We Have Been Reduced To A Theory

[Bull]

Terrence over at 911blogger actually blew my mind this morning by posting a link to a pdf article at his otherwise repugnant site that argues carefully and substantively against controlled demolition in any of the 3 WTC buildings -- it's by a guy associated with Implosionworld (or something.) I'm not saying he convinced me, and the article does veer into strawman territory, but he raises issues that need to be addressed, or people really can look at you and say "You're crazy" when you mention CD.

Therefore, I find myself tending more and more toward the testimony-based evidence (which would include things like the NORAD failure.) I also think it would be good to really promote the Jersey Girls and other family members. I don't give a fuck if they're "just LIHOP."

Do you have the link?

[YouCrazyDiamond]

Do you have the link?

http://xbehome.com/screwloosechange/...ard_8-8-06.pdf

And the pdf can also be found in a link on this page under the title "READ IMPLOSIONWORLD'S PAPER ON THE WORLD TRADE CENTER COLLAPSE'S":

http://www.implosionworld.com/news.htm#1

____________________

I’ve read through about half of the article and I’m not convinced. In fact I’m rather disappointed that they appear to be contributing to the confusion and lies.

But I will very likely continue to read through it with a critical eye, as I attempt to do with most such articles.

[casseia]

Or even "just incompetence," I should have added. Who deserves a "full and complete accounting" more than people who lost family members?

[Gold9472]

Bull... you don't have to convince me my friend. I've been around the block.

[casseia]

Yes, but definitely read it for yourself, Bull.

I think I could do a fairly decent job of picking it apart just on the level of rhetoric, without a lot of physics, but someone who understands some of the technical stuff would be able to critique it well.

I even downloaded the thing -- being connected to that website makes me feel dirty.

[Bull]

Yes, but definitely read it for yourself, Bull.

I think I could do a fairly decent job of picking it apart just on the level of rhetoric, without a lot of physics, but someone who understands some of the technical stuff would be able to critique it well.

I even downloaded the thing -- being connected to that website makes me feel dirty.

I'll admit, Physics is not my field (even though I will read it). I was asking because there's this site called Abovetopsecret.com and it's basically a COINTELPRO site (or the biggest gatekeeper forum on the web). Anyway, on that site there's this thread that's over a 150 pages now debating how a 757 DID hit the Pentagon! The threadstarter was a member named Catherder (not that I know him or post there...but this is what's from the link I'm about to post) who is backed by the mods...and his intro was very thought out, very smart-SOUNDING, and believable to the common reader. Well, the link below just blows it out of the water and shows how full of it the thread starter was. I mean, the Truther made his own site and everything.

http://abovetopsecret.narod.ru/Above...et_article.htm

EDIT: The site takes a while to load up.

[PhilosophyGenius]

I look at 9/11 like pieces of a puzzle, if you dont have all the pieces you can't see the whole picture. And if you look at just the pieces, you won't see the picture; in regards to 9/11 each piece itself can be rebutted. So if you can't show someone all the pieces at once you gotta show the biggest pieces which just so happens to be the WTC and Pentagon hole.

Goes back to the classic pole on this site:
http://yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6782