Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: W Pushes Envelope On U.S. Spying, Can Now Peek Through Your Mail

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,708

    W Pushes Envelope On U.S. Spying, Can Now Peek Through Your Mail

    W pushes envelope on U.S. spying
    New postal law lets Bush peek through your mail

    http://www.nydailynews.com/front/sto...p-408789c.html

    BY JAMES GORDON MEEK
    DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU
    1/4/2006

    President Bush added a "signing statement" in recently passed postal reform bill that may give him new powers to pry into your mail - without a warrant.

    WASHINGTON - President Bush has quietly claimed sweeping new powers to open Americans' mail without a judge's warrant, the Daily News has learned.

    The President asserted his new authority when he signed a postal reform bill into law on Dec. 20. Bush then issued a "signing statement" that declared his right to open people's mail under emergency conditions.

    That claim is contrary to existing law and contradicted the bill he had just signed, say experts who have reviewed it.

    Bush's move came during the winter congressional recess and a year after his secret domestic electronic eavesdropping program was first revealed. It caught Capitol Hill by surprise.

    "Despite the President's statement that he may be able to circumvent a basic privacy protection, the new postal law continues to prohibit the government from snooping into people's mail without a warrant," said Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), the incoming House Government Reform Committee chairman, who co-sponsored the bill.

    Experts said the new powers could be easily abused and used to vacuum up large amounts of mail.

    "The [Bush] signing statement claims authority to open domestic mail without a warrant, and that would be new and quite alarming," said Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies in Washington.

    "The danger is they're reading Americans' mail," she said.

    "You have to be concerned," agreed a career senior U.S. official who reviewed the legal underpinnings of Bush's claim. "It takes Executive Branch authority beyond anything we've ever known."

    A top Senate Intelligence Committee aide promised, "It's something we're going to look into."

    Most of the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act deals with mundane reform measures. But it also explicitly reinforced protections of first-class mail from searches without a court's approval.

    Yet in his statement Bush said he will "construe" an exception, "which provides for opening of an item of a class of mail otherwise sealed against inspection in a manner consistent ... with the need to conduct searches in exigent circumstances."

    Bush cited as examples the need to "protect human life and safety against hazardous materials and the need for physical searches specifically authorized by law for foreign intelligence collection."

    White House spokeswoman Emily Lawrimore denied Bush was claiming any new authority.

    "In certain circumstances - such as with the proverbial 'ticking bomb' - the Constitution does not require warrants for reasonable searches," she said.

    Bush, however, cited "exigent circumstances" which could refer to an imminent danger or a longstanding state of emergency.

    Critics point out the administration could quickly get a warrant from a criminal court or a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judge to search targeted mail, and the Postal Service could block delivery in the meantime.

    But the Bush White House appears to be taking no chances on a judge saying no while a terror attack is looming, national security experts agreed.

    Martin said that Bush is "using the same legal reasoning to justify warrantless opening of domestic mail" as he did with warrantless eavesdropping.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  2. #2
    AuGmENTor Guest

    "You have to be concerned," agreed a career senior U.S. official who reviewed the legal underpinnings of Bush's claim. "It takes Executive Branch authority beyond anything we've ever known."

    Question: How accurate is this statement? Some of the older people I talk to say that this is NOT the worst it's been. That at other times (noteably WWII) the government has taken actions to control the populace until the war was over. Presumably, things went back to normal after the war. The funny thing here is, they've already said they dont expect this war to end in our lifetime.

Similar Threads

  1. Wyden Pushes For Release Of CIA 9/11 Report
    By Gold9472 in forum 9/11 Justice Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-07-2007, 11:07 PM
  2. Air America Mail Scare
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-14-2006, 03:15 PM
  3. Israel Pushes Into Lebanon
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-01-2006, 03:48 PM
  4. Chain e-mail out there about the War in Iraq
    By Good Doctor HST in forum The New News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-07-2006, 05:44 PM
  5. Bush Pushes For Patriot Act
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-09-2005, 03:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •