View Poll Results: Should We Ignore or Discredit “Disinformation” in the 9/11 Movement?

Voters
9. You may not vote on this poll
  • Ignore

    4 44.44%
  • Discredit

    5 55.56%
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 33

Thread: Should We Ignore or Discredit “Disinformation” in the 9/11 Movement?

  1. #21
    AuGmENTor Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by AuGmENTor
    My refrence was more for the peple who venture out into the other forums (what other forums, hehe) Of course, EVERYONE behaves in Jons house...
    No, I don't. Wanna tell me more?

  2. #22
    AuGmENTor Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by MrDark71
    No one has any idea WHY MKULTRA was instituted.

    pardon my French but wtf is MKULTRA?
    The extent of my knowlege is that it was some sort of a mind control program. But go ahead and google it. Or be lazy like me and just wait for someone to tell you in here.

  3. #23
    MrDark71 Guest
    You know....a nauseating thought just struck me about Alex Jones and the like....knowlingly "adding" disinformation to others hard work just to gain some spotlight seems way to much like "making a profit off of 9/11" hmmmmmmm.

  4. #24
    AuGmENTor Guest
    So you're thinking that Alex Jones isn't what he seems?

  5. #25
    werther Guest
    Alex Jones certainly 'exagerates' to point of fabrication.

  6. #26
    AuGmENTor Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by werther
    Alex Jones certainly 'exagerates' to point of fabrication.
    Gimme an example. I got FRIED on this site one time for suggesting that he didn't shit gold coins.

  7. #27
    Christophera Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by MrDark71
    No one has any idea WHY MKULTRA was instituted.

    pardon my French but wtf is MKULTRA?
    Your French is fine.

    General description, scope

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKULTRA

    Fringe

    http://peyote.com/jonstef/mkultra.htm

    List of actual documents

    http://michael-robinett.com/declass/c000.htm

    Focus

    http://www.mkultra.info/mkultra_hypn...xperiments.htm


    The fact is, we do not know everything about the mind. Fox news will tell you otherwise.

  8. #28
    werther Guest

  9. #29
    MrDark71 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by AuGmENTor
    So you're thinking that Alex Jones isn't what he seems?
    Well...in one of his videos he is extensively analyizing a clip of what he claims are both towers before they fell and this plume of white smoke at the base suggesting pre-collapse explosion. When in fact it's clearly obvious (even with his shitty video) you are looking at two sides of ONE tower post collapse of the other,clearly evident by the fact the damage on each side was about the same floor...not a 20 floor difference as would be the case if it were both towers. Thusly...his pre collapse plume is actually post collapse pyro flow/smoke from the other tower. Why does he have to MAKE SHIT UP? You know he knew what he was doing. I find it hard to believe no one in the "Alex" camp noticed this HUGE error before and after the release. They can't be that dumb and if thats the case it provides even further creedence to the idea that he's full of shit. His whole agenda seems to be to cause such furer in the movement while lying to it's face. Someone soooo seemingly nice and open-minded, certainly seems to create a heck of a lot of "truths" based on the smell of his own farts. I'd like to strap his ass on the bottom of a plane fly that fucker into a mountain... the pod.

  10. #30
    Christophera Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by MrDark71
    I find it hard to believe no one in the "Alex" camp noticed this HUGE error before and after the release.
    Yes, how convienent. Co enabling. "Free for all" of unacountable nonsense.


    Interpretations of smoke are one thing, the movement generally cannot conduct rational dialog on structural members of the towers. evidence of images during demolition.

    So yea, ..................... they keep us busy with smoke and mirrors. Both sides against the middle inside invisible, internet land. Yippee, where's the emoticons?

    Ever notice how it works where they can only speak to thousands (x100?) and you and I can only find a message board?

    When it gets down to the wire like this, the greater meaning of free speech is definitely in the listening, if it is going to have its needed meaning.

Similar Threads

  1. Bush Says He May Ignore New War-Funding Law
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-19-2006, 09:12 AM
  2. A "Concerted Effort" To Discredit Bush Critic
    By Gold9472 in forum The New News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-09-2006, 03:23 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-22-2006, 07:24 PM
  4. Ignore the gunfire, look at the opulence instead!
    By Partridge in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-07-2005, 05:41 PM
  5. THE QUESTION BUSH CAN NO LONGER IGNORE
    By ehnyah in forum The New News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-10-2005, 07:52 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •