Quote Originally Posted by justrealizedit
I think one of the problems with the 911 truth seekers argument about the collapse of the twin towers is that many of them say the towers came down in a classic controlled demolition. This is not really the case and i think it hurts the truth movement and makes people less likely to realize the truth. Obviously, the towers did come down in a controlled demolition, and anyone who denies this after watching video of the collapse is either stupid or a liar, but they did not come down in a classic fashon. The classic way is when the bottom is blown out first and then the building just collapses in on itself, as was the case with wtc 7. In the case of the towers, though, they basically blew outward, starting from the top and going down, and they didn't simply collapse on their footprint, but they were blown outward. My point is that the towers were a different kind of controlled demolition than wtc7 and most other demolitions, and 911 truthers need to address this instead of saying the towers were a classic demolition.
Maybe it's just me....but a classic controlled demolition may not produce the desired "it was hit by a plane" visual effect. These aren't stupid people.