[I didn't see this posted - not much new information but handy for newbies still questioning]
Has ANY Steel Builing EVER Collapsed Due To Fire...
Here's a few notes and links I made from a google search on the subject of ''Has ANY Steel Builing EVER Collapsed Due To Fire'' .... Check out the photo. Those Spaniards must have better steel and better engineers than the Americans ... maybe even Less Gravity....
Sat, 30 Jul 2005
From: "Walt.p"
http://us.altnews.com.au/drop/node/view/1450
-----------------------------
Madrid92s Towering Inferno &; The 9/11 Building Collapse Cover-Up
Prior to 9/11, no steel building had ever collapsed due to fire. Here is a photo of the smoking buildings. wtc2, was on fire for less than an hour when i t ...
http://www.infowars.com/articles/ world/madrid_towering_inferno.htm
Madrid92s Towering Inferno
Prior to 9/11, no steel building had ever collapsed due to fire. Here is a photo of the smoking buildings. wtc2, was on fire for less than an hour when it ...
http://www.global-conspiracies.com/ madrids_towering_inferno.htm
911 - The War of Terror Madrid fire heats up 9-11 debate
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/02/310898.shtml
How can a steel beamed building sustain hours and hours of fire without collapsing? Afterall, we were told that the reason the World Trade Center towers fell after only two hours was due to fire. The FEMA report and 9-11 Commission report admitted that the buildings were designed to withstand the impact from airplanes, so we were told fire was the cause of their pancake-like collapse. Now, however, that conclusion comes under even more suspicion.
http://batr.org/911/2005.02.01_arch.html
Has excellent photo of Madrid building 96 a burned out skeleton really85 This building had same design as the WTC but withstood a blazing two day fire. Maybe there is more to the WTC collapse.
PHOTO OF CHARRED SKELETON
http://judicial-inc.biz/Madrid_skyscraper.htm
PHOTO OF MADRID FIRE
http://www.infowars.com/articles/wor...ng_inferno.htm
This is a recent fire in a Venezuelan skyskraper85 it burned out of control for 17 hours, yet did not collapse.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/venezuela_fire.html
PDF Madrid92s Towering Inferno &; The 9/11 Building Collapse Cover-Up.2E. so fast?
Source: Bellaciao | February 14, 2005. Prior to 9/11, no steel building had ever collapsed due to fire. Here is. a photo of the smoking buildings. ...
http://www.fearorlove.com/Article_Feb_fire.pdf
Madrid Fire Re-opens 9/11 Questions: Why did the twin towers fall ...
Prior to 9/11, no steel building had ever collapsed due to fire.
Here is a photo of the smoking buildings. wtc2, was on fire for less than an hour when it ...
http://www.independent-media.tv/item.cfm?fmedia_ id3D10402&fcategory;_des
c3D9/11%20and%20War%20on%20Terror
Has photos 96 including a Venezuelan building that burned for 17 hours without collapsing
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/venezuela_fire.html
Independent Media TV 96 Prior to 9/11, no steel building had ever collapsed due to fire. Here is a photo of the smoking buildings. wtc2, was on fire for less than an hour when it ...
http://www.independent-media.tv/grou...field3Dsource_ desc&fvalue3DOther;&fdate;_posted3D%7Bts%2092
http://www.independent-media.tv/gtheme.cfm?ftheme_id3D1
http://www.independent-media.tv/gthe...theme_id3D1%20
BELLACIAO - Madrid Fire Re-opens 9/11
http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article3D5296
Madrid Fire Re-opens 9/11 Questions: Why did the twin towers fall so fast? 97by 91Apathy Kills92 97Madrid Fire Re-opens 9/11 Questions 93Prior to 9/11, no steel building had ever collapsed due to fire. Here is a photo of the smoking buildings. WTC2, was on fire for less than an hour when it collapsed. Isn92t it odd, the WTC collapsed after an hour, and the black smoke indicates that fire wasn92t even burning hot. Now compare- this is the Madrid Fire, it burned for 10 hours and still has not collapsed.94 Building 7
http://www.whale.to/b/building_7.html
9 Keys to 9-11
No high-rise steel building had ever collapsed due to fire, before that day. ...
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/9keys.htm
Nine Keys to 9
No high-rise steel building had ever collapsed due to fire, before that day. The official FEMA report had sparks jumping across from the Twin Towers and ...
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/ninekeysto9-11.htm
FEBRUARY 2005 ARCHIVES PART 1
http://www.freespeechradio.net/feb2005_part1.html
POETICS - 911 The Underground Verses
http://911verses.com/graphics/building7.jpg
Citizens for Legitimate Government, ...
http://www.legitgov.org/shortnews_0205_page_two.html
Did a plane actually hit the pentagon? - Rage3D Discussion Area
http://www.rage3d.net/board/showthread. php?t3D33779037&page3D4;
StangNet Forums - Reading 9/11 Report 2E.. No steel building had ever collapsed due to fire, and the main towers were built to handle a plane crash (They didn92t even visibly sway when hit by them). ...
http://forums.stangnet.net/showthrea...86709&page3D1;
http://forums.stangnet.net/showthrea...o3Dnextnewest;
MORE
The photos here are of buildings which collapsed during an earthquake. They show the typical result that occurs when a single load bearing member fails, resulting in the remains of the building tipping over and down onto the initiating point. For a building to collapse into its own footprint, as WTC 7 did, ALL the load bearing members must fail at the exact same moment. This is achieved in controlled demolitions.
Larry Silverstein, the controller of the destroyed WTC complex, stated in a PBS documentary that he and the FDNY decided jointly to demolish WTC 7 late in the afternoon of September 11, 2001.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html
The above demonstrates that WTC 7 was indeed demolished, so why did FEMA spend many hours dreaming up a report which claims the building collapsed through fire?
Popular Mechanics Attacks Its 939/11 LIES94
Straw Man by Jim Hoffman
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/index.html
Citation 93
The Hearst-owned Popular Mechanics magazine takes aim at the 9/11 Truth Movement (without ever acknowledging it by that name) with a cover story in its March 2005 edition. Sandwiched between ads and features for monster trucks, NASCAR paraphernalia, and off-road racing are twelve dense and brilliantly designed pages purporting to debunk the myths of 9/11.94
93The Popular Mechanics article gives no hint of the put options on the targeted airlines, warnings received by government and corporate officials, complicit behavior by top officials, obstruction of justice by a much larger group, or obvious frauds in the official story. Instead it attacks a mere 16 claims of its choosing, which it asserts are the 93most prevalent94 among 93conspiracy theorists.94 The claims are grouped into topics which cover some of the subjects central to the analysis of 9-11 Research. However, for each topic, the article presents specious claims to divert the reader from understanding the issue. For example, the three pages devoted to attacking the Twin Towers92 demolition present three red-herring claims and avoid the dozens of points I feature in my presentations , such as the Twin Towers92 Demolition.94
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by somebigguy
