Quote Originally Posted by Eckolaker
Have you been to the new Loose Change forums? If you're banned there let me know, Im sure I can assist with that.
I think so. Here is the notification post in the thread where I was posting before being banned.

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...ic=14889&st=30

Quote Originally Posted by Eckolaker
As for JREF, I read the threads there quite often but refuse to allow myself to post, for many of the reasons you are already privy too. They're simply a waste of time, I like to call them 18%'ers As in the 18% of people that still buy the official myth of 9/11. They are truly some of the most blind, either by choice or for reasons of following who they believe to identify with.
I understand that. I gave up on finding allies on the 9-11 boards. people are way to into "flock" behaviros and the perps know it, exploit it. It turns out our socialization, unconscious programs respond readily to the written words of ridicule in the quasi social setting of message boards. Gaggly emoticons simply accentuate the ridicule and make people cringe. Lost in cogntiive distortions and emotional reasoning they go along with what is comfortable.

So, not finding any allies on the 9-11 BB's with a hard edge for logic and reason utilizing images of raw evidence, I went out into "denial land" to try my luck at converting some neo con sociopaths. Where upon their eventual default denial and labeling became just too onerous in light of my hard evidence and I had to call them on their BS.
If it talks like a duck, and you have records of what been said, walks like a duck and you have records of ducks walking, it is a duck, or in this case "sociopath".
9-11 made them and brought them out. Fear controls and creates default defenses against the severe cognitive dissonance.

Then again, some of them are certainly disinfo agents of a type. You should hear them cash in on the cognitive dissonance with statements like, "So, you believe your government built the towers just to demolish them."

Hey, did I just get on topic for a second there?