National Teachers Association Snubs Bush On 'Intelligent Design'

[Gold9472]

National Teachers Association snubs Bush on 'intelligent design'

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Nation...ent__0803.html

The National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), the world's largest organization of science educators, said they were "stunned and disappointed" that President Bush endorsed the teaching of intelligent design earlier this week, inviting Biblical creationism into American science classrooms, RAW STORY has learned.

They issued this release today, calling intelligent design "pseudoscience."

#

"We stand with the nation's leading scientific organizations and scientists, including Dr. John Marburger, the president's top science advisor, in stating that intelligent design is not science. Intelligent design has no place in the science classroom," said Gerry Wheeler, NSTA Executive Director.

Monday, Knight Ridder news service reported that the President favors the teaching of intelligent design "so people can understand what the debate is about."

"It is simply not fair to present pseudoscience to students in the science classroom," said NSTA President Mike Padilla. "Nonscientific viewpoints have little value in increasing students' knowledge of the natural world."

NSTA strongly supports the premise that evolution is a major unifying concept in science and should be included in the K-12 education frameworks and curricula. This position is consistent with that of the National Academies, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and many other scientific and educational organizations.

The Arlington, VA-based National Science Teachers Association is the largest professional organization in the world promoting excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all. NSTA's current membership includes more than 55,000 science teachers, science supervisors, administrators, scientists, business and industry representatives, and others involved in science education.

[jetsetlemming]

Not that I'm religous or anything, but I don't like how much they are flouting around a theory. There's some good evidence, but its not rock solid.

[jetsetlemming]

And anyway, what's the freakin' problem with presenting more than one theory? Almost every religon on earth goes by intelligent design, and its not like their saying evolution shouldn't be teached (they gave up on that mainstream in the eighties).