Elizabeth Hasselbeck is not the best person to debate 9/11. Then again neither is Rosie.
As for the melted steel? The one thing Lizzie got right: The steel doesn't have to melt. It need only be weakened. Which a jet fuel fire can accomplish easily, especially with accompanying structural damage. And if you really want to claim there was "molten steel" on site (which there was most likely not, look into where the claims came from and how) it would be A) aluminum, or B) http://www.wpi.edu/News/Transformati...ing/steel.html