everyone at lets roll think the pic of wtc7 from the report is fake...
http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulle...pic.php?t=9830
someone here said something lame to me when i said that the pic looks fake...
everyone at lets roll think the pic of wtc7 from the report is fake...
http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulle...pic.php?t=9830
someone here said something lame to me when i said that the pic looks fake...
And how on earth does letsroll911.org KNOW that that image is a fake?Originally Posted by 911=inside job
And why would the New York Police Department, one of the two organizations who lost the most people that day, endorse a photograph that is fake?
And if you zoom in on ANY image, you're going to see pixelation. GOD they are so stupid over there.
It doesn't matter, here is what happens to buildings that suffer a structural damage of some sort:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/buildfall6.jpg
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/buildfall2.jpg
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/buildfall7.jpg
So if some uneducated boobs are claiming this little bit of damage is responsible for the collapse, they are once again sadly misinformed.
I'm just wondering.
The top photo is actually the east corner. Not sure on the other one.
But this is the SW
http://www.wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
Pics of demolitions made to fall into each other.
Buildings topple by explosives in Yunong Village in south China's Shenzhen on Sunday May 22, 2005. The demolition, dubbed 'China's No. 1 blast' by Hong Kong media, reportedly covered an area of 51,000 square meters (57,000 square feet) the largest ever in China. [AP/Xinhua]
It doesn't matter... it's another one of those arguments that can never be won.Originally Posted by somebigguy