I didn't start with anyone... All I did was post relevant Cindy Sheehan information, and relevant 9/11 information, and relevant Iraq War Information, and relevant News, and I was banned.
Tired...
I didn't start with anyone... All I did was post relevant Cindy Sheehan information, and relevant 9/11 information, and relevant Iraq War Information, and relevant News, and I was banned.
Tired...
Here's what I think happened... there were people on that site who were screaming, "The Dancing Israelis, The Dancing Israelis" in regards to 9/11, and that it was a "Zionist Plot", and obviously Mr. Conyers doesn't want to associate himself with people against Israel, so... he banned everyone who was talking about 9/11, including me.
Not familiar with him, but he is probably a putz.
Tired...
Yes you are... Rep. John Conyers. The guy who held the "Downing Street Memo Hearings".Originally Posted by somebigguy
Tired...
You'll remember there were people at the DSM Hearings that were handing out pamphlets saying that 9/11 was a zionist act, and committed by Israel, etc...
Oh yeah???? Oh well, what are you gonna do. He probably didn't want all that nonsense on his website and you got swept up with it, like you said.
Tired...
Here's what I said to the admin..
#104
Since when did I say it was part of a "Zionist" plot? Please don't put words in my mouth. I stated earlier how influential AIPAC was, but it had nothing to do with 9/11. It's reality.
Secondly, I take NOTHING away from John Conyers. I'm simply stating a fact. If John Conyers were to stand up, and state that 9/11 needs to be re-investigated, it WOULD NOT put a bad light on him.
After all, Ray McGovern, Joe Wilson, AND Cindy Sheehan ALL question 9/11.
You can not, and SHOULD NOT stop seeking the truth, NO MATTER WHERE it leads.
All I ask is that John read a little. If after he reads, he decides to do something about it, I GUARANTEE the people will be behind him. As they have been in the past, and as they will be in the future.
PLEASE in the future DO NOT associate me with the idiot who continually posts "The Dancing Israelis".
IF Israel was involved in anyway, and again, ONLY a thorough investigation could show that, but if they were, then those in their Government involved, should be tried for crimes.
JUST LIKE anyone in OUR country involved.
In light of the fact that "Able Danger" has shown its' ugly head, I would think re-opening 9/11 should make more than enough sense.
That's just me.
Greetings all!
Well, Jonathan, I've been banned too -- probably as part of an operation that can only be called "clean-truth-sweep". Doug, Lemon and others were banned too. I suspect they'll show up on here at some point.
I don't think Rep. Conyers had anything to do with it though. the 'admin' maybe has a slightly different agenda...
Tired...
Welcome... who knows why... I can tell you that I didn't post anything on that site that wasn't "Mainstream"...
I'm taking the liberty to quote Kertis who just blasted Admin on Conyersblog.us:
"Comment #23: Kertis said on 8/26/05 @ 8:20pm ET...
Admin
You took down my entire post. I put it back. You know how to take it down again. But I put forward that it would be better for all concerned, and a more effective way to accomplish the goal you have stated, to enclose in brackets and color the text which you think offensive, and state why, so that those of us not endowed with extra-sensory perception can figure out what the heck you are talking about. The method you are using is offensive and resembles quite closely the behaivior of the President.
You have denied us the company of such personell as Constant and Researcher, the use of certian words and phrases, and the ability to explore the ramifications of certian topics, without being at all forthcoming as to your reasons or standards. You seem to believe this blog exists to provide the Congressman with a cheer squad. In contrast, many of the participants, and former participants, have the impression that the pourpose is to provide the Congressman access to a wide varity of real peoples ideas, concerns, suggetions and discoveries. Particularly the discoveries. In order that he might overlook fewer important facts.
If this is the crux of our misunderstanding, you need only clarify, and then a loyal cheer squad will be what YOU will have turned this blog into. And then Chairman Conyers will have what Rush Limbaugh has. Ditto-heads.
Addressing now the concern you specified; 1) anti-semitic or suggest anti-semitism, 2) disrespectful of other posters, or 3) advocating violence and threatening other commenters.
The part that it would seem you mean to apply to me is the second part of point one : Or suggest anti-semitism.
This is quite irritating. Is it possible that you do not understand the meaning of the phrase "entirely subjective"? I have not been disscusing "those damn Jews", nor do I recall having EVER had a poor reaction to someone, or to any number of people, based on the fact of religion or ancestry. I have been disscussing Israeli Spies. It is well understood by all that almost all Israeli Spies are Jewish, and so what? Does being Jewish make it O.K. for someone to be a foriegn Spy in the United States? Does being Jewish have anything at all to do with the fact that Isreal puts more effort into Spying in the United States than anyone puts in anywhere? Or is it rather the case that spurious charges of anti-semitism is the first layer of the armor that protects Israeli Spies from the questions which thier behaivior raises. Questions raised by thier behaivior, not thier religion or thier ancestry. Raised by thier behaivior, not thier religion or thier ancestry. Thier behaivior, not thier religion. Behaivior, not religion.
Behaivior.
Do you get it yet? I don't care if they are Jews. Why do you?
Kertis "
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote