Yes, you gave me links...you gaves me a hundred links to a hundred different articles.....you are not listening. No one wants to read for hours on end when someone else has already done it. You are one of the experts on this topic...you are suppose to be able to pin point the most factually based evidence and which ones help your cause the most. If you can't see that then I don't even know what to say. If you don't know what your most credible evidence is then I am udderly confused.
OK... as a voice of reason, this thread will now work this way... State your question (one at a time) and we will move on when YOU have had it answered to your satisfaction. GO!
This actually would have been a nice approach in the beginning but now I just feel that the people I have met so far on this forum do nothing but want to run people away whenever they question their beliefs......it's a bunch of christians lol Look I finally took a shot at someone.Originally Posted by AuGmENTor
Ask ONE question: We will NOT move on till it has been answered to YOUR satisfaction.
Tired...
What are my ideas? That there is a cover-up? That the Bush Administration and others are guilty of those crimes? The hours you don't want to "waste", I spent reading each and every one of those articles. Sibel Edmonds is a cover-up. I showed you that. That is a "concrete point." Pakistan's relationship to 9/11 is a cover-up, and a "concrete point." Unfortunately, I don't have a document that says the Bush Administration planned, and orchestrated the attacks of 9/11, nor do I have one for anyone else. I did, however, "waste" my time reading, and have come to the conclusion that the Bush Administration are suspects for the crimes of 9/11. That is why I am here. You can "waste" your time or not. Don't expect a movie to tell you everything. Paul Thompson, himself, says that in the film.
I'm not suggesting from this that Pakistan is the quote unquote "solution" to 9/11 because it's not. Pakistan is one part in a very complicated story. The question to me is who else was involved with Al-Qaeda? Was Al-Qaeda used as a tool just as in the 1980's the Mujahadeen were basically used by the U.S. Government?
I come off as a bit crass. Thats just how it is. Gold was very accomodating to you at the start. Personally, I could care less if you continue or not. Life goes on if you decide not to stay here. I reigned myself in, and tried a new tact. If it's too late, worse things have happened than a pseudointellectual leaving in a huff. Call it your hazing. Try again tomorrow. Jon is MIA, and I have had my fill. This whole forum is a little vitual home for us. There are other things to talk about in here. I have been posting in ten threads on three boards in the time that has elapsed here. If you would like to start fresh tomorrow, GREAT It was fun beating you up. If not, while I am not positive, I am pretty sure the sun will come up in the morning. Ciao.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote