be required if the rising number of new cases
    ceased in 2002.

    However, because autism was doubling every four years,
    Bradstreet warned, "this is likely an overly
    conservative estimate. The societal cost could easily
    be $3-4 trillion."

    And that's just the tip of the iceberg. The amount of
    potential earnings lost as a result of the large
    number of children who will never be self-supporting
    is impossibly to calculate. Many parents are
    currently unable to work because they must stay home
    to care for a disabled child. Anything short of a
    miracle cure means these children will be disabled for
    life.

    If the Republicans succeed in passing legislation that
    will immunize vaccine makers from liability for the
    injuries they caused by Thimerosal, Americans had
    better be prepared to pay higher taxes to cover the
    cost of live-long care for the millions of kids who
    have been damaged.

    Evelyn Pringle
    epringle05ATyahoo.com

    (Evelyn Pringle is a columnist for Independent Media
    TV and an investigative journalist focused on exposing
    corruption in government)

    http://oldamericancentury.org/pring_015.htm

    http://www.independent-media.tv/grou...elyn%20Pringle

Similar Threads

  1. They Knew, But Did Nothing
    By Gold9472 in forum 9/11 Justice Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-10-2008, 02:32 PM
  2. Dangers Of A Cornered George Bush
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-27-2007, 11:34 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-30-2006, 08:20 PM
  4. Unfathomed Dangers In Patriot Act Reauthorization
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-02-2006, 10:10 PM
  5. The Dangers Of Keeping Secrets
    By Gold9472 in forum 9/11 Justice Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-28-2005, 11:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •