Quote Originally Posted by psikeyhackr
My point is I am not talking about Controlled Demolition. I am talking about the effects of a 200 ton mass on a 500,000 ton vertical structure and what it cannot possibly do that structure. But to do the analysis properly you need to know the distribution of steel and concrete.

A second factor is the quantity of steel at the point of impact. If there were 900 tons of steel on the 3 floors where the plane hit the south tower shouldn't it take longer than 56 minutes to weaken? A lot longer?

What people think caused it if they understand that the planes could not is no concern of mine. But we should have had the tons of steel and tons of concret on each floor information within 6 weeks of 9/11.

I am tired of this sh!t dragging on and on and.... I usually like watching Bill Maher but he pissed me off with that crap.



Is that plane so huge compared to the building it supposdly leveled?

Then how did the Hiroshima Memorial withstand an A-bomb detonation?



http://www.galenfrysinger.com/abomb_dome_hiroshima.htm

psik
It's the funniest fuckin thing.... If you aren't talking about CD, then what ARE you talking about? I don't know you. But if you call me another name, I'll make sure it is your swan song. I will not say I have never called someone a name in here, but it was always a reply to having been called one. Now, do you care to explain what you are talking about, sans insults? To me, it doesn't matter if the structural steel, concrete was turned into silly putty by space beams. I don't need to know the root cause of the collapses to know there was a cover-up. You were fgone for a while, maybe you want to see where things have gone here. There are forums that will be happy to have a guy like you!