We Have Been Reduced To A Theory
Has anyone noticed that the media likes to pounce on our theories? Everytime someone writes a "hit piece", they focus on two theories presented by the 9/11 Truth Movement:
- The World Trade Center was brought down by Controlled Demolition.
- The Pentagon was not hit by Flight 77.
In the early beginnings of this movement, certain facts stood out that made people question what really happened on 9/11.
Some of these facts include:
- Excessive "put options" purchased on American and United days before 9/11.
- A $100,000 wire transfer from the Pakistani ISI to Mohammad Atta.
- The absence of our military.
- The Secret Service not doing their job in regards to the President.
- Warnings from 14 different countries about the impending attacks.
- The August 6th, PDB.
- Whistleblowers like Coleen Rawley, Robert Wright, and Sibel Edmonds.
Obviously,
A LOT can be added to that list. The point in showing it to you is that each and every one of those facts are indisputable. You can't write a "hit piece" saying how crazy and nutty the 9/11 Truth Movement is because of that information. In fact, you would be hard pressed to find any "journalist" write about that information.
Over the last few years, the movement has moved away from that information in favor of promoting our theories. We took it upon ourselves to figure out what happened on 9/11 because our Government wasn't willing to tell us. Some theories are more sound than others. In fact, World Trade Center 7 was most likely brought down by controlled demolition. If you look at the information Dr. Griffin, and Professor Jones bring to the table, it's very difficult to argue their conclusions.
However, as I said, Controlled Demolition is a theory. Professor Jones claims he has a piece of steel from the WTC that has traces of thermate, but until he can prove that conclusively, the idea of Controlled Demolition is still a theory.
You could come up with 1000 theories about what happened on 9/11, and never find out what happened, and have 1000 "hit pieces" written about you. Or, you could produce a few facts that conflict with the 9/11 Commission's report, and watch the fireworks fly.
Recently, it was
discovered that "audiotapes provided to the commission by Norad demonstrated widespread confusion within the military on the morning of the attacks, with many air-defense commanders uncertain whether the reports of the hijackings
were part of an unannounced military exercise."
That is conclusive proof that the Wargames that were taking place on 9/11 had something to do with the absence of our military. Add that to the fact that the 9/11 Commission didn't bother addressing the 5+ Wargames taking place that morning, and instead mentioned only 1 in a footnote in the back of the book. That is a verifiable "Cover-Up". Something tangible, and something proveable.
They laugh at our theories. They run away from our facts. Please keep that in mind.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Gold9472
