Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: The Downing Street Memo Story Won't Die

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,718

    The Downing Street Memo Story Won't Die

    The Downing Street Memo Story Won't Die

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...700474_pf.html

    By Jefferson Morley
    Tuesday, June 7, 2005; 9:18 AM

    More than a month after its publication, the so-called Downing Street Memo remains among the top 10 most viewed articles on The Times of London site.

    It's not hard to see why this remarkable document, published in The Times on May 1 (and reported in this column on May 3), continues to attract reader interest around the world, especially with British Prime Minister Tony Blair visiting Washington Tuesday.

    The July 2002 memo, labeled "SECRET AND STRICTLY PERSONAL - UK EYES ONLY," reports the views of "C," code name for Richard Dearlove, the chief of British intelligence. Dearlove had just retuned from a visit with Bush administration officials eight months before the war in Iraq began.

    "Military action was now seen as inevitable," Dearlove told Blair and his senior defense policy advisers. "Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

    A separate secret briefing paper for the meeting said Britain and the United States had to "create" conditions to justify a war.

    The story attracted some news coverage in the United States, but not much. Last month, the Chicago Tribune concluded that "the Downing Street memo story has proven to be something of a dud in the United States.

    "The White House has denied the premise of the memo, the American media have reacted slowly to it and the public generally seems indifferent to the issue or unwilling to rehash the bitter prewar debate over the reasons for the war," wrote reporters Stephen J. Hedges and Mark Silva.

    Still the story won't go away, thanks to the attention it gets on the Internet.

    "I think it's a . . . profoundly important document that raises stunning issues here at home," Sen. John Kerry told a Massachusetts audience last week. "And it's amazing to me the way it escaped major media discussion. It's not being missed on the Internet, I can tell you that."

    Kerry promised to raise the issue when he returned to Washington this week.

    On Sunday, "Meet the Press" host Tim Russert asked Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman about the memo. Mehlman said "that report has been discredited by everyone else who's looked at it since then."

    When Russert noted that the authenticity of the report has not been discredited, Mehlman said "I believe that the findings of the report, the fact that the intelligence was somehow fixed have been totally discredited by everyone who's looked at it."

    Mehlman referred specifically to the Senate Intelligence Committee's July 2004 report on pre-war assessments of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which concluded that the Bush administration's findings were "overstated" and "not supported by the underlying intelligence reporting." The report attributed the mistakes to "group think" in the intelligence community, not to pressure from the administration officials.

    The Post's Walter Pincus reported on the memo in a May 13 story, noting that Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) had written a letter to President Bush, signed by 88 congressional Democrats, demanding an explanation.

    A week later, The Times of London reported on the Conyers letter and quoted the Michigan congressman as saying, "I deplore the fact that our media have been so reticent on the question of whether there was a secret planning of a war for which neither the Congress nor the American people had given permission."

    "We have The Sunday Times to thank for this very important activity. It reminds me of Watergate, which started off as a tiny little incident reported in The Washington Post. I think that the interest of many citizens is picking up," Conyers said.

    So is journalistic interest. Over the weekend, Charles Hanley, a special correspondent for the Associated Press, linked The Times's Downing Street memo to U.N. Ambassador nominee John Bolton's effort to get a U.N. weapons inspector fired.

    "Bolton flew to Europe in 2002 to confront the head of a global arms-control agency and demand he resign, then orchestrated the firing of the unwilling diplomat in a move a U.N. tribunal has since judged unlawful, according to officials involved, " Hanley said in a story published this weekend by The Guardian in London and carried by Canadian TV.

    The dismissal, Hanley says, was part of the Bush administration effort to control intelligence findings on Iraq.

    Jose Bustani, the head of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), "had to go" according to one of Bolton's aides, because he was trying to send chemical weapons inspectors to Baghdad. The course of action favored by Bustani might "have helped defuse the crisis over alleged Iraqi weapons and undermined a U.S. rationale for war," Hanley wrote.

    Bustani was relieved of his position in April 2002 at an OPCW meeting attended by only one third of the group's member nations, according to the AP report.

    "The Iraq connection to the OPCW affair comes as fresh evidence surfaces that the Bush administration was intent from early on to pursue military and not diplomatic action against Saddam Hussein's regime," Hanley wrote. He cited the Times's original Downing Street memo story, which reported that Blair told Bush that Britain would support a U.S.-led invasion of Iraq at a meeting in Crawford, Tex., in mid-April 2002.

    "Two weeks later, Bustani was ousted, with British help," Hanley wrote.

    Far from being a dud, the Downing Street Memo may generate more stories to come.

    Sehrish Shaban and Mary Specht provided research for this column.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  2. #2
    somebigguy Guest
    Good, and it shouldn't go away. Finally something getting some long term exposure.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,718
    That's only because we're helping to make that the case... the so called, "news" organizations let this story drop with one story each.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  4. #4
    somebigguy Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Gold9472
    That's only because we're helping to make that the case... the so called, "news" organizations let this story drop with one story each.
    I dig, what ever the reason, I'm glad something is finally sticking.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,718
    Quote Originally Posted by somebigguy
    I dig, what ever the reason, I'm glad something is finally sticking.
    Hey man...

    "you have informed yourself many many times more than Jon Gold"

    Good job.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  6. #6
    somebigguy Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Gold9472
    Hey man...

    "you have informed yourself many many times more than Jon Gold"

    Good job.
    Thanks dude!!!

    What do you mean????

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,718
    Quote Originally Posted by somebigguy
    Thanks dude!!!

    What do you mean????
    The lastest from the email chain that refuses to die... because of those idiots.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  8. #8
    somebigguy Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Gold9472
    The lastest from the email chain that refuses to die... because of those idiots.
    OH, they still at it?? I sent a couple of replies in...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,718
    Quote Originally Posted by somebigguy
    OH, they still at it?? I sent a couple of replies in...
    Yep... they're still at it. It occured to me what Nico Haupt, Gerald Holmgren, Rosalee Grable, and Jeff Strahl are...

    They are "Neocons" in "9/11 Truther" garb, or "Neo-Truthers"...

    It's not that they're not interested in what happened on that day, but...

    Imagine liberal, and conservative individuals in the 9/11 Truth Movement. Two different types of individuals focusing on the same thing, just different aspects of it. Because liberals are known to be more passive than aggressive, you get people like you, me, etc... Because conservatives are more aggressive than passive, you get people like the four I mentioned. That's why their tactics are so familiar.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,718
    Also... some may be "plants"... but who knows... and who wants to become that paranoid, etc...
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


Similar Threads

  1. Do You Know What The Downing Street Memo Is?
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-18-2007, 10:08 AM
  2. What Happened To The Downing Street Memo?
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-17-2005, 10:55 AM
  3. Karl Rove Q & A On Hardball - Downing Street Memo
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-22-2005, 04:32 PM
  4. The Smoking Gun: Downing Street Memo Video
    By beltman713 in forum The New News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-15-2005, 09:36 PM
  5. 'Downing Street Memo'' Gets Fresh Attention
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-12-2005, 07:41 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •