Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: NSA Wiretapping Only The Tip Of The Iceberg

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749

    NSA Wiretapping Only The Tip Of The Iceberg

    NSA Spying Part of Broader Effort
    Intelligence Chief Says Bush Authorized Secret Activities Under One Order

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...102137_pf.html

    (Gold9472: This is nothing new, according to Russell Tice.)

    By Dan Eggen
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Wednesday, August 1, 2007; A01

    The Bush administration's chief intelligence official said yesterday that President Bush authorized a series of secret surveillance activities under a single executive order in late 2001. The disclosure makes clear that a controversial National Security Agency program was part of a much broader operation than the president previously described.

    The disclosure by Mike McConnell, the director of national intelligence, appears to be the first time that the administration has publicly acknowledged that Bush's order included undisclosed activities beyond the warrantless surveillance of e-mails and phone calls that Bush confirmed in December 2005.

    In a letter to Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), McConnell wrote that the executive order following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks included "a number of . . . intelligence activities" and that a name routinely used by the administration -- the Terrorist Surveillance Program -- applied only to "one particular aspect of these activities, and nothing more."

    "This is the only aspect of the NSA activities that can be discussed publicly, because it is the only aspect of those various activities whose existence has been officially acknowledged," McConnell said.

    The program that Bush announced was put under a court's supervision in January, but the administration now wants congressional approval to do much of the same surveillance without a court order.

    McConnell's letter was aimed at defending Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales from allegations by Democrats that he may have committed perjury by telling Congress that no legal objections were raised about the TSP. Gonzales said a legal fight in early 2004 was focused on "other intelligence activities" than those confirmed by Bush, but he never connected those to Bush's executive order.

    But in doing so, McConnell's letter also underscored that the full scope of the NSA's surveillance program under Bush's order has not been revealed. The TSP described by Bush and his aides allowed the interception of communication between the United States and other countries where one party is believed to be tied to al-Qaeda, so other types of communication or data are presumably being collected under the parts of the wider NSA program that remain hidden.

    News reports over the past 20 months have detailed a range of activities linked to the program, including the use of data mining to identify surveillance targets and the participation of telecommunication companies in turning over millions of phone records. The administration has not publicly confirmed such reports.

    A spokesman for McConnell declined to elaborate on the letter. The Justice Department also declined to comment.

    Specter was noncommittal yesterday on whether McConnell's explanation resolved his questions about the accuracy of Gonzales's previous testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, where Specter is the ranking Republican. Specter said he was waiting for a separate letter from the attorney general to provide additional clarification.

    "If he doesn't have a plausible explanation, then he hasn't leveled with the committee," Specter said on CNN. Justice spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said that "the department will continue to work with Senator Specter to address his concerns" but declined to comment further.

    McConnell's letter leaves maneuvering room for both sides in the political fracas over whether Gonzales has been truthful in his testimony. On the one hand, the NSA was clearly engaged in activities that were distinct enough to require different "legal bases" authorizing their use, according to McConnell's account.

    "If you think about it technically, it is pretty clear that the NSA desk that does communications intercepts is separate from the desk that does data mining of call records," said Kim Taipale, executive director of the Center for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology Policy, a New York-based nonprofit group. "Those are separate processes, and to think of them as separate programs is not a stretch."

    On the other hand, the activities were authorized under a single presidential order and were all part of an NSA effort to gather communications about suspected terrorists after the Sept. 11 attacks. That helps explain why many Democratic lawmakers and administration officials -- including FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III -- viewed the wiretapping as part of a larger NSA program, rather than a separate effort, as Gonzales's testimony has suggested.

    "Both sides have a legitimate case, if you want to be legalist about it," Taipale said.

    The 45-day reauthorization of a single presidential order was probably a "bureaucratic convenience" that eliminated the need to issue multiple authorizations, he added.

    Kate Martin, executive director of the Center for National Security Studies, said the new disclosures show that Gonzales and other administration officials have "repeatedly misled the Congress and the American public" about the extent of NSA surveillance efforts.

    "They have repeatedly tried to give the false impression that the surveillance was narrow and justified," Martin said. "Why did it take accusations of perjury before the DNI disclosed that there is indeed other, presumably broader and more questionable, surveillance?"

    Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.), who was among a group of four Democratic senators who called last week for a perjury investigation of Gonzales, said: "The question of whether Attorney General Gonzales perjured himself looms as large now as it did before this letter.

    "This letter is no vindication of the attorney general," he said.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  2. #2
    AuGmENTor Guest
    Well, if we're not terrorists, and we have nothing to hide, we shouldn't MIND them watching our communications.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Quote Originally Posted by AuGmENTor
    Well, if we're not terrorists, and we have nothing to hide, we shouldn't MIND them watching our communications.
    Someone made that argument to me today. "Unless you're doing something illegal, then you shouldn't care if they monitor you."

    Imagine this scenario...

    Andrew: "Hey, it's Andrew..."
    Andrew's Friend: "Hey sweety."
    Andrew: "Man, that blowjob you gave me the other day was awesome."
    Andrew's Friend: "Thank you."

    A few years later, Andrew decides that he would like to run for office. Someone posts this particular conversation in a commercial, and we find out that "Andrew's Friend" is actually a man, and that Andrew is gay. As a result, Andrew loses the election.

    I have a problem with that.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  4. #4
    AuGmENTor Guest
    I have a problem with your choice of examples. We promised each other we wouldn't blow up each others spot until you were elected...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    heh...
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  6. #6
    AuGmENTor Guest
    And don't call me sweety! I downloaded that movie Falling Down. Fucked up shit...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Quote Originally Posted by AuGmENTor
    And don't call me sweety! I downloaded that movie Falling Down. Fucked up shit...
    Yea, good movie.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  8. #8
    werther Guest
    hahaaaa! that was funny. Good point Gold. Whenever I hear that intellectually corrupt argument I declare that I did not realize so many Americans sympathized with the Chinese form of government control. That usually gets 'em thinking. ......well maybe 'thinking' isn't the right word.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,749
    Can you imagine being watched every hour of every day? Who would accept something like that?
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  10. #10
    AuGmENTor Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Gold9472
    Can you imagine being watched every hour of every day? Who would accept something like that?
    Isn't there a "reality" show based on that concept? Fuckin TV.

Similar Threads

  1. Abu Ghraib Abuse Just Tip Of The Iceberg: Author
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-19-2007, 08:19 PM
  2. Democrats Call For NSA Wiretapping Hearing
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-20-2007, 10:22 AM
  3. Deal on NSA wiretapping
    By werther in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-13-2006, 12:59 PM
  4. Warrantless Wiretapping Goes Beyond What We Were Told
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-01-2006, 06:43 PM
  5. FBI Admits To Wiretapping Wrong Numbers
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-30-2005, 10:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •