you have degraded many by deleting and editing others posts for disagreeing with you.Originally Posted by Gold9472
you have degraded many by deleting and editing others posts for disagreeing with you.
Granted, he has opinions. But there's also a large amount of factual information dug up thanks to research that backs up assertions of a 9/11 conspiracy. That's what I've gone by. I'm pretty sure that's what the others have gone by as well.
Tired...
Ok Jezter... you just told me that you don't believe we know the whole truth. How do you know that? What truth do you know to be missing? If, in fact, it is missing, then wouldn't that constitute a "Conspiracy"? My Goodness... I believe you are what you claim me to be. A "Conspiracy Theorist".
None of the sources that have been cited as fact can be certified as truth. How do you know these stories aren't merely stories?
I do not know if we are being told the truth or not, nor can I prove that it is the truth or not.
Tired...
No I haven't... I've deleted threads that were attack threads against me... for no other reason than to "start" something... I created this site to hopefully avoid that nonsense, but if people feel the need to do so, then there's a place for it in General. As far as editing people's posts, I edited three posts so far... one was NitaBS's because she posted something personal about me, and that's a "No No"... Two were ^^^^^^^^'s to fuck with him... One was EminemsRevenge because he posted a picture I didn't approve of... a "Beheadingesque" picture... There are rules to this board. They are there for a reason. They're not hard to follow, and in fact, if you use this board for the purposes it was meant for, you'll find that those rules are hardly rules at all.
Tired...
Name one.
All these interviews, all these articles, written by people that don't know what happened, don't even have the slightest clue to what happened. Interviews of people that never saw the whole truth and only saw what was given to them (ie. turkish translator). Nobody can prove that these stories are real and aren't just people looking for attention, and people trying to cause people like you to make up these crazy consipracies.
Tired...
But based on your logic, we should know the truth based on what we've been told "Officially". The official story is that 19 hijackers took four planes, and killed 3000+ people on 9/11. The official story is that 19 hijackers were capable of beating safeguards that have been in place for years, and have worked for years. The official story tells us that Osama Bin Laden, with the help of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, planned all of this from a cave in Afghanistan. The official story is that we "could have" prevented it, but "dropped the ball". That's awfully convenient. Especially considering how 9/11 has been used.
Okay. I think I understand.
There were no witnesses from the planes. There is no God that knows the exact story and can tell everyone. Therefore, we must look at this as a detective would examine a crime scene (HEY GOLD...CHECK ME OUT!!!! I'VE BEEN READING RUPPERT!). Because in crime cases, when there's no witnesses, you must piece together all secondary forms of evidence and build a case. That's what Michael Ruppert did in "Crossing The Rubicon"... that's the pattern I've gone by. When all this info is pieced together, you have a damning case against parts of our own gov't.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote