Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Landing By Remote Control Doesn't Quite Fly With Pilots

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749

    Landing By Remote Control Doesn't Quite Fly With Pilots

    Landing by remote control doesn't quite fly with pilots

    By Jeff Long
    Tribune staff reporter
    Published September 28, 2001

    The military has been flying planes and landing them safely by remote control for years, but airline pilots say questions about security must be answered before that technology is used aboard commercial jetliners to thwart hijackers the way President Bush suggested Thursday during a speech in Chicago.

    "We will look at all kinds of technologies to make sure that our airlines are safe," Bush said at O'Hare International Airport. "... including technology to enable controllers to take over distressed aircraft and land it by remote control."

    Pilots said after the speech that though they support other proposals for airplane security that Bush outlined, the idea of aircraft being remotely controlled concerns them.

    "If the good guys can take control of the plane" from the ground, said John Mazor, a spokesman for the Air Line Pilots Association, "maybe the bad guys can take control of it too."

    Taking control of a hijacked aircraft from the ground appears to be less feasible than other measures, he said.

    "We would view that as a very--very--long-term type of undertaking," Mazor said. "There are enormous technical difficulties in trying to rig up an aircraft for that."

    But companies that have designed such systems for the military say it wouldn't be difficult to adapt the technology for commercial aircraft.

    General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. developed a remote-controlled reconnaissance plane for the Air Force called Predator, which flew in Bosnia during the conflict there. Used by the military since 1994, it can be landed by pilots linked by satellite using controls on the ground or ordering an onboard computer to do the job.

    Tom Cassidy, president and CEO of the San Diego company, said he sent Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta a letter shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks.

    "Such a system would not prevent a hijacker from causing mayhem on the aircraft or exploding a device and destroying the aircraft in flight," the letter said, "but it would prevent him from flying the aircraft into a building or populated areas."

    Cassidy said Thursday that a pilot aboard a commercial airliner could turn the plane's guidance over to ground controllers at the press of a button, preventing a hijacker--or anyone else aboard--from flying the plane.

    That system also would keep people on the ground from taking control of a plane away from the pilot, Cassidy said, because the pilot would first have to give up control.

    Aircraft anywhere in the nation could be remotely controlled from just one or two locations using satellite links, Cassidy said. Those locations could be heavily fortified against terrorists.

    "The technology is available," Cassidy said. "We use it every day."

    Copyright © 2001, Chicago Tribune
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  2. #2
    somebigguy Guest
    But companies that have designed such systems for the military say it wouldn't be difficult to adapt the technology for commercial aircraft.

    Yeah, no doubt.

Similar Threads

  1. Picture of landing gear at Pentagon
    By simuvac in forum 9/11 Justice Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-10-2007, 09:51 PM
  2. RAF Pilots Asked To Think Of Being Kamikaze Pilots
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-04-2007, 08:37 PM
  3. Russian Airliner Crashes On Landing In Siberia
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-09-2006, 02:38 PM
  4. 9/11 jets remote controlled, not hijacked...
    By BoneZ in forum 9/11 Justice Forum
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 04-09-2006, 08:26 PM
  5. Where's The Remote Control?
    By Gold9472 in forum 9/11 Justice Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-13-2006, 08:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •