View Poll Results: Should We Arrest The Bush Administration?

Voters
23. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    20 86.96%
  • No

    3 13.04%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Should We Arrest The Bush Administration?

  1. #11
    jetsetlemming Guest
    I think I'm just about the only liberal (55% liberal, anyway) that is pro war. I mean, who cares what their reason was, it's still doing the world some good. If we've got the power and the ability to do some good, I support that. America actually helped the iraqi people, and I think that good mark is worth losing soldiers. And I have a brother in the army, and I'd probably be there now if I met the physical requirements to serve.

  2. #12
    jetsetlemming Guest
    I don't like Bush because all he did for the education problem was shell out a half-assed bill that he didn't really support anyway, and got back to what he really cared about. I think if the education system was fixed, and actually worked, that it would just about kill the drug and crime and employment issues.

  3. #13
    princesskittypoo Guest
    i have to admit i miss pres. clinton... he kept the white house lively with his sexual escapades.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,750
    Quote Originally Posted by jetsetlemming
    I think I'm just about the only liberal (55% liberal, anyway) that is pro war. I mean, who cares what their reason was, it's still doing the world some good. If we've got the power and the ability to do some good, I support that. America actually helped the iraqi people, and I think that good mark is worth losing soldiers. And I have a brother in the army, and I'd probably be there now if I met the physical requirements to serve.
    The "reason" to go to war is everything. A "pre-emptive" strike is NO different than Nazi Germany invading Poland, France, etc...

    Invading Iraq because of 9/11 (as Bush said yesterday) is like invading Mexico after Pearl Harbor.

    Granted, Saddam Hussein was a vicious man, but Iraq was in a better state of affairs before the invasion than now. Iraq has become a "Terrorist State" as a result of our invasion. I think 10 people are dying everyday on average. 10 innocent people a day.

    America has not helped Iraq. Only hurt it.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  5. #15
    somebigguy Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by princesskittypoo
    i have to admit i miss pres. clinton... he kept the white house lively with his sexual escapades.
    You're right, looking back it seemed like simpler times.

  6. #16
    princesskittypoo Guest
    yes i wish we were back to the carefreeness.

  7. #17
    AuGmENTor Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by somebigguy
    You're right, looking back it seemed like simpler times.
    They kept all the sheep watching the Idiot box, busy worrying what Billy was doing with his penis, while they set all of this other shit up. Point in case: Bill Clinton was not impeached for getting a blow-job, he was impeached for LYING! I find it amazing how many people miss this simple point! The President is the head of the BAR association. When he lies under oath, that's a problem. I could care less that he got his dick sucked under the desk, as long as he did his job. It's that he LIED about it that kills me.

  8. #18
    YouCrazyDiamond Guest
    http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/sho...hlight=impeach

    I. FAILURE TO ENSURE THE LAWS ARE FAITHFULLY EXECUTED

    (1) Self-Exemption from Laws upon Signing.

    (2) Suspension of Basic Legal Proceedings.

    (3) Promoting Illegal War.

    (4) Promoting Torture.

    (5) Promoting Kidnappings and Renditions for Torture.

    (6) Use of Illegal Weapons.

    II. ABUSE OF OFFICE AND OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

    (1) Obstructing Inquiry and Detection.

    (2) Replacing the Veto with Signing Statements.

    III. FAILURE TO PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION

    (1) Suspension of Due Process.

    (2) Unreasonable Searches and Seizures.

    (3) Non-Cooperation with Congress.

    (4) Establishment of an Unconstitutional, Parallel Legal System.

  9. #19
    AuGmENTor Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by YouCrazyDiamond
    http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/sho...hlight=impeach

    I. FAILURE TO ENSURE THE LAWS ARE FAITHFULLY EXECUTED

    (1) Self-Exemption from Laws upon Signing.

    (2) Suspension of Basic Legal Proceedings.

    (3) Promoting Illegal War.

    (4) Promoting Torture.

    (5) Promoting Kidnappings and Renditions for Torture.

    (6) Use of Illegal Weapons.

    II. ABUSE OF OFFICE AND OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

    (1) Obstructing Inquiry and Detection.

    (2) Replacing the Veto with Signing Statements.

    III. FAILURE TO PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION

    (1) Suspension of Due Process.

    (2) Unreasonable Searches and Seizures.

    (3) Non-Cooperation with Congress.

    (4) Establishment of an Unconstitutional, Parallel Legal System.
    Amen... so lets go get this motherbleeper.

  10. #20
    AuGmENTor Guest
    I'm still waiting.... When do we arrest them? And who does it? Isn't there enough proof yet? Haven't the articles of impeachment been filed? I thought I read in here that they were.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-23-2009, 02:16 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-13-2007, 08:28 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-29-2005, 01:22 AM
  4. Dutch Court Refuses To Arrest Bush
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-05-2005, 10:17 PM
  5. Bush arrest when visiting Holland in May?
    By OrlandoMary in forum The New News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-14-2005, 03:52 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •