What did you think of the family members statements outside of the Commission Hearings? "A bunch of people giving accolades to each other", and "It's a cover-up, it's a stonewall, I'm very bitter, I'm very angry..."
Tired...
What did you think of the family members statements outside of the Commission Hearings? "A bunch of people giving accolades to each other", and "It's a cover-up, it's a stonewall, I'm very bitter, I'm very angry..."
Yes indeedy. It's facts, it's mainstream facts from mainstream sources, and it has a strong human-interest angle which a film like EGLS (which I also like a lot) does not. I don't see why this couldn't be the next Farenheit 9/11, just in terms of its potential mainstream appeal, and that would be HUGE. Anyone who sees this movie and realizes just how fucked not only our government but our media is (and does not feel sure that it was produced by the Lizard People who are REALLY running the show) has a moral obligation to propagate this movie like an information virus.
I think we're living in 1930's Germany here, people, and I'm not going down without a fight. Information is the only weapon in this struggle, and 9/11 Press for Truth is a major addition to the arsenal.
Tired...
They're actually calling it the anti-Fahrenheit 9/11... However, I would certainly like to see it get the same attention.
Tired...
Thanks for the partial write-up.
Oh no, I think you and I are on the same page about bin Ladin, and believe me, I brought that up in the post-showing brouhaha. Within the movie are clear statements that 1) there is NO WAY "al Qaeda" could have pulled off something of this magnitude and that 2)the CIA and the ISI worked hand in glove to create the mujahedeen and thus "al Qaeda. What the movie does not do (unless it's the last 15 minutes) is pull out a 2x4 and beat the viewer over the head with the concept that bin Ladin is a CIA puppet. Basically, the movie offers a lot of dots for the viewer to connect, including stuff I didn't know, like the airlift out of that Afghan city that was like a parade down mainstreet in its covertness. The thing is, it does not connect all the dots FOR the viewer, which I personally think is just fine, because I trust people to do their own research when they have questions, and this film provokes many really good questions. Others in the group, however, have a kind of mass-hypnosis film theory -- if you show "them" (Mr. and Mrs. Average, but slightly concerned) too many images of bin Ladin, they're going to get permanently stuck in the idea that it was "just" al Qaeda and the ISI.
As for the Jersey Girls outside the Commission making their criticisms, the volume on that could have been turned up for me. I could've gone for something a little more like -- I'm blanking on her name -- the mother of one victim who just went full-on Clytemnestra over her daughter's death. But that's not them, and it doesn't need to be them.
Of course it's the anti-Fahrenheit 911 -- I was drawing a comparison on the basis of the potential for popularity, eventual mainstream distribution, yadda yadda.
As soon as I see the whole thing, I'll review it over at blogger (unless there's a problem with doing that before the release date.) I want to see if I can avert a little of the negativity with a more detailed account of what it IS and what it ISN'T so that people will judge it on its own merits, which are many.
Tired...
People need to understand that 911PFT doesn't talk about a lot of things. It doesn't mention Sibel Edmonds (one of my favorite topics), it doesn't mention Professor Jones, it doesn't mention all kinds of things, but what it does do, is wake people up to the information the movement is aware of...
For instance... go talk to someone about Controlled Demolition, and risk being laughed at, or, show someone 911PFT, and then talk about the idea of Controlled Demolition.
This movie opens the door to everything we know.
Tired...
In my opinion, there's nothing "negative" about the film. You need to look at it from the point of view of someone not in the choir. If information not being in the film gives it a negative conotation, then that's something people are going to have to deal with. The film will wake everyone who watches it up. We can't ask for anything more than that.Originally Posted by casseia
Yes.
We're going to have an intermission after PFT and then go right into Webster Tarpley and Steven Jones.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote