9/11's lingering questions
OUR OPINION: Public deserves answers about Sarasota connection
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/09/1...questions.html
Reports of a previously unknown Saudi connection to the events of 9/11 in Florida cry out for a full airing. There are simply too many troubling questions surrounding the mystery of a hastily-abandoned house in Sarasota days before the attacks to sweep this matter under the rug.
The three-bedroom home in an upscale, gated residential compound was owned by a Saudi financier whose daughter, son-in-law and two young children lived there. They left a few days before 19 terrorists - 15 of whom were Saudis - carried out the plot to attack targets in this country. They left behind three cars, rooms of expensive furniture, food supplies, and other evidence of an abrupt exit, including clothes hanging in the closets, dirty diapers, mail left on the table and so forth.
More worrisome, they also had ties to the al Qaida terrorists. FBI agents, acting on a tip from a neighbor weeks later, found gate logs of vehicle tags showing that a car owned by hijacker Mohamed Atta had visited the compound. More information indicated that he and Ziad Jarrah, another hijacker, were in the car. Agents reportedly linked phone calls from the house to the Saudi attackers.
On Thursday, the FBI issued a statement saying it had followed up the information on the Sarasota house and "there was no connection found to the 9/11 plot." The bureau said it had informed Congress and the 9/11 Commission about its investigation.
That should not be the end of it, however. If there was an investigation, when did it end and what did they find? Who did they tell? What about the visits and phone calls? What was the nature of the connection between the hijackers and those who owned the house and lived there? There may be an explanation without connection to al Qaida, but after 10 years the public deserves answers.
Former Florida Sen. Bob Graham, who chaired the congressional investigation into the hijackings, emphatically disputes the assertion that the FBI informed Congress. That, too, should be cleared up. U.S. Rep. Kathy Castor, whose district includes Sarasota, has asked the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee to investigate, and Mr. Graham has asked President Obama's counterterrorism advisor to pursue the matter. Both of those requests should be honored in order to get a public accounting of what this all means.
The Saudi connection to the events of 9/11 has always been a matter of speculation and controversy. Over the years, the Saudi kingdom has itself come under attack by al Qaida terrorists. Its authorities have worked to diminish the influence of Islamic extremism, reportedly updating the scholastic curriculum to eliminate textbook references to jihad, slaying infidels and so forth, and hosting conferences of Islamic scholars to denounce terrorism.
That's progress. Unfortunately, some prominent Saudi officials still don't seem to get it. In an opinion article in The New York Times earlier this week, Prince Turki al-Faisal, a former Saudi ambassador to the United States and former director of its intelligence services, bluntly warned that U.S. failure to support the Palestinian bid for statehood at the United Nations would be a mistake. The headline: "Veto a state, lose an ally."
A proper regard for the lingering pain of Americans would dictate that the Saudis, of all people, should know better than to issue threats to this country on the anniversary of 9/11.
Ten years later, much about the Saudi connection remains unknown. An investigation prompted by the Sarasota connection would help to clarify matters.