Because for the life of me, I CAN NOT see those people flying those maneuvers, so precisely.
Because for the life of me, I CAN NOT see those people flying those maneuvers, so precisely.
But did they get training at military flight schools? Is that how they could of flown those maneuvers?
In either scenario. They would still be alarmed at some point if the planes took over themselves(pilots?) and in the other case, they indeed did hijack the planes, spoke into recorders and were conducting a "live" excercise(vigilant guardian) as patsies or trainees. "mock terrorists".
What is on those recordings of the flight controllers?
I don't know... the air traffic controllers destroyed some recordings as well.
Stanley Hilton claims that the passengers were knocked out somehow.
I don't know if I believe Stanley Hilton. He supposedly has documentation to substantiate his claims, but where are they?
I once heard Stanley Hilton state that he had the document that authorized 9/11, signed by George W. Bush. So... where is it?
Well, that's hard, if you want to go with the Olsen cell phone story. So knocking out an entire plane seems too much work, if you are trying to formulate a patsy theory.
They could have been told that everyone knew they were just actors, " so just play along". We do have some recordings that are supposedly their voices from boston.
Either way, I'm too tired to think... Going to bed. Nite.
Visual evidence works for me.
Why can't we see the flight77 video by the citgo?
what make you believe there was any arabs on the planes at all???
they will never let us see the tape because it will show who really did everything...