Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Kremlin Fury At US Demand Over Baltic Wartime Pact

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749

    Kremlin Fury At US Demand Over Baltic Wartime Pact

    Kremlin fury at US demand over Baltic wartime pact
    By Julius Strauss in Moscow and Alec Russell in Washington

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...6/ixworld.html

    A White House demand that Russia face up to its Stalinist past is fuelling a diplomatic spat ahead of President George W Bush's visit this weekend to commemorate the end of the Second World War.

    Mr Bush's four-day visit to Russia and two of its former Soviet satellites is shaping up to be one of the most fraught missions of his presidency.

    It emerged in Washington that the US had tried to persuade President Vladimir Putin to repudiate the 1939 Nazi-Soviet agreement, which led to the annexation of the three Baltic States.

    This demand - curtly rejected by the Kremlin - added fuel to a row which has pitted Russia against the Baltic states and the European Union and threatens to cast a shadow over the 60th anniversary of the end of the war.

    Russian officials were already fuming that Mr Bush is pointedly going to Latvia tomorrow ahead of his appearance at the grand victory parade in Red Square on Monday. Mr Bush, asked in an interview with Lithuanian television whether he would raise the subject of the occupation of the Baltics with Mr Putin, said: "Yes, of course I will remind him of that."

    At a briefing for reporters ahead of Mr Bush's departure, his national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, pointedly reiterated the demand for a renunciation of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact.

    Russia maintains that demands for an apology from the Baltic states are an insult to the estimated 25 million Russian soldiers and civilians who died after Hitler invaded Russia.

    Sergei Yastrzhembsky, Russia's point man on relations with the EU, claimed yesterday that the Red Army was welcomed into the Baltics.

    He said: "One cannot use the term occupation to describe these historical events. At that time, the troop deployment took place on an agreed basis and with the clearly expressed agreement of the existing authorities in the Baltic republics. There was no occupation of foreign territory seized by military means."

    He accused the Baltic states of trying to poison relations between Russia and the EU, its biggest trading partner.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  2. #2
    pcteaser Guest
    Is it possible for Dubya to go anywhere and NOT piss somebody off?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-21-2008, 02:44 PM
  2. U.S. Rejects Kremlin's Call To Scrap Missile Shield
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-14-2008, 09:44 AM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-02-2008, 07:49 PM
  4. North Korea Launches Wartime Alert
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-19-2006, 03:09 PM
  5. Kevin Barett vs the fury of ignorance
    By borepstein in forum 9/11 Justice Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-14-2006, 12:19 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •