Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: AIPAC has spoken

  1. #1
    simuvac Guest

    AIPAC has spoken

    Goodnight, America, wherever you are.

    Bush Attorney General Nominee Gets Boost

    WASHINGTON — Michael Mukasey drew closer to becoming attorney general Friday after two key Senate Democrats said they would vote for him despite his refusal to say whether waterboarding is torture.

    The decision by Sens. Charles Schumer and Dianne Feinstein to back President Bush's nominee came shortly after the chairman of the committee, Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., announced he would vote against Mukasey, a former federal judge.

    "This is an extremely difficult decision," Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement, adding that Mukasey "is not my ideal choice."

    In announcing her support for Mukasey, Feinstein, D-Calif., said "first and foremost, Michael Mukasey is not Alberto Gonzales," referring to the former attorney general who resigned in September after months of questions about his honesty.

    Including Leahy, five of the Judiciary Committee's 10 Democrats had said they would vote against Mukasey's confirmation after the nominee earlier this week refused to say that waterboarding, an interrogation technique that simulates drowning, is torture and therefore illegal.

    But with nine Republicans on the panel, Schumer and Feinstein's support for Mukasey virtually guarantees that a majority of the committee will recommend his confirmation when it votes on it next Tuesday.

    Leaders in both parties have said they expect Mukasey to get at least 70 votes when the full, 100-member Senate votes on his confirmation. But Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., had said he would not bring it up for a vote without Judiciary Committee action first.

    Schumer's announcement followed a private meeting Friday with Mukasey to discuss waterboarding.

    "I deeply oppose it," Schumer said of waterboarding. "Unfortunately, this nominee, indeed any proposed by President Bush, will not agree with this. I am, however, confident that this nominee would enforce a law that bans waterboarding."

    Schumer, who was Mukasey's chief Democratic sponsor, said the retired judge told him that if Congress passes a law banning waterboarding "the president would have absolutely no legal authority to ignore such a law." Schumer said Mukasey said he would enforce any congressional ban on the controversial interrogation method.

    Human Rights Watch called Schumer and Feinstein's support for Mukasey "extremely disappointing." Jennifer Daskal, the group's senior counterterrorism counsel, criticized the two senators for "supporting a nominee for the position of America's chief law enforcement officer who refuses to call waterboarding, which has been prosecuted as torture for over a hundred years, illegal."

    "Mukasey appears more interested in protecting administration officials from possible prosecution than in providing a straight answer on the law _ hardly the kind of independent legal adviser that America needs," Daskal said.

    Additionally, the American Civil Liberties Union urged its supporters to call their senators and demand a vote against Mukasey.

    Torture is considered a war crime by the international community and waterboarding has been banned by the U.S. military, but CIA interrogators are believed to have used the technique on terror detainees as recently as a few years ago.

    Mukasey has called waterboarding personally "repugnant," and in a letter to senators this week said he did not know enough about how it has been used to define it as torture. He also said he thought it would be irresponsible to discuss it since doing so could make interrogators and other government officials vulnerable to lawsuits.

    Early Friday, Bush renewed his plea for Mukasey's confirmation.

    "He's a good man. He's a fair man. He's an independent man, and he's plenty qualified to be attorney general," Bush said of Mukasey, just after landing in Columbia, S.C., on his way to a political fundraiser and to give a speech at Fort Jackson.

    On Thursday, Bush had warned that the Justice Department would go without a leader in a time of war if Democrats thwarted Mukasey.

    Bush also said that if the Judiciary Committee were to block Mukasey because of his noncommittal stance on the legality of waterboarding, it would set a new standard for confirmation that could not be met by any responsible nominee for attorney general.

  2. #2
    PhilosophyGenius Guest
    I'm dissapointed in Fienstein, she also supported giving up fighting the 04 election results.

  3. #3
    simuvac Guest

    Judiciary Panel Approves Mukasey

    Judiciary Panel Approves Mukasey

    By LAURIE KELLMAN Associated Press Writer

    Nov 6th, 2007 | WASHINGTON -- The Judiciary Committee advanced Attorney General designate Michael Mukasey's nomination to the Senate floor Tuesday, virtually ensuring confirmation for a former judge ensnarled in bitter controversy over terrorism-era prisoner interrogations.

    The 11-8 vote came only after two key Democrats accepted his assurance to enforce any law Congress might enact against waterboarding.

    However, committee Chairman Patrick Leahy called Mukasey's promise disingenuous. "Unsaid, of course, is the fact that any such prohibition would have to be enacted over the veto of this president," said Leahy, D-Vt.

    Sen. Chuck Schumer, who suggested Mukasey to the White House in the first place, countered that the nominee's statements against waterboarding and for purging politics from the Justice Department amount to the best deal Democrats could get from the Bush administration.

    "If we block Judge Mukasey's nomination and then learn in six months that waterboarding has continued unabated, that victory will seem much less valuable," he wrote in an op-ed in Tuesday's editions of The New York Times.

    Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said her vote for Muksaey's confirmation came down in part to practicality. If Mukasey's nomination were killed, she said, Bush would install an acting attorney general not subject to Senate confirmation and make recess appointments to fill nearly a dozen other empty jobs at the top of Justice.

    "I don't believe a leaderless department is in the best interests of the American people or of the department itself," Feinstein said. Bush, she added, "appointed this man because he believes he is mainstream."

    Support for Mukasey from Schumer and Feinstein virtually assured the former federal judge the majority vote he needed to be favorably recommended by the 19-member committee. He was expected to win confirmation handily, and the vote is likely before Thanksgiving.

    Many Democrats came out in opposition to Mukasey after he refused to say unequivocably that so-called waterboarding — an interrogation technique that makes the victim believe he is drowning — is tantamount to torture and thus illegal under domestic and international law.

    Mukasey rankled Democrats during his confirmation hearing by saying he was not familiar with the waterboarding technique and could not say whether it was torture.

    Even Sen. Arlen Specter, the panel's ranking Republican, called that explanation "a flimsy excuse" and suggested instead that Muksaey declined to call waterboarding illegal torture because he wanted to avoid putting at legal risk U.S. officials who may have engaged in the practice.

    But Specter, of Pennsylvania, said that outlawing waterboarding rests with Congress. He revealed that he had talked with Mukasey a day earlier and received an assurance that the nominee would back up any such legislation and quit if Bush ignores his opinion.

    Thus, Specter said, Mukasey had won his support.

    Legal experts cautioned that if Mukasey called it torture, that effectively could have constituted an admission that the United States engaged in war crimes. It could also commit him to prosecuting U.S. officials even before he takes office.

Similar Threads

  1. Aipac's hidden persuaders
    By simuvac in forum The New News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-20-2009, 08:40 PM
  2. This has to stop....AIPAC owns us
    By MrDark71 in forum The New News
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-13-2007, 10:38 PM
  3. Feds Probe A Top Democrat's Relationship With AIPAC
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-23-2006, 08:45 AM
  4. AIPAC Case Reaches Plea Bargain
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-29-2005, 08:43 PM
  5. What Is AIPAC?
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-20-2005, 08:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts