Originally Posted by
Christophera
If they were capable of doing anything it would have been done earlier rather than allowing the nation to polarize.
New determinations of the event of 9-11 must be accepted by a majority of the people, then those in the positions you describe have leverage.
Meaning we should all promote the concept of the "Most Comprehensive 9-11 Scenario" as a contest conducted on the web with a BB having a polling feature and a strictly moderated and immediate reaction to polling responses with a special forum to discuss their decission and actions.
As 9-11 truth seekers we must unify in actions of assembling a number of people who will write email to the large non profits for'
9-11 truth
peace
freedom
justice environment
They ask for cooperation amongst the different non profits in a joint effort and combination of membership. A consolidation of those participating in petitions may be useful.
The effort becomes an escalating campaign from request to demand, for them to focus on the seriousness of non accountability as it relates to their mission statement and purpose.
Without authority, knowledge only has power over tim, unless HUGE numbers are involved. In this case authority is the problem, it is absent in the verification of information. Alternatively IF we can get a huge number to know the absolutely best and most comprehensive potential definition of events on 9-11 through the non profit action, THEN the knowledge will have meaning with numbers.
Example: I contend I have just described the best possible plan for the people, in a necesessarily grassroots manner, to actually gain accountability and eventual democratic control of America by addressing 9-11 first.
My question to Jon Gold is, "How many people will read that message in the next week and how easily will it be for them to show their approval, acceptance and support of it?