Bush Plans To Veto Expansion Of Health Program For Children

[Gold9472]

Bush plans to veto expansion of health program for children

http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_6378606

BY ROBERT PEAR, The New York Times
Article Last Updated: 07/14/2007 11:04:58 PM PDT

WASHINGTON — The White House said Saturday that President Bush would veto a bipartisan plan to expand the Children's Health Insurance Program, drafted over the last six months by senior members of the Senate Finance Committee.

That puts Bush at odds with the Democratic majority in Congress, with a substantial number of Republican lawmakers and with many governors of both parties, who want to expand the popular program to cover some of the nation's 8 million uninsured children.

Tony Fratto, a White House spokesman, said: "The president's senior advisers will certainly recommend a veto of this proposal. And there is no question that the president would veto it."

The program, which insured 7.4 million people at some time in the last year, is set to expire Sept. 30.

The Finance Committee is expected to approve the Senate plan next week, sending it to the full Senate for action later this month.

Sen. Max Baucus, the Montana Democrat who is chairman of the committee, said he would move ahead despite the veto threat.

"The Senate will not be deterred from helping more kids in need," Baucus said. "The president should stop playing politics and start working with Congress to help kids, through renewal of this program."

The proposal would increase current levels of spending by $35 billion over the next five years, bringing the total to $60 billion. The Congressional Budget Office says the plan would reduce the number of uninsured children by 4.1 million.

The new spending would be financed by an increase in the federal excise tax on tobacco products. The tax on cigarettes would rise to $1 a pack, from the current 39 cents, with proportionate increases for other tobacco products.

(Gold9472: That pisses me off.)

Fratto, the White House spokesman, said, "Tax increases are neither necessary nor advisable to fund the program appropriately."

"Congress needs to deliver a bill the president can sign," or a simple extension of the existing law, "so people don't worry about losing their current coverage," Fratto said. Federal and state officials, however, said the current level of spending was not adequate to continue coverage for all the people now on the rolls.

Democrats in the House would go much further than the bipartisan Senate plan. They would add $50 billion to the program over five years, bringing the total to $75 billion. By contrast, in his latest budget request, Bush proposed an increase of $5 billion over five years, which would bring the total to $30 billion.

White House officials said the president had several other reasons to veto the bipartisan Senate plan.

[PhilosophyGenius]

Compationat conservatism.

[AuGmENTor]

If they raise that tax, I really will quit smoking this time. Is there a rider tacked onto this bill? Lots of times they report these things and don't tell you that there is a stipulation in the bill (totally seperate mind you that) makes it impossible to sign. Not that I am defending Bush. He's an asshole of the purest refinement. But it just makes me wonder. I guess the big tobacco companies aren't the only ones who need you to smoke. Even at 39 cents a pack in federal tax, they pull in quite a bit.

[beltman713]

Hey, this is part of the NO Child Left Behind bill. They can't be left behind if they're dead.

[Gold9472]

Hey, this is part of the NO Child Left Behind bill. They can't be left behind if they're dead.

I was going to say something about "no child left behind", but then I started thinking... is this a distraction from what Sicko was trying to get?

[beltman713]

Maybe. This is an example of the good that government can do, but Bush is afraid it might lead to free national health care and his corporate masters in the health care and pharmaceutical industries won't stand for it.

[Gold9472]

Maybe. This is an example of the good that government can do, but Bush is afraid it might lead to free national health care and his corporate masters in the health care and pharmaceutical industries won't stand for it.

Right. They rule this country. Along with oil, tobacco, alcohol, and defense.