Some wonderments?

[the_goldenhand]

I can not explain how mind crazy this is. An open mind doesn't mean your going to believe in everything you hear. I looked at both sides and I told you what came to mind and quite frankly you didn't really explain some of my points away.

A: Why did Bush not even want to have an investigation into the biggest act of terrorism in the history of the US?
B: Why did Bush and Cheney refuse to testify seperately and under oath?

This question I wondered about while I was watching the press for truth. I thought of a few reasons why it would make sense for him not to. The first one that came to mind seemed very simple. If of course you don't already believe he is the one that created the whole thing. It would make sense that seeing as how he did have hints that plots using planes for terrorism was possible and that al quada were the ones included in these hints. That he didn't see the use in creating an investigation because it seemed completely obvious to him who done it. It may have been a simple waste of time and money.

B: Why wouldn't they testify seperately and under oath? What would they be afraid of even if they were the ones behind it all. Also, there are plenty of political reasons why you would want to be interviewed for something like that behind closed doors. It's a sensitive issue and could be damaging even if you weren't plotting against you own country. It could just reveal your complete unawareness and uselessness as a leader. I am getting really tired. I will listen to anything that makes sense that is what I like. You have made fun of me, called me a moron, while I have been completely polite and patient. You know why I have been that way? It's because I was expecting it.

[Gold9472]

I can not explain how mind crazy this is. An open mind doesn't mean your going to believe in everything you hear. I looked at both sides and I told you what came to mind and quite frankly you didn't really explain some of my points away.

A: Why did Bush not even want to have an investigation into the biggest act of terrorism in the history of the US?
B: Why did Bush and Cheney refuse to testify seperately and under oath?

This question I wondered about while I was watching the press for truth. I thought of a few reasons why it would make sense for him not to. The first one that came to mind seemed very simple. If of course you don't already believe he is the one that created the whole thing. It would make sense that seeing as how he did have hints that plots using planes for terrorism was possible and that al quada were the ones included in these hints. That he didn't see the use in creating an investigation because it seemed completely obvious to him who done it. It may have been a simple waste of time and money.

BWAHAHAHA!!!

B: Why wouldn't they testify seperately and under oath? What would they be afraid of even if they were the ones behind it all. Also, there are plenty of political reasons why you would want to be interviewed for something like that behind closed doors. It's a sensitive issue and could be damaging even if you weren't plotting against you own country. It could just reveal your complete unawareness and uselessness as a leader. I am getting really tired. I will listen to anything that makes sense that is what I like. You have made fun of me, called me a moron, while I have been completely polite and patient. You know why I have been that way? It's because I was expecting it.

BWAHAHHAH!!!

Sorry, I don't mean to laugh, but thank you for that.