Some might see this as an attempt by FTW to undermine the creditability of AJ and the LC crew.

Could the fact that the AJ staff has consistantly put out far better articles then the phd's over at FTW? Coupled with the fact that both LC and AJ's material is for all intensive purposes free to everyone?

Agreed, AJ can over emphasize facts, and I think he does it on a daily basis. No form of media is free from "spin". That said, I still think AJ has far less spin then any other media format out there.

As for the LC crew. Their film has reached millions, Period. Yes, the first 2 editions had several inaccuracies, and assumptions. Hence you see that a Recut was put out. They are also working on a final cut that should only contain rock solid facts. However, at the end of the day, that film is responsible for more media coverage, more "awakenings", more people asking questions, then any other attempt before or after it.

Realistically, should different forms of the movement be attacking each other?

What progress could that possibly bring about? Why put out an article with content that suggests one form of the movement is more credible then another?

Unless your goal is to create dissent.