Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Invading Iraq After 9/11 Is Like Invading Mexico After Pearl Harbor

  1. #11
    Good Doctor HST Guest
    Presidents have declared war on Germany, Japan; Korea; and Vietnam without Congress's prior approval. They just go with the flow. Include Desert Storm too. Congress surrendered wartime decisions to the Executive Branch. I honestly don't know the logistics; I just know what I've seen on the internet and different books.

    Or, check out this from MSN Encarta on who can declare war:

    "The president of the United States has no clear constitutional authority to declare war without congressional approval. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has determined that the president, as commander-in-chief of the military, does have the authority to recognize a "state of war" initiated against the United States and may in these circumstances unilaterally send U.S. troops into battle. President Bush has also stated that his powers as commander-in-chief allow him to act independently in defense of the nation.

    The president did not seek a formal declaration of war from Congress. But he did seek congressional support, he said, to demonstrate to the United Nations and to the world that military action against Iraq was not just his own objective; it was a view supported by the American electorate as a whole. Strategically, support from the legislators bolstered the president's case as he pressed the UN Security Council for a resolution authorizing military force in Iraq."

    ......Um..... can somebody say dictatorial powers?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Did you see what I posted on the previous page?
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Heh... I think we got our information from the same place...
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Does what the Supreme Court say supercede the actual law?
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    The Supreme Court stated VERY recently that they didn't want to overturn the law in regards to Medicinal Marijuana because it was Congress' responsibility...
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  6. #16
    Good Doctor HST Guest
    It looks like a dangerous precedent was set during the Korean War, when Dean Acheson convinced jelly-spine Truman that the U.N. was the way to go in securing war with North Korea, instead of Congress. Congress finally let the Executives run things, and we've never looked back.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    But I thought the law I just posted said the President can only declare "war" for 60 days, and then needs to seek Congress' approval?
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  8. #18
    Good Doctor HST Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Gold9472
    The Supreme Court stated VERY recently that they didn't want to overturn the law in regards to Medicinal Marijuana because it was Congress' responsibility...
    Neither side wants to look bad. Therefore, blame must be squarely placed anywhere besides whoever's placing said blame.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Quote Originally Posted by Good Doctor HST
    Neither side wants to look bad. Therefore, blame must be squarely placed anywhere besides whoever's placing said blame.
    Right... but I'm saying that what's good for one law isn't good for another... they're being hypocritical.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  10. #20
    Good Doctor HST Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Gold9472
    But I thought the law I just posted said the President can only declare "war" for 60 days, and then needs to seek Congress' approval?
    Answer to your question, from CNN archives:

    How do they do it (declare war)? They issue a report "consistent with" the resolution rather than "pursuant to" it, and claim that whatever actions they have so far taken have not triggered the 60 day grace period. They maintain, in short, that a war is not a war in order to bypass the statute.
    While Presidents acknowledge the War Powers Resolution's existence, none have conceded its constitutionality -- because to concede it would be to limit their own power and increase that of Congress. And the federal judiciary has avoided becoming part of this political struggle between its co-equal branches -- leaving presidents to do what they like, without having to appear before any court other than that of public opinion to justify their actions.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-16-2007, 09:43 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-21-2005, 07:40 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-04-2005, 12:23 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-17-2005, 12:05 AM
  5. Memo to Bush: The case for invading Canada
    By somebigguy in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-01-2005, 09:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •