Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: The Anglo-American Empire's "Next 9/11" Will Set Up Final War

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,727

    The Anglo-American Empire's "Next 9/11" Will Set Up Final War

    The Anglo-American empire’s “next 9/11” will set up final war; “foiled” UK terror plot a propaganda dry run

    http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publ...cle_1098.shtml

    (Gold9472: Several links in the original.)

    By Larry Chin
    Aug 12, 2006, 00:22

    The August 10 report of a spectacular foiled UK-based super-terror plot, an alleged Operation Bojinka variation, has sparked an unprecedented round of 9/11-style fear and panic mongering throughout the world. This is a new attempt, at the highest levels of the Bush and Blair administrations, in concert with Pakistan’s ISI and Israel, to fabricate the justification for an escalation in the “war on terrorism” across the Middle East.

    This escalation will include an attack on Iran and Syria as early as October, and with even greater geostrategic violence to follow.

    Proof that Bush administration planning the next 9/11
    Dick Cheney recently declared: “The enemy that struck on 9/11 is fractured and weakened, yet still lethal, still determined to hit us again.” That is a concise description of Cheney’s own administration, and its intentions. And he knows it.

    It is a known fact that the Bush administration, itching for a wider war, has been planning to set up a “second 9/11” to establish the pretext to justify a multi-front war stretching from Africa across Middle East, and across the Eurasian continent that the Anglo-American empire seeks to control:

    The Pentagon's "Second 9/11"
    It is now known that Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld (among others) have been overtly planning “another attack [blamed on 'terrorists' and/or Iran] that could create both a justification and an opportunity that is lacking today to retaliate against some known targets.” The Bush administration has already prepared the operation, as well as the criminal lies and propaganda to go with it.

    There is a good reason why Bush and Blair have spent so much time together lately.

    Recent rhetoric from the Bush administration’s criminal leadership (Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld) has clearly attempted to tie Hezbollah, Hamas, Iraqi resistance, Afghan fighters, and other “Islamic fascists” with “Al-Qaeda.” The mass public has willingly accepted this and other ongoing “war on terrorism” deceptions.

    These detailed plans by the Bush administration, in place for over the past year, with instructions given to its military-intelligence agencies, await the official go-ahead. Undoubtedly, the “next 9/11” will be blamed on “Islamic fascists,” and either directly carried out by manipulated intelligence assets, or deliberately provoked by atrocities now being committed in the Middle East and Iraq. But, just as it was on 9/11, the fascists at the highest levels in Washington, London and Islamabad (and Tel Aviv) will be the ones responsible for whatever happens next.

    Manufactured blowback is not blowback. Guided covert operations are manufactured terrorism, not “terrorism.”

    The next 9/11 may already be happening
    Recent events suggest that the broader operation likely began with the horrific Mumbai transit bomb attacks, a blatantly manufactured event carried out by terror cells directly connected to Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence, the ISI (a virtual branch of the American CIA), and the same (alleged “Al-Qaeda”) apparatus also responsible for the Bush administration’s 9/11 and other post-9/11 terror events.

    This was followed by Israel’s attack on Gaza, and its invasion of Lebanon, with both events preceded by a bogus “anti-terrorism” pretext. The London construct follows the same pattern as the London 7/7, which was a false flag operation.

    Ties to London 7/7 lead back to Bush, Blair, ISI
    Current reports about the new foiled London plot pin the responsibility on “homegrown” terrorists with ties to Pakistan and "Al-Qaeda", and the London 7/7 attacks. The London 7/7 attack itself was the work ofBritish intelligence, as well as Pakistan's ISI.

    This is the same apparatus, the same “terror” propaganda. The international feeding frenzy of security “experts” and current and former spooks falling over themselves to proclaim the threat to be real, quick to lick at Bush-Cheney’s jackboots, is no surprise.

    Meanwhile, officials in London have, predictably, provided little or no concrete evidence to support their allegations, or the conspiracy theories and speculations spinning out of control across the media. This is consistent with every “terror” event since 9/11: deception and cover-up, no evidence.

    Meanwhile, underneath the layers of noise created by the mighty Wurlitzer, bits such as this line from the Washington Post beg for attention: “Intelligence officials and private analysts expressed suspicion that the plot was an al Qaeda operation, but said there was no confirmation.”

    Fear, intimidation, stupidity
    The UK terror story is, at the very least, a test of the effectiveness of the “terrorism” propaganda apparatus that has been the bread and butter of Bush/Blair/Israel.

    Based on Pavlovian reactions to the new stories, and the panic, and mass ignorance displayed by the masses, the fear of “terrorists” and bone-deep racism inspired by Bush’s manufactured 9/11 false flag operation remain tragically potent. Mass public ignorance still abounds, evidenced by the international paralysis of the past 48 hours. The “terrorists 24-7” narrative has been accepted without a hint of skepticism, without any questions, without the pursuit of any facts, by the vast majority -- still powerful enough, in spite of the unpopularity of Bush and the Iraq “mistake,” to fuel the criminal “war on terrorism” well into the future.

    Until and unless realities are understood and directly faced, the world remains in the sleeperhold of the propaganda apparatus of Bush-Blair-Olmert. As long as this dynamic persists, these legions of “good Germans,” obediently swallowing their propaganda poisons, will jump through the hoops, even as more government-approved mass murder takes place, including their own.

    Adjusting the script, covering their political rear ends
    It is clear that, for reasons of political expediency, that the “war on terrorism” narrative has been changed to focus on “foiled” terror plots, and (“even tougher to apprehend”) “homegrown terrorists,” in order to 1) create the perception of competence and successful anti-terrorism to counter criticism from political opponents (themselves equally fervent, equally criminal “war on terrorism” proponents) who have criticized the Bush administration’s “failures,” while 2) infusing the “Al-Qaeda” propaganda structure with fresh and lurid new twists.

    These new fictions include slippery "home grown terrorists", alleged to still be guided by “Al-Qaeda,” “specialists” capable of carrying out “spectaculars,” and endless speculations about creative new delivery methods.

    The tipping point is now
    Five years have gone by since the manufactured crisis of 9/11. Now, the Anglo-American empire needs a “new 9/11” or a perceived threat capable of deceiving the mass public into supporting the next planned geostrategic horror.

    Check the calendar, and think like a Bush administration criminal. The five-year anniversary of 9/11 is only a few weeks away. The Bush administration wants to attack Iran and Syria by October. Israel is going into Lebanon, but cannot expand beyond southern Lebanon, cannot attack Syria and Iran without Anglo-American help. A US election (or “selection”) in November, likely to hand some degree of political power back to neoliberals (Democrats), gives the Bush-Cheney neocons a three-month window to attempt their super-violent end run. Peak Oil and Gas, increasing shortage, is making itself felt in earnest with the disruptions of US oil supplies from Prudhoe Bay, crisis reports from remaining oil fields (Saudi Arabia), defiance from Venezuela, etc. Desperation fuels the likelihood of increasing brute force and violence, led by the Bush administration.

    This is a moment of elite criminal consensus, and unprecedented danger.

    This is a perfect storm.

    Prepare yourselves.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    30,727
    "Another [9/11] attack could create both a justification and an opportunity to retaliate against some known targets"

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...articleId=2942

    by Michel Chossudovsky
    August 10, 2006

    One essential feature of "defense" in the case of a second major attack on America, is "offense", according to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff:"Homeland security is one piece of a broader strategy [which] brings the battle to the enemy."(DHS, Transcript of complete March 2005 speech of Secr. Michael Chertoff)

    In the month following last year's 7/7 London bombings, Vice President Dick Cheney is reported to have instructed USSTRATCOM to draw up a contingency plan "to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States". Implied in the contingency plan is the certainty that Iran would be behind a Second 9/11.

    This "contingency plan" uses the pretext of a "Second 9/11", which has not yet happened, to prepare for a major military operation against Iran, while pressure was also exerted on Tehran in relation to its (non-existent) nuclear weapons program.

    What isdiabolical in this decision of the US Vice President is that the justification presented by Cheney to wage war on Iran rests on Iran's involvement in a hypothetical terrorist attack on America, which has not yet occurred:

    The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option. As in the case of Iraq, the response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of terrorism directed against the United States. Several senior Air Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the implications of what they are doing—that Iran is being set up for an unprovoked nuclear attack—but no one is prepared to damage his career by posing any objections. (Philip Giraldi, Attack on Iran: Pre-emptive Nuclear War , The American Conservative, 2 August 2005)

    Are we to understand that US, British and Israeli military planners are waiting in limbo for a Second 9/11, to extend the war beyond the borders of Lebanon, to launch a military operation directed against Syria and Iran?

    Cheney's proposed "contingency plan" did not focus on preventing a Second 9/11. The Cheney plan is predicated on the presumption that Iran would be behind a Second 9/11 and that punitive bombings could immediately be activated, prior to the conduct of an investigation, much in the same way as the attacks on Afghanistan in October 2001, allegedly in retribution for the alleged support of the Taliban government to the 9/11 terrorists. It is worth noting that one does not plan a war in three weeks: the bombing and invasion of Afghanistan had been planned well in advance of 9/11. As Michael Keefer points out in an incisive review article:

    "At a deeper level, it implies that “9/11-type terrorist attacks” are recognized in Cheney’s office and the Pentagon as appropriate means of legitimizing wars of aggression against any country selected for that treatment by the regime and its corporate propaganda-amplification system.... (Keefer, February 2006 )

    In a timely statement, barely a few days following the onslaught of the bombing of Lebanon, Vice President Cheney reiterated his warning: "The enemy that struck on 9/11 is fractured and weakened, yet still lethal, still determined to hit us again" (Waterloo Courier, Iowa, 19 July 2006, italics added).

    "Justification and Opportunity to Retaliate against ...the State Sponsors [of Terrorism]"

    In April 2006, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld launched a far-reaching military plan to fight terrorism around the World, with a view to retaliating in the case of a second major terrorist attack on America.

    "Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has approved the military's most ambitious plan yet to fight terrorism around the world and retaliate more rapidly and decisively in the case of another major terrorist attack on the United States, according to defense officials.

    The long-awaited campaign plan for the global war on terrorism, as well as two subordinate plans also approved within the past month by Rumsfeld, are considered the Pentagon's highest priority, according to officials familiar with the three documents who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about them publicly.

    Details of the plans are secret, but in general they envision a significantly expanded role for the military -- and, in particular, a growing force of elite Special Operations troops -- in continuous operations to combat terrorism outside of war zones such as Iraq and Afghanistan. Developed over about three years by the Special Operations Command (SOCOM) in Tampa, the plans reflect a beefing up of the Pentagon's involvement in domains traditionally handled by the Central Intelligence Agency and the State Department. (Washington Post, 23 April 2006)

    This plan is predicated on the possibility of a Second 911 and the need to retaliate if and when the US is attacked:

    "A third plan sets out how the military can both disrupt and respond to another major terrorist strike on the United States. It includes lengthy annexes that offer a menu of options for the military to retaliate quickly against specific terrorist groups, individuals or state sponsors depending on who is believed to be behind an attack. Another attack could create both a justification and an opportunity that is lacking today to retaliate against some known targets, according to current and former defense officials familiar with the plan.

    This plan details "what terrorists or bad guys we would hit if the gloves came off. The gloves are not off," said one official, who asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the subject. (italics added, WP 23 April 2006)

    The presumption of this military document, is that a Second 911 attack "which is lacking today" would usefully create both a "justification and an opportunity" to wage war on "some known targets [Iran and Syria]".

    The announcement on August 10by the British Home Office of a foiled large scale terror attack to simultaneously blow up as many as ten airplanes, conveys the impression that it is the Western World rather than the Middle East which is under attack.

    Realities are twisted upside down. The disinformation campaign has gone into full gear. The British and US media are increasingly pointing towards "preemptive war" as an act of "self defense" against Al Qaeda and the State sponsors of terrorism, who are allegedly preparing a Second 911. The underlying objective, through fear and intimidation, is ultimately to build public acceptancefor the next stage of the Middle East "war on terrorism" which is directed against Syria and Iran.
    No One Knows Everything. Only Together May We Find The Truth JG


  3. #3
    PhilosophyGenius Guest
    This escalation will include an attack on Iran and Syria as early as October
    Matches what the former Pakistani intel chief is saying. (or whatever the rank)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-20-2009, 03:33 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-18-2009, 09:09 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-20-2008, 04:58 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-01-2007, 09:33 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-12-2006, 10:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •