Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Reopen 9/11 Investigation, Local Group Says

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,708

    Reopen 9/11 Investigation, Local Group Says

    Reopen 9/11 investigation, local group says

    http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/a...=2006612310307

    By John Briggs
    Published: Sunday, December 31, 2006

    A Burlington group has gathered nearly enough signatures on a petition to put a ballot question before voters on Town Meeting Day urging a new investigation of the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.

    Spokesman Marc Estrin, a Burlington writer and musician, said the group has been meeting for several months and has more than 1,200 of the roughly 1,350 signatures needed to place the matter on the ballot. The question would advise the Vermont congressional delegation to demand a new 9/11 investigation.

    Estrin said Burlington would be the first city in the country to formally make such a demand.

    The group includes Burlington attorney Frank Haddleton, University of Vermont physics professor Joanna Rankin, Charles Simpson, chairman of the department of sociology and criminal justice at SUNY Plattsburgh, a chemist, an engineer, a video producer and former city councilor Doug Dunbebin.

    Dunbebin, a graphic designer, has created a Web site for the group that explains the weaknesses it sees in the 9/11 Commission Report of July 2004.

    The city's director of elections, Jo Lamarche, said that because the City Council in September unanimously passed a resolution promising to honor advisory ballot questions when the required number of signatures has been gathered, the question would likely be on the ballot in March. She said the council might adjust the wording.

    The deadline for gathering the signatures is Jan. 29, but Estrin said the petition drive will be completed in a few days. Lamarche said the issue would be on the council's agenda for its Jan. 8 meeting.

    Estrin said that because the 9/11 attacks led directly to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the American people deserve an objective investigation of what happened.

    In a news release, the group said the ballot question "does not advance any particular alternative theory" about what happened on 9/11, but "focuses on the need to get answers to hundreds of questions" raised by families of victims and others, including "members of the intelligence community."

    Estrin said the group believes the 9/11 Commission, in part because its work was directed by administration insider Philip Zelikow, ignored obvious questions about why the World Trade Center towers fell as they did and why nearby Building 7, a part of the World Trade Center complex, fell in what appeared to be a "controlled demolition." The "free-fall" collapse of the three buildings, Estrin said, is "both technically and architecturally problematic" and wasn't adequately investigated by the commission.

    He said independent researchers also have raised questions about the thoroughness of the commission's investigation of the damage at the Pentagon and of the absence of plane wreckage there and at the crash site of the plane in Pennsylvania.

    Estrin said the group also would like an explanation of why routine air-defense protocols weren't followed Sept. 11 in scrambling fighter interceptors.

    A new "objective and nonpartisan" investigation, he said, "seems a reasonable thing to do about such a crucial event."

    Estrin said the ballot question is a logical way to move such an investigation forward, particularly given the city's history of engagement with national and international issues.

    "The events of 9/11 have affected Burlington residents," he said, and added, "Democracy resides not just at the center, but at the periphery. Citizens are supposed to have a voice in national issues."

    Contact John Briggs at 660-1863 or jbriggs@bfp.burlingtonfreepress.com
    BALLOT TEXT The wording of the advisory ballot question for Burlington on Town Meeting Day: "Shall Vermont's Congressional Delegation be advised to demand a new, thorough, and truly independent forensic investigation that fully addresses the many questions surrounding the tragic events of September 11, 2001?"

    More information is available at the local group's Web site, www.vt911.org. The site provides an overview of what the group sees as the inadequacies of the official 9/11 Commission report and pro-
    vides links to related sites.

    The 585-page official 9/11 Commission report can be found online at
    www.9-11commission.gov.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,708
    9/11 probe question will pass to voters

    http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/a...10/1007/NEWS05

    Published: Tuesday, January 9, 2007
    By John Briggs
    Free Press Staff Writer

    Burlington voters on Town Meeting Day will be the first in the country to vote 'yes' or 'no' on reopening the investigation into what happened Sept. 11, 2001.

    As of Jan. 4, a local group had gathered 1,240 of the approximately 1,350 signatures (5 percent of registered voters) required to put the question on the ballot, and a member of the group, Burlington attorney Frank Haddleton, expressed confidence Monday that they now have more than enough signatures.

    The question would ask the Vermont congressional delegation to "demand a new, thorough, and truly independent forensic investigation" to answer "the many questions" the group says remain about what happened the day planes commandeered by terrorists smashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

    In September, the council unanimously passed a resolution promising they would honor the Vermont tradition of allowing such questions if they garner enough signatures, "whether or not they like the questions or agree with the petitioners."

    Monday, the council agreed unanimously that they wouldn't vote on putting the 9/11 question on the March ballot after City Attorney Joe McNeil said the September resolution had put the council views on record and that the question would be on the ballot if the signatures were submitted by Jan. 25.

    The group said in a letter to the council that it doesn't "advance any particular alternative theory" about what happened Sept. 11, 2001, but thinks the day's aftermath, including wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, are so serious that a new investigation is warranted "to get answers to hundreds of questions raised by independent researchers, members of the intelligence community and family members of 9/11 victims."

    The attacks, the letter said, have been cited as justifications for the wars, "wiretapping, the USA PATRIOT Act, torture, indefinite detentions without charges, and the recently passed Military Commission Act that suspends the writ of habeas corpus. We maintain that until the serious, credible questions about 9/11 are addressed, the government has no right to ask us to compromise the Constitution or engage in any new wars again terrorism."

    The group's spokesman, local author and musician Marc Estrin, said the ballot item would be the first of its sort in the United States.

    "We're all very pleased that the council voted not to interfere and let it go forward if we come up with the signatures," Haddleton said.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


Similar Threads

  1. Reopen 9/11 Investigation, Local Group Says
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-01-2007, 12:38 AM
  2. Group Presses For 9/11 Investigation To Be Reopened
    By Gold9472 in forum 9/11 Justice Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-12-2006, 08:54 AM
  3. Group Seeks FEC Investigation Of Hastert Fund
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-13-2005, 09:38 PM
  4. Reopen 9/11 Video
    By PhilosophyGenius in forum 9/11 Justice Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-13-2005, 05:02 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-11-2005, 10:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •